Re: Why isn't manual transmission used on railway vehicles?
In message <_fmdnQmOQsudmevVnZ2dnUVZ8uOdnZ2d@posted.plusnet>, Mortimer
writes
>What is the profile of a dog clutch? Does it have rectangular castelations
>like two chess castles/rooks enmeshing top-to-top or does it have a sawtooth
>profile. I'd have thought that with a rectangular profile there was a 50:50
>chance of the clutches meeting peak-to-peak and trough-to-trough, whereas at
>least with a sawtooth the teeth will force each other to engage
>peak-to-trough except in the very unlikely event of the points of the teeth
>meeting absolutely level with each other.
Depends on the situation. On Voith transmissions on the early diesel
hydraulics the reverse was a uniform tessellation and the transmissions
had a "tooth on tooth" button to increase pressure on the dogs to try to
drive them home. Nine times out of 10, it was easier just to let the
locomotive roll a few inches to get into the correct direction gear.
On Mekydro transmission, the dogs had a higher leading edge with a
falling trail that allowed the dogs to be forced together and engage
once the speed difference had gone. It was quite a frightening
experience (the first time) to sit on a gearbox during the up change as
the ratchet noise was quite loud and as the gears engaged there was a
loud thump with a corresponding jump of the entire transmission casing.
--
Clive
date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:28:11 +0100
author: Clive
|