Len GM0ONX wrote:

>lucifer@eternal-flames.gov wrote:
>> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:51:00 +0100, Len GM0ONX 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Say no more http://www.dx.ardi.lv/VHF-bandplans.pdf
>> 
>> But unless and until, the contents of that document are added to the
>> Schedule of the UK amateur licence, it is not legally enforceable in
>> the UK.
>> 
>> Nick.
>> 
>Your right Nick, but that wasn't my point. My point was it is nowt to It 
>is a IARU matter.

Only a week or two ago you were defending the RSGB against the charge
that thay are now irrelevant, by saying such things as
"...<gasp>...but who would liaise with the IARU... <cough>
<splutter>...".

Now it turns out you don't seem to know what the limits of the RSGB or
the IARU actually are. Amazing. Not.


-- 

 from
 Aero Spike

GM0ONX wrote:

>On 16 Jul, 22:51, Spike <Aero.Spike@S&T.invalid> wrote:
>> Len GM0ONX wrote:
>> >luci...@eternal-flames.gov wrote:
>> >> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:51:00 +0100, Len GM0ONX 
>> >> wrote:
>>
>> >>> Say no morehttp://www.dx.ardi.lv/VHF-bandplans.pdf
>>
>> >> But unless and until, the contents of that document are added to the
>> >> Schedule of the UK amateur licence, it is not legally enforceable in
>> >> the UK.
>>
>> >> Nick.
>>
>> >Your right Nick, but that wasn't my point. My point was it is nowt to It
>> >is a IARU matter.
>>
>> Only a week or two ago you were defending the RSGB against the charge
>> that thay are now irrelevant, by saying such things as
>> "...<gasp>...but who would liaise with the IARU... <cough>
>> <splutter>...".
>>
>> Now it turns out you don't seem to know what the limits of the RSGB or
>> the IARU actually are. Amazing. Not.
>>
>> --
>>
>>  from
>>  Aero Spike
>
>Not at all, just correcting another inaccurate anti RSGB rant ;-)

Oh, I thought you were the one having the rant.....

PS: Your sig separator is broken.


-- 

 from
 Aero Spike

GM0ONX wrote:

>> PS: Your sig separator is broken.
>
>I'll survive!

Oh, I'm sure you will but that isn't the issue. It looks like
confirming you're a fuckwit, though, so it might be worth attending
to.


-- 

 from
 Aero Spike

"Spike" <Aero.Spike@S&T.invalid> wrote in message 
news:43ts74hnna318ajjne8bjd0jjfre88t80c@4ax.com...
>
> GM0ONX wrote:
>
>>> PS: Your sig separator is broken.
>>
>>I'll survive!
>
> Oh, I'm sure you will but that isn't the issue. It looks like
> confirming you're a fuckwit, though, so it might be worth attending
> to.
>
>
wish he would...it would save me putting in all those   >   .........

"Jim Stewart....."  wrote in message 
news:odBfk.6869$wb5.6567@newsfe29.ams2...
>
> "Spike" <Aero.Spike@S&T.invalid> wrote in message 
> news:43ts74hnna318ajjne8bjd0jjfre88t80c@4ax.com...
>>
>> GM0ONX wrote:
>>
>>>> PS: Your sig separator is broken.
>>>
>>>I'll survive!
>>
>> Oh, I'm sure you will but that isn't the issue. It looks like
>> confirming you're a fuckwit, though, so it might be worth attending
>> to.
>>
>>
> wish he would...it would save me putting in all those   >   .........
>
which are needed so big Mannion can figure out who said what .....before he 
makes a tit of himself again.....

"GM0ONX"  wrote in message 
news:9491c291-f461-40b3-8e1a-3565d71f58c8@y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
On 16 Jul, 23:23, Spike <Aero.Spike@S&T.invalid> wrote:
> GM0ONX wrote:
> >> PS: Your sig separator is broken.
>
> >I'll survive!
>
> Oh, I'm sure you will but that isn't the issue. It looks like
> confirming you're a fuckwit, though, so it might be worth attending
> to.
>
> --
>
> from
> Aero Spike

Feel better for that little rant?

this is what happens if I don't .........

"Jim Stewart....."  wrote in message 
news:ohBfk.6871$wb5.3194@newsfe29.ams2...
>
> "GM0ONX"  wrote in message 
> news:9491c291-f461-40b3-8e1a-3565d71f58c8@y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> On 16 Jul, 23:23, Spike <Aero.Spike@S&T.invalid> wrote:
>> GM0ONX wrote:
>> >> PS: Your sig separator is broken.
>>
>> >I'll survive!
>>
>> Oh, I'm sure you will but that isn't the issue. It looks like
>> confirming you're a fuckwit, though, so it might be worth attending
>> to.
>>
>> --
>>
>> from
>> Aero Spike
>
> Feel better for that little rant?
>
> this is what happens if I don't .........
>

looks like I said that .............

