I have stated my opinion that someone, although holding an Amateur
(Sound) Licence A (obtained by him via the easiest route available at
the time and taking well over a decade to do so), who sold a standard
design of transceiver because 'vital tune-up pages missing from
manual' and who had no idea what the 'preselector' control was for,
was incompetent.

Note that I am not obliged to produce evidence for the opinions that I
hold.

I have stated my opinion and there is no room for further
opinionating.


-- 

from
Aero Spike

"Spike" <Aero.Spike@S&T.invalid> wrote in message 
news:n6v964pjo42m983osthe1ubnrj2rnvh94q@4ax.com...
> I have stated my opinion that someone, although holding an Amateur
> (Sound) Licence A (obtained by him via the easiest route available at
> the time and taking well over a decade to do so), who sold a standard
> design of transceiver because 'vital tune-up pages missing from
> manual' and who had no idea what the 'preselector' control was for,
> was incompetent.

Someone knowing that there were caveats on the operation of
equipment and exercising caution in respect of those caveats
so as not to damage a museum-piece that was in pristine
condition was incompetent?

Hardly, it would have been the fool who rushed-in-where-angels
feared-to-tread who would have displayed incompetence.

But the truth has never bothered you, Mrs.Nugatory in your
desperation to want to cause insult arising from your destructive
and negative attitude towards your fellow man.

The truth of the matter is that I did not sell it because of the
pages missing from the manual. I sold it, amongst other
bulky items because of the space it took up. You have
been informed of this before, but it is an inconvenient
truth for you so you ignore it in your headlong rush to
want to cause insult.

Spike wrote:

>
>I have stated my opinion that someone, although holding an Amateur
>(Sound) Licence A (obtained by him via the easiest route available at
>the time and taking well over a decade to do so), who sold a standard
>design of transceiver because 'vital tune-up pages missing from
>manual' and who had no idea what the 'preselector' control was for,
>was incompetent.
>
>Note that I am not obliged to produce evidence for the opinions that I
>hold.
>
>I have stated my opinion and there is no room for further
>opinionating.

Bad form etc.

Well, quoting his words back at him shut him up.

Now he's taking it out on others.

I suggest they do the same as I did.

-- 

from
Aero Spike

"Spike" <Aero.Spike@S&T.invalid> wrote in message 
news:ilga64h19thdrr5k0gcjqq65qis3qikbio@4ax.com...
>
> Spike wrote:
>
>>
>>I have stated my opinion that someone, although holding an Amateur
>>(Sound) Licence A (obtained by him via the easiest route available at
>>the time and taking well over a decade to do so), who sold a standard
>>design of transceiver because 'vital tune-up pages missing from
>>manual' and who had no idea what the 'preselector' control was for,
>>was incompetent.
>>
>>Note that I am not obliged to produce evidence for the opinions that I
>>hold.
>>
>>I have stated my opinion and there is no room for further
>>opinionating.
>
> Bad form etc.
>
> Well, quoting his words back at him shut him up.
>
> Now he's taking it out on others.
>
> I suggest they do the same as I did.

That is his MO.

"Spike" <Aero.Spike@S&T.invalid> wrote in message 
news:ilga64h19thdrr5k0gcjqq65qis3qikbio@4ax.com...
> Spike wrote:
>>I have stated my opinion that someone, although holding an Amateur
>>(Sound) Licence A (obtained by him via the easiest route available at
>>the time and taking well over a decade to do so), who sold a standard
>>design of transceiver because 'vital tune-up pages missing from
>>manual' and who had no idea what the 'preselector' control was for,
>>was incompetent.
>
> Well, quoting his words back at him shut him up.

Hardly.

The second post in this thread challenges you on what you said above.

So deeply ingrained is your need to want to cause insult that
you are now blind to anything that does not fit in with your
motivation to be negative and destructive towards your fellow
man.

But the truth has never been anything that has bothered you in
the past, has it, Mrs.Nugatory?

"Me"  wrote in message 
news:g43hcf$v30$1@registered.motzarella.org...
> "Spike" <Aero.Spike@S&T.invalid> wrote in message 
> news:ilga64h19thdrr5k0gcjqq65qis3qikbio@4ax.com...
>> Spike wrote:
>>>I have stated my opinion that someone, although holding an Amateur
>>>(Sound) Licence A (obtained by him via the easiest route available at
>>>the time and taking well over a decade to do so), who sold a standard
>>>design of transceiver because 'vital tune-up pages missing from
>>>manual' and who had no idea what the 'preselector' control was for,
>>>was incompetent.
>>>Note that I am not obliged to produce evidence for the opinions that I
>>>hold.
>>>I have stated my opinion and there is no room for further
>>>opinionating.
>> Bad form etc.
>> Well, quoting his words back at him shut him up.
>> Now he's taking it out on others.
>> I suggest they do the same as I did.
> That is his MO.

Now that you have been unmasked in your attempts to dissemble
yourself, Mrs.Nugatory, you appear to be sicker in the mind that
your concerted output of gratuitously insulting remarks could ever
suggest, for there you are, replying to yourself under another
pseudonym.

Is your case so weak that you need to invent support for yourself?

So it would seem.

I pity you, Mrs.Nugatory.

