|
|
|
date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 22:28:18 +0100,
group: uk.radio.amateur
back
Re: Ping Brian.
On Mon, 7 Jul 2008 22:21:10 +0100, "12 WPM Class A" <invalid@invalid.invalid>
wrote:
>Radio Hammery
We are still waiting for your answer on a definition of Radio Hammery.
Also the technical merit of CW over UHF+ RF design and construction OM
date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 22:28:18 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Ping Brian.
wrote in message
news:ig2574ln6liqk32rvadnoh1vla4ovf8jpl@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 7 Jul 2008 22:21:10 +0100, "12 WPM Class A"
> <invalid@invalid.invalid>
> wrote:
>>Radio Hammery
> We are still waiting for your answer on a definition of Radio Hammery.
Do you mean an answer to a question, OM, because definitions assert
facts and do not expect an answer?
date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 22:36:02 +0100
author: 12 WPM Class A lid
|
Re: Ping Brian.
On Mon, 7 Jul 2008 22:36:02 +0100, "12 WPM Class A" <invalid@invalid.invalid>
wrote:
> wrote in message
>news:ig2574ln6liqk32rvadnoh1vla4ovf8jpl@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 7 Jul 2008 22:21:10 +0100, "12 WPM Class A"
>> <invalid@invalid.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>>Radio Hammery
>> We are still waiting for your answer on a definition of Radio Hammery.
>
>Do you mean an answer to a question, OM, because definitions assert
>facts and do not expect an answer?
You were previously asked, What is Radio Hammery?
Also I note you failed again in a dissertation on the technical merit of CW
over UHF+ RF design and construction.
/* Irony On
I find it awfully rude the an OM of such obvious stature can not pass on his
wealth of knowledge.
/* Irony Off
PS partial quoting does you no favours OM
date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 22:42:33 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Ping Brian.
Dave@Nothere.com wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jul 2008 22:36:02 +0100, "12 WPM Class A" <invalid@invalid.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> wrote in message
>> news:ig2574ln6liqk32rvadnoh1vla4ovf8jpl@4ax.com...
>>> On Mon, 7 Jul 2008 22:21:10 +0100, "12 WPM Class A"
>>> <invalid@invalid.invalid>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Radio Hammery
>>> We are still waiting for your answer on a definition of Radio Hammery.
>> Do you mean an answer to a question, OM, because definitions assert
>> facts and do not expect an answer?
>
> You were previously asked, What is Radio Hammery?
>
> Also I note you failed again in a dissertation on the technical merit of CW
> over UHF+ RF design and construction.
>
> /* Irony On
> I find it awfully rude the an OM of such obvious stature can not pass on his
> wealth of knowledge.
> /* Irony Off
>
> PS partial quoting does you no favours OM
He'll avoid the question by saying 'cannot' is one word or something
else to wriggle out the answer. ;o)
date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 22:48:41 +0100
author: Len GM0ONX
|
Re: Ping Brian.
>He'll avoid the question by saying 'cannot' is one word or something
>else to wriggle out the answer. ;o)
He is doing a good job of enjoying it.
I'm off to 80m then bed.
date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 22:54:05 +0100
author: unknown
|
Re: Ping Brian.
Dave@Nothere.com wrote:
>> He'll avoid the question by saying 'cannot' is one word or something
>> else to wriggle out the answer. ;o)
>
> He is doing a good job of enjoying it.
>
> I'm off to 80m then bed.
Its very noisy tonight I think you'll be getting an early night!
date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 23:43:23 +0100
author: Len GM0ONX
|
|
|