On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 21:20:54 +0100, "12 WPM Class A"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:

>"Rambo"  wrote in message 
>news:47nn64hp6hao6t3dgljaut35fgrukn5cs8@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 18:41:49 +0100, "12 WPM Class A"
>> <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>I can only go on your history of posting, as below. If you have
>>>told lies, then any quotation of you will be inaccurate because
>>>of those lies, so you must look to yourself for blame.
>> Frankly I don't care whether you believe me or not. I have the piece
>> of paper with BTECH final written on it, its kept me in continuous
>> employment for the last 36 years which more than you have achieved I
>> hear.
>
>And there, right on cue, is your continuing trail of gratuitous abuse, which
>ISTR is where we came in.
>
>"Once an M3, always an M3" is proven again, and it is particularly proven
>in the case of M3LFP.
>
>If it had been me, I'd have known whether I had an HND (which is
>a proper course for engineers who did not have the social wherewithal to
>go to university) or an HNC (which is for uppity technicians with childish 
>traits).
>
>Lack of clarity in that area implies a lack of honesty.
>
As an apprentice for the good old PO telecoms

3 yrs c&g at peoples college nottm, 1973 - 1976

BTech final (HND) trent poly (nottingham 1977) ....

clear enough for you OM

"Rambo"  wrote in message 
news:hcun649ftfrmsl0si2gmg5qr8angtnlere@4ax.com...
> As an apprentice for the good old PO telecoms
> 3 yrs c&g at peoples college nottm, 1973 - 1976
> BTech final (HND) trent poly (nottingham 1977) ....
> clear enough for you OM

With your claimed technical background, it is disgraceful that you took
out a licence targeted at 6-year-old children and have boasted that you
intend to stay at that level.

On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 07:46:47 +0100, "12 WPM Class A"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:

>"Rambo"  wrote in message 
>news:hcun649ftfrmsl0si2gmg5qr8angtnlere@4ax.com...
>> As an apprentice for the good old PO telecoms
>> 3 yrs c&g at peoples college nottm, 1973 - 1976
>> BTech final (HND) trent poly (nottingham 1977) ....
>> clear enough for you OM
>
>With your claimed technical background, it is disgraceful that you took
>out a licence targeted at 6-year-old children and have boasted that you
>intend to stay at that level.
That licence is compulsory as I've stated earlier. I have since
progressed to a full licence.

"Rambo"  wrote in message 
news:viqp64dpjcn5sidlnrjcq1759j4f4g6l31@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 07:46:47 +0100, "12 WPM Class A"
> <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>With your claimed technical background, it is disgraceful that you took
>>out a licence targeted at 6-year-old children and have boasted that you
>>intend to stay at that level.
> That licence is compulsory as I've stated earlier. I have since
> progressed to a full licence.

There is no compulsion to take out a licence under the gangrenous
degeneration that is the M3/CB Fools' Licence scheme.

If, as you say, you have moved on then your habit of gratuitous
rudeness would seem to lend weight to the adage, "Once an M3,
always an M3"

On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 16:24:52 +0100, "12 WPM Class A"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:

>"Rambo"  wrote in message 
>news:viqp64dpjcn5sidlnrjcq1759j4f4g6l31@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 07:46:47 +0100, "12 WPM Class A"
>> <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>With your claimed technical background, it is disgraceful that you took
>>>out a licence targeted at 6-year-old children and have boasted that you
>>>intend to stay at that level.
>> That licence is compulsory as I've stated earlier. I have since
>> progressed to a full licence.
>
>There is no compulsion to take out a licence under the gangrenous
>degeneration that is the M3/CB Fools' Licence scheme.
>
Since the RAE no longer exists, how else can one become a licensed
Radio Amateur? Your logic is flawed.

"Rambo"  wrote in message 
news:66tp64hfu0uoubfl4sluevkqr07ljotcv7@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 16:24:52 +0100, "12 WPM Class A"
> <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>"Rambo"  wrote in message
>>news:viqp64dpjcn5sidlnrjcq1759j4f4g6l31@4ax.com...
>>> On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 07:46:47 +0100, "12 WPM Class A"
>>> <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>With your claimed technical background, it is disgraceful that you took
>>>>out a licence targeted at 6-year-old children and have boasted that you
>>>>intend to stay at that level.
>>> That licence is compulsory as I've stated earlier. I have since
>>> progressed to a full licence.
>>There is no compulsion to take out a licence under the gangrenous
>>degeneration that is the M3/CB Fools' Licence scheme.
> Since the RAE no longer exists, how else can one become a licensed
> Radio Amateur? Your logic is flawed.

You take the M3/CB Fools' exam, followed by the Idiots' exam
and then the Retards' exam.

Then, and only then, do you take out a licence

There is no compulsion to take out a licence under the gangrenous
degeneration that is the M3/CB Fools' Licence scheme.

Licences come at the end of a qualification exercise and not at
the beginning.

Not only do you display your ignorance about the difference between
an exam and a licence, you continue to utter gratuitous rude remarks
thus adding weight to the adage, "Once an M3, always an M3".

On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 16:56:04 +0100, "12 WPM Class A"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:

>"Rambo"  wrote in message 
>news:66tp64hfu0uoubfl4sluevkqr07ljotcv7@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 16:24:52 +0100, "12 WPM Class A"
>> <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>"Rambo"  wrote in message
>>>news:viqp64dpjcn5sidlnrjcq1759j4f4g6l31@4ax.com...
>>>> On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 07:46:47 +0100, "12 WPM Class A"
>>>> <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>With your claimed technical background, it is disgraceful that you took
>>>>>out a licence targeted at 6-year-old children and have boasted that you
>>>>>intend to stay at that level.
>>>> That licence is compulsory as I've stated earlier. I have since
>>>> progressed to a full licence.
>>>There is no compulsion to take out a licence under the gangrenous
>>>degeneration that is the M3/CB Fools' Licence scheme.
>> Since the RAE no longer exists, how else can one become a licensed
>> Radio Amateur? Your logic is flawed.
>
>You take the M3/CB Fools' exam, followed by the Idiots' exam
>and then the Retards' exam.
>
>Then, and only then, do you take out a licence
>
>There is no compulsion to take out a licence under the gangrenous
>>
>Not only do you display your ignorance about the difference between
>an exam and a licence, you continue to utter gratuitous rude remarks
>thudegeneration that is the M3/CB Fools' Licence scheme.
>
>Licences come at the end of a qualification exercise and not at
>the beginning.

 And the Foundation Course is a Qualification Exercise. 

To quote Ofcomm..."A licence is an authority granted by Ofcom
authorising a named person (or persons) to install or use radio
equipment in a clearly defined way.

The foundation licence parameters are listed on page 9 of the
handbook.

www.ofcom.org.uk/radiocomms/ifi/tech/interface_req/ir2028.pdf

"12 WPM Class A" <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote in message 
news:g4isqm$5ss$1@news.albasani.net...
> "Rambo"  wrote in message 
> news:66tp64hfu0uoubfl4sluevkqr07ljotcv7@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 16:24:52 +0100, "12 WPM Class A"
>> <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>"Rambo"  wrote in message
>>>news:viqp64dpjcn5sidlnrjcq1759j4f4g6l31@4ax.com...
>>>> On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 07:46:47 +0100, "12 WPM Class A"
>>>> <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>With your claimed technical background, it is disgraceful that you took
>>>>>out a licence targeted at 6-year-old children and have boasted that you
>>>>>intend to stay at that level.
>>>> That licence is compulsory as I've stated earlier. I have since
>>>> progressed to a full licence.
>>>There is no compulsion to take out a licence under the gangrenous
>>>degeneration that is the M3/CB Fools' Licence scheme.
>> Since the RAE no longer exists, how else can one become a licensed
>> Radio Amateur? Your logic is flawed.
>
> You take the M3/CB Fools' exam, followed by the Idiots' exam
> and then the Retards' exam.
>
> Then, and only then, do you take out a licence
>
> There is no compulsion to take out a licence under the gangrenous
> degeneration that is the M3/CB Fools' Licence scheme.
>
> Licences come at the end of a qualification exercise and not at
> the beginning.
>
> Not only do you display your ignorance about the difference between
> an exam and a licence, you continue to utter gratuitous rude remarks
> thus adding weight to the adage, "Once an M3, always an M3".
>
>
>BUZZZZZZZZZZZ!!

>>You take the M3/CB Fools' exam, followed by the Idiots' exam
>>and then the Retards' exam.
>>
>>Then, and only then, do you take out a licence
>>
>>There is no compulsion to take out a licence under the gangrenous
>>>
>>Not only do you display your ignorance about the difference between
>>an exam and a licence, you continue to utter gratuitous rude remarks
>>thudegeneration that is the M3/CB Fools' Licence scheme.
>>
>>Licences come at the end of a qualification exercise and not at
>>the beginning.
>
> And the Foundation Course is a Qualification Exercise.
>
> To quote Ofcomm..."A licence is an authority granted by Ofcom
> authorising a named person (or persons) to install or use radio
> equipment in a clearly defined way.
>
> The foundation licence parameters are listed on page 9 of the
> handbook.
>
> www.ofcom.org.uk/radiocomms/ifi/tech/interface_req/ir2028.pdf

Gareth is perfectly correct; just because you pass an exam does not mean 
that you automatically get a licence. You may be qualified to apply for a 
licence but that is totally different to actually being granted one.

The Interface Requirement that you cite is totally irrelevant, since it only 
relates to actual licence holders.

You may pass as many exams as you like, but you will not get a licence until 
you actually apply for one, (or not). It is perfectly possible to pass all 3 
exams in quick succession and only then apply for a Full Licence, and so you 
will have never been a foundation or intermediate licence holder.

73
Jeff

On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 08:36:27 +0100, "Jeff"  wrote:

>
>>>You take the M3/CB Fools' exam, followed by the Idiots' exam
>>>and then the Retards' exam.
>>>
>>>Then, and only then, do you take out a licence
>>>
>>>There is no compulsion to take out a licence under the gangrenous
>>>>
>>>Not only do you display your ignorance about the difference between
>>>an exam and a licence, you continue to utter gratuitous rude remarks
>>>thudegeneration that is the M3/CB Fools' Licence scheme.
>>>
>>>Licences come at the end of a qualification exercise and not at
>>>the beginning.
>>
>> And the Foundation Course is a Qualification Exercise.
>>
>> To quote Ofcomm..."A licence is an authority granted by Ofcom
>> authorising a named person (or persons) to install or use radio
>> equipment in a clearly defined way.
>>
>> The foundation licence parameters are listed on page 9 of the
>> handbook.
>>
>> www.ofcom.org.uk/radiocomms/ifi/tech/interface_req/ir2028.pdf
>
>Gareth is perfectly correct; just because you pass an exam does not mean 
>that you automatically get a licence. You may be qualified to apply for a 
>licence but that is totally different to actually being granted one.
>
>The Interface Requirement that you cite is totally irrelevant, since it only 
>relates to actual licence holders.
>
>You may pass as many exams as you like, but you will not get a licence until 
>you actually apply for one, (or not). It is perfectly possible to pass all 3 
>exams in quick succession and only then apply for a Full Licence, and so you 
>will have never been a foundation or intermediate licence holder.
>
>73
>Jeff 
>
On that technicallity I am happy to concede that point. However it a
rather unlikley scenario.

On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 00:10:07 +0100, "Spot_the_Looney!"
 wrote:

>
>"12 WPM Class A" <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote in message 
>news:g4isqm$5ss$1@news.albasani.net...
>> "Rambo"  wrote in message 
>> news:66tp64hfu0uoubfl4sluevkqr07ljotcv7@4ax.com...
>>> On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 16:24:52 +0100, "12 WPM Class A"
>>> <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>"Rambo"  wrote in message
>>>>news:viqp64dpjcn5sidlnrjcq1759j4f4g6l31@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 07:46:47 +0100, "12 WPM Class A"
>>>>> <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>With your claimed technical background, it is disgraceful that you took
>>>>>>out a licence targeted at 6-year-old children and have boasted that you
>>>>>>intend to stay at that level.
>>>>> That licence is compulsory as I've stated earlier. I have since
>>>>> progressed to a full licence.
>>>>There is no compulsion to take out a licence under the gangrenous
>>>>degeneration that is the M3/CB Fools' Licence scheme.
>>> Since the RAE no longer exists, how else can one become a licensed
>>> Radio Amateur? Your logic is flawed.
>>
>> You take the M3/CB Fools' exam, followed by the Idiots' exam
>> and then the Retards' exam.
>>
>> Then, and only then, do you take out a licence
>>
>> There is no compulsion to take out a licence under the gangrenous
>> degeneration that is the M3/CB Fools' Licence scheme.
>>
>> Licences come at the end of a qualification exercise and not at
>> the beginning.
>>
>> Not only do you display your ignorance about the difference between
>> an exam and a licence, you continue to utter gratuitous rude remarks
>> thus adding weight to the adage, "Once an M3, always an M3".
>>
>>
>>BUZZZZZZZZZZZ!! 
>
Obviously a Python fan, you've certainly picked the right room for a
argument!

"Rambo"  wrote in message 
news:2hgs6458vmv2ls4sl95ovc71sa2orius0r@4ax.com...
 >>
>>You may pass as many exams as you like, but you will not get a licence 
>>until
>>you actually apply for one, (or not). It is perfectly possible to pass all 
>>3
>>exams in quick succession and only then apply for a Full Licence, and so 
>>you
>>will have never been a foundation or intermediate licence holder.
>>
>>73
>>Jeff
>>
> On that technicallity I am happy to concede that point. However it a
> rather unlikley scenario.

I organise sessions for those wishing to do exactly what Jeff mentions.  I 
have been doing so for 3 or 4 years now and I am in the initial stages of 
planning another one.

-- 
73
Brian, G8OSN
www.g8osn.org.uk

"Rambo"  wrote in message
>>>
>>>
>>>BUZZZZZZZZZZZ!!
>>
> Obviously a Python fan, you've certainly picked the right room for a
> argument!

I'm sorry, is this the 5 minute argument or the full half hour?

-- 
73
Graham
-- ----- -.-- ... ..-

"Graham M0YSU"  wrote in message 
news:486e595b$0$1348$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere.com...
> "Rambo"  wrote in message
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>BUZZZZZZZZZZZ!!
>>>
>> Obviously a Python fan, you've certainly picked the right room for a
>> argument!
>
> I'm sorry, is this the 5 minute argument or the full half hour?
>

I wonder how long those Python quotes will live on?

Some friends of ours in the USA have daughters we weren't born until years 
after the Python phase, However, they excel in using phrases from the Python 
programmes and films.

I was never that keen on Python myself.

By the way, NSY



-- 
73
Brian, G8OSN
www.g8osn.org.uk

"Brian Reay" <see@website.invalid> wrote in message 
news:4Xsbk.9172$jB5.8751@newsfe05.ams2...
>
>
> "Graham M0YSU"  wrote in message 
> news:486e595b$0$1348$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere.com...
>> "Rambo"  wrote in message
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>BUZZZZZZZZZZZ!!
>>>>
>>> Obviously a Python fan, you've certainly picked the right room for a
>>> argument!
>>
>> I'm sorry, is this the 5 minute argument or the full half hour?
>>
>
> I wonder how long those Python quotes will live on?
>
> Some friends of ours in the USA have daughters we weren't born until years 
> after the Python phase, However, they excel in using phrases from the 
> Python programmes and films.
>
> I was never that keen on Python myself.
>
> By the way, NSY

Monty Python is engraved on many peoples memory as it was incredibly funny 
humour for it's day. I must admit to not being a 'fan' as such but remember 
many memorable quotes...

..All I did was say to my wife, "That piece of halibut was good enough for 
Jehovah!" ..
..Stwike him, Centuwion. Stwike him vewy wuffly!..

Now I know I am going to regret this but what is a NSY?

-- 
73
Graham
-- ----- -.-- ... ..-

"Graham M0YSU"  wrote in message 
news:486e5fcc$0$1349$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere.com...
 >
> Monty Python is engraved on many peoples memory as it was incredibly funny 
> humour for it's day. I must admit to not being a 'fan' as such but 
> remember many memorable quotes...

When was it current  on the TV? I think when I was at Grammar school, so 
late 60s to mid 70s. Some sketches just seemed silly to me.

I preferred "The Goodies" and, these days, my preferred humour is programmes 
like The News Quiz, Just a  Minute etc.  Must be a sign of getting old.

Senior Management went to see "Spam Alot" and enjoyed it, although she isn't 
a Python fan. Being the member of the audience they drag up onto the stage 
for the finale wasn't something she expected!


> Now I know I am going to regret this but what is a NSY?

Wait and see ;-)

By the way, NSY.


-- 
73
Brian, G8OSN
www.g8osn.org.uk

"Brian Reay" <see@website.invalid> wrote in message 
news:cltbk.9181$jB5.1687@newsfe05.ams2...

> "Graham M0YSU"  wrote in message 
> news:486e5fcc$0$1349$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere.com...
> >
>> Monty Python is engraved on many peoples memory as it was incredibly 
>> funny humour for it's day. I must admit to not being a 'fan' as such but 
>> remember many memorable quotes...
>
> When was it current  on the TV? I think when I was at Grammar school, so 
> late 60s to mid 70s. Some sketches just seemed silly to me.

That was the whole point Brian.. (rolls eyes).  5th October 1969 was when it 
began on TV. A total of 45 episodes were made over four series up until 
1974. After that came the films. More info can be found at Wikipedia.com

> I preferred "The Goodies" and, these days, my preferred humour is 
> programmes like The News Quiz, Just a  Minute etc.  Must be a sign of 
> getting old.

"It's iron oar..... iron oar?.... iron oar something else"

> Senior Management went to see "Spam Alot" and enjoyed it, although she 
> isn't a Python fan. Being the member of the audience they drag up onto the 
> stage for the finale wasn't something she expected!
>
>
>> Now I know I am going to regret this but what is a NSY?
>
> Wait and see ;-)
>
> By the way, NSY.

I am waiting in anticipation... I hope it's going to be good...

-- 
73
Graham
-- ----- -.-- ... ..-

"Graham M0YSU"  wrote in message 
news:486e5fcc$0$1349$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere.com...
> Now I know I am going to regret this but what is a NSY?

It's the latest ruse of the drama queen, M3OSN, to seek to be
the centre of attention.

Watch out for the lashings-out of an infantile temper tantrum when
he just makes a fool of himself, _YET AGAIN_ !!

"Graham M0YSU"  wrote in message 
news:486e655a$0$1346$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere.com...
> "Brian Reay" <see@website.invalid> wrote in message 
> news:cltbk.9181$jB5.1687@newsfe05.ams2...
>> "Graham M0YSU"  wrote in message 
>> news:486e5fcc$0$1349$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere.com...
>> >
>>> Monty Python is engraved on many peoples memory as it was incredibly 
>>> funny humour for it's day. I must admit to not being a 'fan' as such but 
>>> remember many memorable quotes...
>>
>> When was it current  on the TV? I think when I was at Grammar school, so 
>> late 60s to mid 70s. Some sketches just seemed silly to me.
>
> That was the whole point Brian.. (rolls eyes).  5th October 1969 was when 
> it began on TV. A total of 45 episodes were made over four series up until 
> 1974. After that came the films. More info can be found at Wikipedia.com
>
>
I remember watching the first episode, i was a 12 year old expecting to see
an air show of some kind, it was the only topic of conversation at school 
the next day

Steve Terry

"Steve Terry"  wrote in message 
news:g4lsvu$md6$1@news.albasani.net...
>
> "Graham M0YSU"  wrote in message 
> news:486e655a$0$1346$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere.com...
>> "Brian Reay" <see@website.invalid> wrote in message 
>> news:cltbk.9181$jB5.1687@newsfe05.ams2...
>>> "Graham M0YSU"  wrote in message 
>>> news:486e5fcc$0$1349$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere.com...
>>> >
>>>> Monty Python is engraved on many peoples memory as it was incredibly 
>>>> funny humour for it's day. I must admit to not being a 'fan' as such 
>>>> but remember many memorable quotes...
>>>
>>> When was it current  on the TV? I think when I was at Grammar school, so 
>>> late 60s to mid 70s. Some sketches just seemed silly to me.
>>
>> That was the whole point Brian.. (rolls eyes).  5th October 1969 was when 
>> it began on TV. A total of 45 episodes were made over four series up 
>> until 1974. After that came the films. More info can be found at 
>> Wikipedia.com
>>
>>
> I remember watching the first episode, i was a 12 year old expecting to 
> see
> an air show of some kind, it was the only topic of conversation at school 
> the next day
>
> Steve Terry

I was only 7 and had no interest at the time. I see where you were coming 
from with the air show though...

