|
|
|
date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 15:31:18 -0700 (PDT),
group: uk.radio.amateur
back
Re: New repeater on 145.975?
On 16 Jul, 23:23, Spike <Aero.Spike@S&T.invalid> wrote:
> GM0ONX wrote:
> >> PS: Your sig separator is broken.
>
> >I'll survive!
>
> Oh, I'm sure you will but that isn't the issue. It looks like
> confirming you're a fuckwit, though, so it might be worth attending
> to.
>
> --
>
> from
> Aero Spike
Feel better for that little rant?
date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 15:31:18 -0700 (PDT)
author: GM0ONX
|
Re: New repeater on 145.975?
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:16:05 +0100, HighlandObserver@gmail.com wrote:
>As a Beta tester for 3,4 and maybe 5 I hope you go to Hell ;-)
I do. As often as I can spare the time... The damned place won't run
itself and you just can't get reliable deputies.
Nick
date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:10:23 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: New repeater on 145.975?
lucifer@eternal-flames.gov wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:16:05 +0100, HighlandObserver@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>> As a Beta tester for 3,4 and maybe 5 I hope you go to Hell ;-)
>
> I do. As often as I can spare the time... The damned place won't run
> itself and you just can't get reliable deputies.
Well, you do employ numpty CBers, so what do you expect?
date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:39:21 -0400
author: class_a
|
Re: New repeater on 145.975?
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 22:42:12 +0100, "The Legend Returns" <trabant
owners club@Nicks place.comco> wrote:
>>>Quite easily....it isn't Free Agent ;-)
>>
>> Neither is mine... I didn't pay for it. ;-)
>
>There's not much you do pay for, Me Lord, including your staff...
>
>tox
Why pay for something which you can get free?
Paying for something such as Agent when you can avoid doing so, only
serves to salve the conscience of the purchaser and make him feel
good.
I have no conscience and where would be the point in me feeling good?
Nick.
date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 07:12:32 +0100
author: unknown
|
|
|