"The Chippenham Buffoon (CB)"  wrote in message 
news:g44t2i$kaa$1@news.albasani.net...
>
> Now that you have been unmasked in your attempts to dissemble
> yourself, Mrs.Nugatory, you appear to be sicker in the mind that
> your concerted output of gratuitously insulting remarks could ever
> suggest, for there you are, replying to yourself under another
> pseudonym.
>
> Is your case so weak that you need to invent support for yourself?
>
> So it would seem.
>
> I pity you, Mrs.Nugatory.
>
>
There are plenty of instances on this NG where YOU have answered your own 
garbage without even changing sock puppets. What was this crap about 'don't 
do as I do, do as I say' again, old Bean?
-- 
;-)
.
73 de Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI - mine's a pint.
.
http://turner-smith.co.uk

Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI wrote:

>"The Chippenham Buffoon (CB)"  wrote in message 
>news:g44t2i$kaa$1@news.albasani.net...
>>
>> Now that you have been unmasked in your attempts to dissemble
>> yourself, Mrs.Nugatory, you appear to be sicker in the mind that
>> your concerted output of gratuitously insulting remarks could ever
>> suggest, for there you are, replying to yourself under another
>> pseudonym.
>>
>> Is your case so weak that you need to invent support for yourself?
>>
>> So it would seem.
>>
>> I pity you, Mrs.Nugatory.
>>
>There are plenty of instances on this NG where YOU have answered your own 
>garbage without even changing sock puppets. What was this crap about 'don't 
>do as I do, do as I say' again, old Bean?

There was the famous 'Blackgates' thread on the models.engineering
group, where the only reason he had for changing sock-puppets was to
ensure others saw his replies as they evaded reader's kill-files - a
fairly low thing to do.

There was also one chap of note (but no substance and even less
consequence) on here who changed sock-puppets over forty times in a
three-month period, in a posting history that must span hundreds of
such changes. He seems not to appreciate others doing as he does, for
some reason, if they have the temerity to do that.

Personally, I use one username at a time on here, so any other
postings that sloppy research and even sloppier thinking suggests
might be mine, aren't.

It is up to the feeble-of-thinking to justify their libel, not for me
to prove it isn't so.

Cheers - I'm off for the first beer of the evening.


-- 
from
Aero Spike
"I have stated my opinion. Note that I am not obliged to produce
 evidence for the opinions that I hold. I have stated my opinion
 and there is no room for further opinionating or opining"

"Spike" <Aero.Spike@S&T.invalid> wrote in message 
news:dbpc64dhbfmp5r2q2jt1ohgm8agn6lnarv@4ax.com...
>
> There was the famous 'Blackgates' thread on the models.engineering
> group, where the only reason he had for changing sock-puppets was to
> ensure others saw his replies as they evaded reader's kill-files - a
> fairly low thing to do.

That is simply not true, but the lack of truth in what you post has
never troubled you before in your desperation to want to cause
insult as the result of your negative and destructive attitude,
as illustrated well above.

"Spike" <Aero.Spike@S&T.invalid> wrote in message 
news:dbpc64dhbfmp5r2q2jt1ohgm8agn6lnarv@4ax.com...
>
> Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI wrote:
>
>>"The Chippenham Buffoon (CB)"  wrote in message
>>news:g44t2i$kaa$1@news.albasani.net...
>>>
>>> Now that you have been unmasked in your attempts to dissemble
>>> yourself, Mrs.Nugatory, you appear to be sicker in the mind that
>>> your concerted output of gratuitously insulting remarks could ever
>>> suggest, for there you are, replying to yourself under another
>>> pseudonym.
>>>
>>> Is your case so weak that you need to invent support for yourself?
>>>
>>> So it would seem.
>>>
>>> I pity you, Mrs.Nugatory.
>>>
>>There are plenty of instances on this NG where YOU have answered your own
>>garbage without even changing sock puppets. What was this crap about 
>>'don't
>>do as I do, do as I say' again, old Bean?
>
> There was the famous 'Blackgates' thread on the models.engineering
> group, where the only reason he had for changing sock-puppets was to
> ensure others saw his replies as they evaded reader's kill-files - a
> fairly low thing to do.
>
> There was also one chap of note (but no substance and even less
> consequence) on here who changed sock-puppets over forty times in a
> three-month period, in a posting history that must span hundreds of
> such changes. He seems not to appreciate others doing as he does, for
> some reason, if they have the temerity to do that.
>
> Personally, I use one username at a time on here, so any other
> postings that sloppy research and even sloppier thinking suggests
> might be mine, aren't.
>
> It is up to the feeble-of-thinking to justify their libel, not for me
> to prove it isn't so.
>
> Cheers - I'm off for the first beer of the evening.
>
Have one for me, or several if you like.
-- 
;-)
.
73 de Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI - mine's a pint.
.
http://turner-smith.co.uk

"Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI"  wrote in message 
news:bHv9k.131210>>
>> Cheers - I'm off for the first beer of the evening.
>>
> Have one for me, or several if you like.
> -- 
> ;-)
> .
> 73 de Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI - mine's a pint.

Remember, it is not your friend that buys you strong drink, it is the person 
who makes sure you get home safely :o)

-- 
73
Graham
-- ----- -.-- ... ..-