|
|
|
date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 10:53:36 +0100,
group: uk.radio.amateur
back
Re: Anyone else building variable caps?
On Mon, 7 Jul 2008 19:47:36 +0100, "12 WPM Class A"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>"Len GM0ONX" wrote in message
>news:g4to12$u29$1@news.albasani.net...
>> 12 WPM Class A wrote:
>>> "Jimbo ..." wrote in message
>>> news:_wrck.96377$GF6.75026@newsfe27.ams2...
>>>>> Q. Why do not local government employees read the newspaper in the
>>>>> morning?
>>>>> A. Because that'd leave them with nothing to do in the afternoon.
>>>> that was below the belt...I never read newspapers.......
>>> "Practically Witless" w*nkmags published by your partner-in-court Cap'n
>>> Hook?
>> This is the man that goes on about complaining about gratuitous rudeness
>> and citing gentlemanly behaviour yet he describes a disabled radio amateur
>> that has never posted here as captain hook. What gratuitous rudeness by
>> said person brought on that remark by you?
>
>To use a bit of your own gratuitous rudeness that you directed at me
>earlier today, you're not living in the real world, OM.
>
>Those who put themselves in self-important positions, be they
>representatives of the RSCB, prime ministers or editors of
>national journals will come in for criticism and parody.
>
Then you'll have no problem when it's open season on hypocritical,
self-appointed 'maintainers of standards' whose behaviour is far from
gentlemanly.
date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 10:53:36 +0100
author: Custos Custodum
|
Re: Anyone else building variable caps?
On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 10:53:36 +0100, Custos Custodum wrote:
>Then you'll have no problem when it's open season on hypocritical,
>self-appointed 'maintainers of standards' whose behaviour is far from
>gentlemanly.
But I think he will
date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 10:58:28 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Anyone else building variable caps?
Custos Custodum wrote:
>On Mon, 7 Jul 2008 19:47:36 +0100, "12 WPM Class A"
><invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>>
>>Those who put themselves in self-important positions, be they
>>representatives of the RSCB, prime ministers or editors of
>>national journals will come in for criticism and parody.
>>
>Then you'll have no problem when it's open season on hypocritical,
>self-appointed 'maintainers of standards' whose behaviour is far from
>gentlemanly.
ROFL
Well said.
--
from
Aero Spike
date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 12:50:15 +0100
author: Spike Aero.Spike@S&T.invalid
|
Re: Anyone else building variable caps?
work@getajob.com wrote:
>On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 10:53:36 +0100, Custos Custodum wrote:
>
>>Then you'll have no problem when it's open season on hypocritical,
>>self-appointed 'maintainers of standards' whose behaviour is far from
>>gentlemanly.
>
>But I think he will
He's never managed to grasp the meaning of the adage "what's sauce for
the goose is sauce for the gander"; or perhaps he doesn't want to, as
he'd have to play grown-up games instead.
--
from
Aero Spike
"I have stated my opinion. Note that I am not obliged to produce
evidence for the opinions that I hold. I have stated my opinion
and there is no room for further opinionating or opining"
date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 12:51:54 +0100
author: Spike Aero.Spike@S&T.invalid
|
|
|