Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
misc
announce
answers
consultants
d-i-y
environment
environment.conservation
gov.agency.csa
gov.local
gov.social-security
gov.social-work
misc
philosophy.atheism
philosophy.humanism
philosophy.misc
radio.amateur
railway
sci.astronomy
sci.med.nursing
sci.med.pharmacy
sci.misc
sci.weather
singles
telecom
telecom.broadband
telecom.mobile
telecom.voip
test
transport
transport.air
transport.buses
transport.ferry
transport.london
transport.ride-sharing
  
 
date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 11:20:08 +0000 (UTC),    group: uk.railway        back       
Re: Cyclist crashes onto track   
In article <hi2bk.63074$Kb.16315@newsfe29.ams2>,
Stephen  wrote:
>So what you're saying is that the motorist should stump up yet more cash to 
>fund the cycle paths? Its like blackmail saying we'll keep getting in your 
>way until you give us the cycle paths. So why can't the money be raised from 
>cyclists if they choose to use a bicycle and want their exclusive bit to 
>cycle on? 

I'd be surprised if the majority of cyclists using their bikes for
commutes didn't also own a car (or m/cycle) on which they'll be paying
road 'tax' but which won't be wearing out the road etc. Personally I
can't see any reason why the money can't be used for cyclists.
date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 11:20:08 +0000 (UTC)   author:   Mike Civil

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us