Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
misc
announce
answers
consultants
d-i-y
environment
environment.conservation
gov.agency.csa
gov.local
gov.social-security
gov.social-work
misc
philosophy.atheism
philosophy.humanism
philosophy.misc
radio.amateur
railway
sci.astronomy
sci.med.nursing
sci.med.pharmacy
sci.misc
sci.weather
singles
telecom
telecom.broadband
telecom.mobile
telecom.voip
test
transport
transport.air
transport.buses
transport.ferry
transport.london
transport.ride-sharing
  
 
date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 08:26:22 -0700 (PDT),    group: uk.railway        back       
Re: Travelling short: Would this be wrong, and would I get caught?   
Ross wrote:

> What we should have done back in BR days was gone totally ATB
> ticketing (as per SNCB), with the time restrictions printed on the
> ticket in plain English:
> "On your outward journey, you cannot use this ticket to travel to
> London before 10:00"
> "On your return journey, you cannot use this ticket to leave London
> between 15:30 and 18:30"
>
> But it's too late for that now.

Something like that could be printed on a separate bit of card now.
But the problem is that it isn't always as simple as you have above -
the full set of restrictions are somewhat more complicated in most
cases.

The solution is probably to simplify them[1] *and* to provide a
printout.

[1] There has been a progressive process of simplifying (removing)
permitted routes as well.  Once upon a time, I'm pretty sure Preston-
Euston allowed a diversion via Liverpool, and Manchester-Euston
allowed one via the Chiltern Line.  Neither are allowed any more -
it's basically just WCML and MML, and if you're coming from Preston
not even the latter.

Neil
date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 08:26:22 -0700 (PDT)   author:   Neil Williams

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us