Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
misc
announce
answers
consultants
d-i-y
environment
environment.conservation
gov.agency.csa
gov.local
gov.social-security
gov.social-work
misc
philosophy.atheism
philosophy.humanism
philosophy.misc
radio.amateur
railway
sci.astronomy
sci.med.nursing
sci.med.pharmacy
sci.misc
sci.weather
singles
telecom
telecom.broadband
telecom.mobile
telecom.voip
test
transport
transport.air
transport.buses
transport.ferry
transport.london
transport.ride-sharing
  
 
date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 02:06:00 -0700 (PDT),    group: uk.railway        back       
Re: BBC - New delay for troubled rail firm GC   
Tony Polson wrote:

> "John Salmon"  wrote:
> >
> >> Presumably they are trying to serve the whole of Teesside, but they can't
> >> call at Middlesbrough or Thornaby without a reversal, so the choice is
> >> between Billingham, Stockton, Eaglescliffe or perhaps (just over the old
> >> county boundary) Yarm.  I don't know why they chose Eaglescliffe...
> >
> >Answering my own implied question, I suppose Eaglescliffe has the best
> >'connectivity' of those four if they are expecting passengers to arrive by
> >local train.  It doesn't have good car parking, though.
>
>
> I think Eaglescliffe was chosen for them.
>
> Certainly, in the case of Yarm, Northern objected strongly.

Eaglescliffe is the only viable option for a Teesside stop. The only
one with a long enough platform. The only one with good road access
(the A66 is a mile away) and the only one with a car park. Its not a
great station by any means but it handles the traffic generated by GC
which was a dozen or so pax last time I used them.
date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 02:06:00 -0700 (PDT)   author:   Rochdale Pioneers

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us