On 16 Jul, 23:06, Spike <Aero.Spike@S&T.invalid> wrote:
> GM0ONX wrote:
> >On 16 Jul, 22:51, Spike <Aero.Spike@S&T.invalid> wrote:
> >> Len GM0ONX wrote:
> >> >luci...@eternal-flames.gov wrote:
> >> >> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:51:00 퍝, Len GM0ONX 
> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >>> Say no morehttp://www.dx.ardi.lv/VHF-bandplans.pdf
>
> >> >> But unless and until, the contents of that document are added to the
> >> >> Schedule of the UK amateur licence, it is not legally enforceable in
> >> >> the UK.
>
> >> >> Nick.
>
> >> >Your right Nick, but that wasn't my point. My point was it is nowt to It
> >> >is a IARU matter.
>
> >> Only a week or two ago you were defending the RSGB against the charge
> >> that thay are now irrelevant, by saying such things as
> >> "...<gasp>...but who would liaise with the IARU... <cough>
> >> <splutter>...".
>
> >> Now it turns out you don't seem to know what the limits of the RSGB or
> >> the IARU actually are. Amazing. Not.
>
> >> --
>

>
> PS: Your sig separator is broken.
>
> --
>
>  from
>  Aero Spike- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted te