Outburst of SS AUR - December 2007

Dwarf Novae are close binary systems with an accretion disc around the
white dwarf component. Outbursts from 2 to 9 magnitudes, lasting for a
day or two, occur at quasi-periodic intervals of days to years. Many
of these stars are ultraviolet and X-ray variable. Most UG's are
reclassified into the subspecies UGSS, UGSU and UGZ after further
study.

SS AUR is in the UGSS subspecies. This type increase in brightness by
2-6 mag in V in 1-2 days and in several subsequent days return to
their original brightnesses. The values of the cycle are in the range
10 days to several thousand days.

http://www.martin-nicholson.info/ssaur/ssaur.htm

Martin Nicholson, Daventry, England.
http://www.martin-nicholson.info/1/1a.htm

Visit the Astronomical Hall of Shame at http://www.geocities.com/queen5658/

"ukastronomy"  wrote in message 
news:f8e085f5-b442-4b17-8e8c-2e875a81ef0b@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
: Outburst of SS AUR - December 2007
:
: Dwarf Novae are close binary systems with an accretion disc around the
: white dwarf component.

Nonsense. There are no close binary systems. You wouldn't know
a flare star from a cepheid.

On 27 Dec, 09:39, "Androcles" <Engin...@hogwarts.physics_a> wrote:
> "ukastronomy"  wrote in message
>
> news:f8e085f5-b442-4b17-8e8c-2e875a81ef0b@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> : Outburst of SS AUR - December 2007
> :
> : Dwarf Novae are close binary systems with an accretion disc around the
> : white dwarf component.
>
> Nonsense. There are no close binary systems. You wouldn't know
> a flare star from a cepheid.

Please supply the reference for a peer reviewed article that confirms
your viewpoint regarding the non-existence of close binary pairs.

"ukastronomy"  wrote in message 
news:06596a4a-a25f-4cdd-9139-919cdd496bf0@e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
: On 27 Dec, 09:39, "Androcles" <Engin...@hogwarts.physics_a> wrote:
: > "ukastronomy"  wrote in message
: >
: > 
news:f8e085f5-b442-4b17-8e8c-2e875a81ef0b@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
: > : Outburst of SS AUR - December 2007
: > :
: > : Dwarf Novae are close binary systems with an accretion disc around the
: > : white dwarf component.
: >
: > Nonsense. There are no close binary systems. You wouldn't know
: > a flare star from a cepheid.
:
: Please supply the reference for a peer reviewed article that confirms
: your viewpoint regarding the non-existence of close binary pairs.

Google for "Roche limit".

"ukastronomy"  wrote in message
news:06596a4a-a25f-4cdd-9139-919cdd496bf0@e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
: On 27 Dec, 09:39, "Androcles" <Engin...@hogwarts.physics_a> wrote:
: > "ukastronomy"  wrote in message
: >
: >
news:f8e085f5-b442-4b17-8e8c-2e875a81ef0b@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
: > : Outburst of SS AUR - December 2007
: > :
: > : Dwarf Novae are close binary systems with an accretion disc around the
: > : white dwarf component.
: >
: > Nonsense. There are no close binary systems. You wouldn't know
: > a flare star from a cepheid.
:
: Please supply the reference for a peer reviewed article that confirms
: your viewpoint regarding the non-existence of close binary pairs.

Google for "Roche limit". Observe break up of Shoemaker Levy.
Observe rings of Saturn, Jupiter ...

This pencil is broken, I can see it is.
   http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/geoopt/optpic/brokpen.jpg
Believe that and I'll try to believe you've seen a star that varies 
intrinsically.

On 27 Dec, 11:06, "Androcles" <Engin...@hogwarts.physics_a> wrote:
> "ukastronomy"  wrote in message
>
> news:06596a4a-a25f-4cdd-9139-919cdd496bf0@e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> : On 27 Dec, 09:39, "Androcles" <Engin...@hogwarts.physics_a> wrote:
> : > "ukastronomy"  wrote in message
> : >
> : >news:f8e085f5-b442-4b17-8e8c-2e875a81ef0b@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com.> : > : Outburst of SS AUR - December 2007
> : > :
> : > : Dwarf Novae are close binary systems with an accretion disc around the
> : > : white dwarf component.
> : >
> : > Nonsense. There are no close binary systems. You wouldn't know
> : > a flare star from a cepheid.
> :
> : Please supply the reference for a peer reviewed article that confirms
> : your viewpoint regarding the non-existence of close binary pairs.
>
> Google for "Roche limit". Observe break up of Shoemaker Levy.
> Observe rings of Saturn, Jupiter ...
>
> This pencil is broken, I can see it is.
>    http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/geoopt/optpic/brokpen.jpg
> Believe that and I'll try to believe you've seen a star that varies
> intrinsically.

To my total lack of surprise you decline the challenge. Please supply
the reference for a peer reviewed article that confirms your viewpoint
regarding the non-existence of close binary pairs.

