Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
misc
announce
answers
consultants
d-i-y
environment
environment.conservation
gov.agency.csa
gov.local
gov.social-security
gov.social-work
misc
philosophy.atheism
philosophy.humanism
philosophy.misc
radio.amateur
railway
sci.astronomy
sci.med.nursing
sci.med.pharmacy
sci.misc
sci.weather
singles
telecom
telecom.broadband
telecom.mobile
telecom.voip
test
transport
transport.air
transport.buses
transport.ferry
transport.london
transport.ride-sharing
  
 
date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:54:49 +0100,    group: uk.railway        back       
Re: Proposed use of the ELR as a Bury - Manchester Commuter Route   
On Thu, 03 Jul 2008 21:00:01 +0100, Charlie Hulme wrote in
<9dabk.182807$aE7.55301@newsfe16.ams2>, seen in uk.railway:
> Ross wrote:
> 
> > The cost of doing all that takes
> > it well out of the purview of anything a PTE could possibly afford to
> > subsidise, given that (realistically) the "subsidy" will have to cover
> > the upgrade, the leasing costs and all the other operating costs for a
> > very long time to come.
> 
> How would that compare with the costs of reopening the Ebbw 
> Vale or Alloa lines? Oh, I forgot, they are not in this country.

Got it in one.

They are also not (directly) funded by local taxpayers, as anything a
PTE funds will be.

-- 
Ross. 
* Opinions are my own; my employer has disowned me again.
* Reply-to will bounce. Replace the junk-trap with my first name to e-mail me.

AD: <http://www.merciacharters.co.uk> for rail enthusiast tours in Europe
date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:54:49 +0100   author:   Ross

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us