Now it is Cowardy Custard who is using every chance
to sneer at me.

What's made him such an anally-retentive petty-minded
poison pen all of a sudden?

On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 17:51:58 +0100, "12 WPM Class A"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:

>Now it is Cowardy Custard who is using every chance
>to sneer at me.
>
Hardly. I responded to a couple of the numerous postings you made
today. I've told you a million times, "Don't exaggerate!"

>What's made him such an anally-retentive petty-minded
>poison pen all of a sudden?

It behoves me to follow the example set by the self-appointed
'maintainer of standards' and to correct his errors in the hope of
making him a better person.

>

Custos Custodum wrote:

>On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 17:51:58 +0100, "12 WPM Class A"
><invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>>Now it is Cowardy Custard who is using every chance
>>to sneer at me.
>>
>Hardly. I responded to a couple of the numerous postings you made
>today. I've told you a million times, "Don't exaggerate!"
>
>>What's made him such an anally-retentive petty-minded
>>poison pen all of a sudden?
>
>It behoves me to follow the example set by the self-appointed
>'maintainer of standards' and to correct his errors in the hope of
>making him a better person.

AOL on that.


-- 

from
Aero Spike

"Custos Custodum"  wrote in message 
news:38o7645gccngm0ekg5r66hqo8kcue1m4dv@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 17:51:58 +0100, "12 WPM Class A"
> <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>Now it is Cowardy Custard who is using every chance
>>to sneer at me.
> Hardly. I responded to a couple of the numerous postings you made
> today. I've told you a million times, "Don't exaggerate!"

I was referring to your record over the past few days.

Interesting that you respond to the "Cowardy" name.

On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 09:26:09 +0100, "12 WPM Class A"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:

>"Custos Custodum"  wrote in message 
>news:38o7645gccngm0ekg5r66hqo8kcue1m4dv@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 17:51:58 +0100, "12 WPM Class A"
>> <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>Now it is Cowardy Custard who is using every chance
>>>to sneer at me.
>> Hardly. I responded to a couple of the numerous postings you made
>> today. I've told you a million times, "Don't exaggerate!"
>
>I was referring to your record over the past few days.
>
A drop in the ocean compared to the number of postings you have made
over the same period that I could have responded to, had I been so
inclined. That's hardly "using every chance".

>Interesting that you respond to the "Cowardy" name.
>
Not really. I correctly identified it as another instance of your
juvenile, playground name-calling and exercised my right to reply.

"Custos Custodum"  wrote in message 
news:fhh964tj0da831j350nsk9rq5p1iutpu9b@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 09:26:09 +0100, "12 WPM Class A"
> <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>"Custos Custodum"  wrote in message
>>news:38o7645gccngm0ekg5r66hqo8kcue1m4dv@4ax.com...
>>> On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 17:51:58 +0100, "12 WPM Class A"
>>> <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>Now it is Cowardy Custard who is using every chance
>>>>to sneer at me.
>>> Hardly. I responded to a couple of the numerous postings you made
>>> today. I've told you a million times, "Don't exaggerate!"
>>I was referring to your record over the past few days.
> A drop in the ocean compared to the number of postings you have made
> over the same period that I could have responded to, had I been so
> inclined. That's hardly "using every chance".

So you admit to having been pursuing an obsession against me over the
past few days.

Just who do you think you are? Mrs.Nugatory?

On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:48:13 +0100, "12 WPM Class A"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:

>"Custos Custodum"  wrote in message 
>news:fhh964tj0da831j350nsk9rq5p1iutpu9b@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 09:26:09 +0100, "12 WPM Class A"
>> <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>"Custos Custodum"  wrote in message
>>>news:38o7645gccngm0ekg5r66hqo8kcue1m4dv@4ax.com...
>>>> On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 17:51:58 +0100, "12 WPM Class A"
>>>> <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>Now it is Cowardy Custard who is using every chance
>>>>>to sneer at me.
>>>> Hardly. I responded to a couple of the numerous postings you made
>>>> today. I've told you a million times, "Don't exaggerate!"
>>>I was referring to your record over the past few days.
>> A drop in the ocean compared to the number of postings you have made
>> over the same period that I could have responded to, had I been so
>> inclined. That's hardly "using every chance".
>
>So you admit to having been pursuing an obsession against me over the
>past few days.
>
How on earth do you arrive at that conclusion (apart from
egocentricity)? I post on a whim. Always have done. Your posting
volume in recent days (idle hands?) just makes it all the more likely
that you will post something that I feel inclined to challenge or
comment upon.

>Just who do you think you are? Mrs.Nugatory?
>
No. I'm a real person, not a figment of your febrile imagination.