"ukastronomy"  wrote in message 
news:cf28b9d6-7165-48c1-8362-d1283fc26201@l6g2000prm.googlegroups.com...
On 27 Dec, 11:06, "Androcles" <Engin...@hogwarts.physics_a> wrote:
> "ukastronomy"  wrote in message
>
> news:06596a4a-a25f-4cdd-9139-919cdd496bf0@e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> : On 27 Dec, 09:39, "Androcles" <Engin...@hogwarts.physics_a> wrote:
> : > "ukastronomy"  wrote in message
> : >
> : 
>  >news:f8e085f5-b442-4b17-8e8c-2e875a81ef0b@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> : > : Outburst of SS AUR - December 2007
> : > :
> : > : Dwarf Novae are close binary systems with an accretion disc around 
> the
> : > : white dwarf component.
> : >
> : > Nonsense. There are no close binary systems. You wouldn't know
> : > a flare star from a cepheid.
> :
> : Please supply the reference for a peer reviewed article that confirms
> : your viewpoint regarding the non-existence of close binary pairs.
>
> Google for "Roche limit". Observe break up of Shoemaker Levy.
> Observe rings of Saturn, Jupiter ...
>
> This pencil is broken, I can see it is.
> http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/geoopt/optpic/brokpen.jpg
> Believe that and I'll try to believe you've seen a star that varies
> intrinsically.

To my total lack of surprise you decline the challenge. Please supply
the reference for a peer reviewed article that confirms your viewpoint
regarding the non-existence of close binary pairs.


Do you wildly imagine Roche's work is not peer reviewed?

Peer review counts for nothing anyway, Nature is not a democracy
to be voted on.
To my total lack of surprise you have done no investigation whatsoever
and are just another miserable non-thinking troll spouting the usual
crap from a text book. Eat shit, 10 billion flies can't be wrong.
Go play with your double stars and look at the pretty colours, little boy,
and take your imaginary close binaries that nobody has ever seen with you.

On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 04:09:42 -0800 (PST), ukastronomy
 wrote:

>To my total lack of surprise you decline the challenge. Please supply
>the reference for a peer reviewed article that confirms your viewpoint
>regarding the non-existence of close binary pairs.

Every minute you waste arguing with Androcles, who doesn't understand
the first thing about modern physics and chooses not to learn, is a
minute you could have spent doing some fun and useful science!

_________________________________________________

Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com

On 27 Dec, 15:48, Chris L Peterson  wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 04:09:42 -0800 (PST), ukastronomy
>
>  wrote:
> >To my total lack of surprise you decline the challenge. Please supply
> >the reference for a peer reviewed article that confirms your viewpoint
> >regarding the non-existence of close binary pairs.
>
> Every minute you waste arguing with Androcles, who doesn't understand
> the first thing about modern physics and chooses not to learn, is a
> minute you could have spent doing some fun and useful science!
>
> _________________________________________________
>
> Chris L Peterson
> Cloudbait Observatoryhttp://www.cloudbait.com

Yes you are correct. Androcles will join the other "nutters" in my
delete unread file.

Congratulations,

You've earned a permanent place in my killfile.  I don't know why it took me 
so long.

"Androcles" <Engineer@hogwarts.physics_a> wrote in message 
news:HbNcj.112032$cJ3.45797@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>
> "ukastronomy"  wrote in message
> news:cf28b9d6-7165-48c1-8362-d1283fc26201@l6g2000prm.googlegroups.com...
> On 27 Dec, 11:06, "Androcles" <Engin...@hogwarts.physics_a> wrote:
>> "ukastronomy"  wrote in message
>>
>> news:06596a4a-a25f-4cdd-9139-919cdd496bf0@e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>> : On 27 Dec, 09:39, "Androcles" <Engin...@hogwarts.physics_a> wrote:
>> : > "ukastronomy"  wrote in message
>> : >
>> :
>> 
>>  >news:f8e085f5-b442-4b17-8e8c-2e875a81ef0b@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>> : > : Outburst of SS AUR - December 2007
>> : > :
>> : > : Dwarf Novae are close binary systems with an accretion disc around
>> the
>> : > : white dwarf component.
>> : >
>> : > Nonsense. There are no close binary systems. You wouldn't know
>> : > a flare star from a cepheid.
>> :
>> : Please supply the reference for a peer reviewed article that confirms
>> : your viewpoint regarding the non-existence of close binary pairs.
>>
>> Google for "Roche limit". Observe break up of Shoemaker Levy.
>> Observe rings of Saturn, Jupiter ...
>>
>> This pencil is broken, I can see it is.
>> http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/geoopt/optpic/brokpen.jpg
>> Believe that and I'll try to believe you've seen a star that varies
>> intrinsically.
>
> To my total lack of surprise you decline the challenge. Please supply
> the reference for a peer reviewed article that confirms your viewpoint
> regarding the non-existence of close binary pairs.
>
>
> Do you wildly imagine Roche's work is not peer reviewed?
>
> Peer review counts for nothing anyway, Nature is not a democracy
> to be voted on.
> To my total lack of surprise you have done no investigation whatsoever
> and are just another miserable non-thinking troll spouting the usual
> crap from a text book. Eat shit, 10 billion flies can't be wrong.
> Go play with your double stars and look at the pretty colours, little boy,
> and take your imaginary close binaries that nobody has ever seen with you.
>
>
>
>

"Michael Asherman"  wrote in message
news:UM-dnbMiLPsfR-7anZ2dnUVZ_vqpnZ2d@comcast.com...
: Congratulations,
:
: You've earned a permanent place in my killfile.  I don't know


Of course you don't. People like you have your heads permanently up your
arse.
 *plonk*