-- 
73
Graham
-- ----- -.-- ... ..-
. o 0 (watching out for the big foot...)

Brian Rea wrote:
> "Rambo"  wrote in message 
> news:2hgs6458vmv2ls4sl95ovc71sa2orius0r@4ax.com...
>  >>
>>> You may pass as many exams as you like, but you will not get a licence 
>>> until
>>> you actually apply for one, (or not). It is perfectly possible to pass all 
>>> 3
>>> exams in quick succession and only then apply for a Full Licence, and so 
>>> you
>>> will have never been a foundation or intermediate licence holder.
>>>
>>> 73
>>> Jeff
>>>
>> On that technicality I am happy to concede that point. However it a
>> rather unlikely scenario.
> 
> I organize sessions for those wishing to do exactly what Jeff mentions.  I 
> have been doing so for 3 or 4 years now and I am in the initial stages of 
> planning another one.
> 

Why not have just one paper that includes all the relevant questions? 
About half of the people who did the old RAE under the old C&G scheme 
already had the education and experience as a shortwave listener and 
constructor to pass.

Steve H
(Numpty CB owner posting with a valid email)

> I was never that keen on Python myself.
>

we could tell ......

> When was it current  on the TV? I think when I was at Grammar school, so
> late 60s to mid 70s. Some sketches just seemed silly to me.
>

Python is why I got into Dangerous Buildings .....

The modern DIGITAL world is rubbish ........ wrote:
>> When was it current  on the TV? I think when I was at Grammar school, so
>> late 60s to mid 70s. Some sketches just seemed silly to me.
>>
> 
> Python is why I got into Dangerous Buildings .....
> 
> 
> 
Go on I'm intrigued if no one else is Jim! What's the link with Monty 
Python and dangerous buildings?

"Len GM0ONX"  wrote in message 
news:g4m5em$88c$1@news.albasani.net...
> The modern DIGITAL world is rubbish ........ wrote:
>>> When was it current  on the TV? I think when I was at Grammar school, so
>>> late 60s to mid 70s. Some sketches just seemed silly to me.
>>
>> Python is why I got into Dangerous Buildings .....
>>
> Go on I'm intrigued if no one else is Jim! What's the link with Monty 
> Python and dangerous buildings?
>
>
It's one of the lesser known python sketches

Steve Terry

Graham M0YSU wrote:

> 
> That was the whole point Brian.. (rolls eyes).  5th October 1969
> was when it began on TV. A total of 45 episodes were made over
> four series up until 1974. After that came the films. More info
> can be found at Wikipedia.com
> 

1969, Falmouth, Wednesday nights. Take the washing to the
launderette next to the Killigrew Arms, stoke up the washer then
next door for 8.00pm (IIRC), settle down with a pint and by the time
Python was over it was time to put the washing in the drier and then
back for another pint. Doing the washing was never sweeter!


Happy, hippy, days!


Charlie.

-- 
M0WYM
www.radiowymsey.org

Wymsey - Ten years Old!
www.wymsey.co.uk

>> Python is why I got into Dangerous Buildings .....
>>
>>
>>
> Go on I'm intrigued if no one else is Jim! What's the link with Monty 
> Python and dangerous buildings?

you are with Brian on this one then ........

"Steve Terry"  wrote in message 
news:g4mcdj$lcb$1@news.albasani.net...
>
> "Len GM0ONX"  wrote in message 
> news:g4m5em$88c$1@news.albasani.net...
>> The modern DIGITAL world is rubbish ........ wrote:
>>>> When was it current  on the TV? I think when I was at Grammar school, 
>>>> so
>>>> late 60s to mid 70s. Some sketches just seemed silly to me.
>>>
>>> Python is why I got into Dangerous Buildings .....
>>>
>> Go on I'm intrigued if no one else is Jim! What's the link with Monty 
>> Python and dangerous buildings?
>>
>>
> It's one of the lesser known python sketches
>
> Steve Terry
>
I found it quite funny and based my lives work on it...but then again my 
house name is "B ARK"  .................