"Custos Custodum"  wrote in message
news:9up96492es2vbhncbvuvrt21da2r3qv50d@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:48:13 +0100, "12 WPM Class A"
> <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>So you admit to having been pursuing an obsession against me over the
>>past few days.
>>
> .....  egocentricity ..... idle hands? ..... a figment of your febrile
> imagination.

Your use of usenet as a vehicle for disseminating puerile remarks is
evidence
of your fixation.

Just like G6KHP you need to take a step backwards and review your recent
behaviour for it does not show you in a good light.

12 WPM Class A wrote:

> "Custos Custodum"  wrote in message
> news:9up96492es2vbhncbvuvrt21da2r3qv50d@4ax.com...
> 
>>On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:48:13 +0100, "12 WPM Class A"
>><invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>So you admit to having been pursuing an obsession against me over the
>>>past few days.
>>>
>>
>>.....  egocentricity ..... idle hands? ..... a figment of your febrile
>>imagination.
> 
> 
> Your use of usenet as a vehicle for disseminating puerile remarks is
> evidence
> of your fixation.

Oh do piss off and die

"Dave"  wrote in message
news:upGdnTTtHqWE__jVRVnyvAA@bt.com...
> Oh do piss off and die

Your concerted campaign of joining threads only to interject
rather silly and childish abuse has the effect of making you
to appear to be most foolish, OM.

On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 22:56:41 +0100, Dave 
wrote:

>Oh do piss off and die

The foul-mouthed CBer reveals himself again and again.

73 de G3NYY

-- 
Walt Davidson                               Email: g3nyy @despammed.com

On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:48:11 +0100, "12 WPM Class A"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:

>"Custos Custodum"  wrote in message
>news:9up96492es2vbhncbvuvrt21da2r3qv50d@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:48:13 +0100, "12 WPM Class A"
>> <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>So you admit to having been pursuing an obsession against me over the
>>>past few days.
>>>
>> .....  egocentricity ..... idle hands? ..... a figment of your febrile
>> imagination.
>
>Your use of usenet as a vehicle for disseminating puerile remarks is
>evidence
>of your fixation.

You might care to believe that. In fact, you probably need to believe
that in order to reinforce your sense of persecution, but that doesn't
make it true, no matter how often you repeat it. Posting here amounts
to no more than a distraction for me, a displacement activity when
work gets boring. As for fixations: I'm not the one who has originated
almost half of the new threads in this n.g. in recent days.

>
>Just like G6KHP you need to take a step backwards and review your recent
>behaviour for it does not show you in a good light.
>
Perhaps you need to follow your own advice in this regard...

"Custos Custodum"  wrote in message 
news:2o5c641v62hfab3n0s6pjd3eb2pf7uorv5@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:48:11 +0100, "12 WPM Class A"
> <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>"Custos Custodum"  wrote in message
>>news:9up96492es2vbhncbvuvrt21da2r3qv50d@4ax.com...
>>> On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:48:13 +0100, "12 WPM Class A"
>>> <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>So you admit to having been pursuing an obsession against me over the
>>>>past few days.
>>> .....  egocentricity ..... idle hands? ..... a figment of your febrile
>>> imagination.
>>Your use of usenet as a vehicle for disseminating puerile remarks is
>>evidence
>>of your fixation.

And to follow, once more in the tradition of out-of-the-blue
gratuitous remarks ...

> ... to reinforce your sense of persecution, ...  As for fixations: I'm not
> the one who has originated  almost half of the new threads in this n.g. in 
> recent days.

Temper, temper, OM!

"12 WPM Class A" <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote in message 
news:g455uh$5rr$1@news.albasani.net...
> "Custos Custodum"  wrote in message 
> news:2o5c641v62hfab3n0s6pjd3eb2pf7uorv5@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:48:11 +0100, "12 WPM Class A"
>> <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>"Custos Custodum"  wrote in message
>>>news:9up96492es2vbhncbvuvrt21da2r3qv50d@4ax.com...
>>>> On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:48:13 +0100, "12 WPM Class A"
>>>> <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>So you admit to having been pursuing an obsession against me over the
>>>>>past few days.
>>>> .....  egocentricity ..... idle hands? ..... a figment of your febrile
>>>> imagination.
>>>Your use of usenet as a vehicle for disseminating puerile remarks is
>>>evidence
>>>of your fixation.
>
> And to follow, once more in the tradition of out-of-the-blue
> gratuitous remarks ...
>
>> ... to reinforce your sense of persecution, ...  As for fixations: I'm 
>> not
>> the one who has originated  almost half of the new threads in this n.g. 
>> in recent days.
>
> Temper, temper, OM!

And to follow in another thread, ...

> So much for 'gentlemanly traditions'

You're going to be hard pressed to claim that you're not obsessed with
firing a whole tirade of gratuitous remarks in my direction, OM.

