Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
misc
announce
answers
consultants
d-i-y
environment
environment.conservation
gov.agency.csa
gov.local
gov.social-security
gov.social-work
misc
philosophy.atheism
philosophy.humanism
philosophy.misc
radio.amateur
railway
sci.astronomy
sci.med.nursing
sci.med.pharmacy
sci.misc
sci.weather
singles
telecom
telecom.broadband
telecom.mobile
telecom.voip
test
transport
transport.air
transport.buses
transport.ferry
transport.london
transport.ride-sharing
  
 
date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 21:53:02 -0800 (PST),    group: uk.sci.astronomy        back       
Re: 03:44.   
On Feb 10, 12:15 am, Weatherlawyer  wrote:
>
> This seems to illustrate what I mean, though the clouds are hardly sea level:
>  http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/data/comp/cmoll/cmoll.html

Not for dial-up and even with BB it may take a minute to load.

Use the stop and back buttons to locate the dates 4th and 5th
February.

Notice that satellite coverage of the longitude 130 to 155 East was or
were out of service temporarily.
They or it were probably being moved to service something, the shuttle
maybe or to see more clearly, events around 110 East?

Anyone have an inkling?

They also get a boost to their orbits to compensate for mascons. Maybe
coverage was switched off around the time of this:
6.3 M. 	2008/02/04 17:01:30 TARAPACA, CHILE (The timing is perfect but
I doubt that it was the reason. Though coverage for the northern
reaches was restored PDQ.)

The region over southern Australia was out until12:00 on the 5th. Was
there anything like it for the 6.9 a few days later?

Yes.
And no.
Coverage was a little ropey from the 4th on and the whole longitude is
out again as of midnight this morning, as I write.

I haven't been following events with the shuttle; anyone here?
date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 21:53:02 -0800 (PST)   author:   Weatherlawyer

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us