Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
misc
announce
answers
consultants
d-i-y
environment
environment.conservation
gov.agency.csa
gov.local
gov.social-security
gov.social-work
misc
philosophy.atheism
philosophy.humanism
philosophy.misc
radio.amateur
railway
sci.astronomy
sci.med.nursing
sci.med.pharmacy
sci.misc
sci.weather
singles
telecom
telecom.broadband
telecom.mobile
telecom.voip
test
transport
transport.air
transport.buses
transport.ferry
transport.london
transport.ride-sharing
  
 
date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 02:44:37 -0700 (PDT),    group: uk.railway        back       
Re: Why isn't manual transmission used on railway vehicles?   
On 10 jul, 02:17, D7666  wrote:
> On Jul 10, 12:54 am, Tony Polson  wrote:
>
> > Some older diesels had a cold start knob that gave a richer mixture.
>
> Ummm ... richer mixture ?
>
> Diesels have fuel injection pumps and no variable control over air -
> well at least thats how all the diesel engines I worked on are, and
> all those I am aware of now. (Turbos alter pressure, not mixture.)
>
> All cold start devices I knew of on Leyland or Ford or Cummins diesels
> were a pre-heater device that heated the fuel before entering the
> injection pump - diesel fuel tends to gel around zero deg C. Any
> exhaust clag is due to incorrect combustion where the fuel is still
> too cold, not due to a device working.
>
> And I've never come across any reference to altering air:fuel mix on
> any modern rail traction engine. Quite the reverse - modern electronic
> controls precisely maintain a constant value.
>

I had many cummins engined trucks in the seventies, cold start was by
KiGas pump to hand inject a small measured  quantity of ether (easy
start) into the injection manifold. There were no diesel volume
enhancement.
NM
date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 02:44:37 -0700 (PDT)   author:   NM

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us