GM0ONX wrote:

>On 16 Jul, 23:23, Spike <Aero.Spike@S&T.invalid> wrote:
>> GM0ONX wrote:
>> >> PS: Your sig separator is broken.
>>
>> >I'll survive!
>>
>> Oh, I'm sure you will but that isn't the issue. It looks like
>> confirming you're a fuckwit, though, so it might be worth attending
>> to.
>>
>> --
>>
>>  from
>>  Aero Spike
>
>Feel better for that little rant?

Your sig separator is *still* broken. 

So, apart from recently demonstrating that you knew nothing of the
RSGB's recent history (read: mendacity, self-interest), OFCOM's recent
history (read: democratic consultations), or what the IARU can and
cannot do, you confirm that you are both antisocial and ignorant.

IOW, a fuckwit.

Have a nice day, if you manage to get out of bed successfully.


-- 

 from
 Aero Spike

mick wrote:

>On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 08:06:19 +0100, Spike wrote:
>
><snip>
>> 
>> Your sig separator is *still* broken.
>> 
>> So, apart from recently demonstrating that you knew nothing of the
>> RSGB's recent history (read: mendacity, self-interest), OFCOM's recent
>> history (read: democratic consultations), or what the IARU can and
>> cannot do, you confirm that you are both antisocial and ignorant.
>> 
>> IOW, a fuckwit.
>> 
>> Have a nice day, if you manage to get out of bed successfully.
>
><grin>
>
>I've not been able to follow this jolly little banter. I assume that said 
>personage is using google groups. I thought that radio amateurs were 
>intelligent enough to realise that that's a bad idea! OTOH perhaps he's 
>selling trainers & fake watches in his spare time...   ;-)
>
>To GG person: the sig seperator is <dash> <dash> <space> and the space is 
>important!

The problem lies with his news client, which is not separating the sig
from the message on 'reply'; or just perhaps he's doing a very poor
cut-and-paste job. My sig is properly configured - it's quite
straightforward, as you illustrate.


-- 

 from
 Aero Spike

mick wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 08:06:19 +0100, Spike wrote:
> 
> <snip>
>> Your sig separator is *still* broken.
>>
>> So, apart from recently demonstrating that you knew nothing of the
>> RSGB's recent history (read: mendacity, self-interest), OFCOM's recent
>> history (read: democratic consultations), or what the IARU can and
>> cannot do, you confirm that you are both antisocial and ignorant.
>>
>> IOW, a fuckwit.
>>
>> Have a nice day, if you manage to get out of bed successfully.
> 
> 
> <grin>
> 
> I've not been able to follow this jolly little banter. I assume that said 
> personage is using google groups. I thought that radio amateurs were 
> intelligent enough to realise that that's a bad idea! OTOH perhaps he's 
> selling trainers & fake watches in his spare time...   ;-)
> 
> To GG person: the sig seperator is <dash> <dash> <space> and the space is 
> important!
> 

It depends were I am posting from. I use googlegroups when I am not at 
my own PC and thunderbird/albasani when I am.

:-)

Len GM0ONX wrote:

>mick wrote:
>
>> I've not been able to follow this jolly little banter. I assume that said 
>> personage is using google groups. I thought that radio amateurs were 
>> intelligent enough to realise that that's a bad idea! OTOH perhaps he's 
>> selling trainers & fake watches in his spare time...   ;-)
>> 
>> To GG person: the sig seperator is <dash> <dash> <space> and the space is 
>> important!
>
>It depends were I am posting from. I use googlegroups 

That's one of your problems, right there.

>when I am not at my own PC and thunderbird/albasani when I am.

Sometimes, paying for a product can result in obtaining superior
performance. e.g. Agent newsreader and news.individual.net.

I realise that for you, paying for something that might otherwise be
'free' might be a foreign concept, but I see no reason why others
should suffer as a result of such a skinflint approach.

-- 

 from
 Aero Spike

On Jul 17, 10:41 am, Spike <Aero.Spike@S&T.invalid> wrote:
> Len GM0ONX wrote:
> >mick wrote:
>
> >> I've not been able to follow this jolly little banter. I assume that said
> >> personage is using google groups. I thought that radio amateurs were
> >> intelligent enough to realise that that's a bad idea! OTOH perhaps he's
> >> selling trainers & fake watches in his spare time...   ;-)
>
> >> To GG person: the sig seperator is <dash> <dash> <space> and the space is
> >> important!
>
> >It depends were I am posting from. I use googlegroups
>
> That's one of your problems, right there.
>
> >when I am not at my own PC and thunderbird/albasani when I am.
>
> Sometimes, paying for a product can result in obtaining superior
> performance. e.g. Agent newsreader and news.individual.net.
>
> I realise that for you, paying for something that might otherwise be
> 'free' might be a foreign concept, but I see no reason why others
> should suffer as a result of such a skinflint approach.
>
> --
>
>  from
>  Aero Spike

You say being a 'skinflint' as if it’s a bad thing!  I would NOT wish
to spend ANY money to access this NG, it is just not that important to
me. It is just something I do when I’m bored with the TV, when I'm
tuning round the bands on the radio and at lunch time at work. Its
nothing of any REAL importance that would require money to be spent.

PAY to hear the views expressed on here, are you serious!!!! The very
thought of it!!!