What's got at you, the realisation that you never passed the 12 WPM
Morse test, perhaps?

On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 12:05:50 +0100, "12 WPM Class A"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:

>"Custos Custodum"  wrote in message 
>news:2o5c641v62hfab3n0s6pjd3eb2pf7uorv5@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:48:11 +0100, "12 WPM Class A"
>> <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>"Custos Custodum"  wrote in message
>>>news:9up96492es2vbhncbvuvrt21da2r3qv50d@4ax.com...
>>>> On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:48:13 +0100, "12 WPM Class A"
>>>> <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>So you admit to having been pursuing an obsession against me over the
>>>>>past few days.
>>>> .....  egocentricity ..... idle hands? ..... a figment of your febrile
>>>> imagination.
>>>Your use of usenet as a vehicle for disseminating puerile remarks is
>>>evidence
>>>of your fixation.
>
>And to follow, once more in the tradition of out-of-the-blue
>gratuitous remarks ...
>
Nothing out-of-the-blue about it. I was exercising my right to reply.

>> ... to reinforce your sense of persecution, ...  As for fixations: I'm not
>> the one who has originated  almost half of the new threads in this n.g. in 
>> recent days.
>
>Temper, temper, OM!
>
Temper? Me? I think you'll find that I'm not the one with well
documented anger management problems.

"Custos Custodum"  wrote in message 
news:k51d64d1hcu29qsdjvtlqmokk8rp5hivr5@4ax.com...
>>"Custos Custodum"  wrote in message
>>news:2o5c641v62hfab3n0s6pjd3eb2pf7uorv5@4ax.com...
>>>>"Custos Custodum"  wrote in message
>>>>news:9up96492es2vbhncbvuvrt21da2r3qv50d@4ax.com...
>>>> .....  egocentricity ..... idle hands? ..... a figment of your febrile
>>>> imagination.
>>> ... to reinforce your sense of persecution, ...  As for fixations: I'm 
>>> not
>>> the one who has originated  almost half of the new threads in this n.g. 
>>> in
> Temper? Me? I think you'll find that I'm not the one with well
> documented anger management problems.

On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 12:09:22 +0100, "12 WPM Class A"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:

>"12 WPM Class A" <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote in message 
>news:g455uh$5rr$1@news.albasani.net...
>> "Custos Custodum"  wrote in message 
>> news:2o5c641v62hfab3n0s6pjd3eb2pf7uorv5@4ax.com...
>>> On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:48:11 +0100, "12 WPM Class A"
>>> <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>"Custos Custodum"  wrote in message
>>>>news:9up96492es2vbhncbvuvrt21da2r3qv50d@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:48:13 +0100, "12 WPM Class A"
>>>>> <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>So you admit to having been pursuing an obsession against me over the
>>>>>>past few days.
>>>>> .....  egocentricity ..... idle hands? ..... a figment of your febrile
>>>>> imagination.
>>>>Your use of usenet as a vehicle for disseminating puerile remarks is
>>>>evidence
>>>>of your fixation.
>>
>> And to follow, once more in the tradition of out-of-the-blue
>> gratuitous remarks ...
>>
>>> ... to reinforce your sense of persecution, ...  As for fixations: I'm 
>>> not
>>> the one who has originated  almost half of the new threads in this n.g. 
>>> in recent days.
>>
>> Temper, temper, OM!
>
>And to follow in another thread, ...
>
Translation: "I'm moving this somewhere else, where the person I
originally insulted might not see it."

>> So much for 'gentlemanly traditions'
>
>You're going to be hard pressed to claim that you're not obsessed with
>firing a whole tirade of gratuitous remarks in my direction, OM.
>
So you would have us believe that your unprovoked and completely
unwarranted remark was not 'ungentlemanly' and was not therefore
deserving of criticism? (Not to mention the delicious irony of seeing
a monoglot anglophone chastising an apparent foreigner about her
'grasp of English'). Excuse me while I open a window - there's a foul
stench of hypocrisy in here. Besides, posting responses in two of the
20+, mostly contumelious (feel free to look it up), threads you have
originated in recent days hardly amounts to an obsession. Simple
arithmetic will show anyone who cares where the real obsession lies. 

>What's got at you, the realisation that you never passed the 12 WPM
>Morse test, perhaps?
>
Oh dear! Is that really the best you can manage? Whatever next?
Calling me an M3/CB'er? Perhaps you should stick your 'Right to
Reply', together with your CV (Certificate of Victimhood) and coloured
crayons, where the sun don't shine until such time as you can come up
with something a bit more convincing? (But I know you absolutely
*must* have the last word.)

"Custos Custodum"  wrote in message 
news:ic1d64prtkoomg15fl0vmrhu36l9mgigia@4ax.com...
> Translation: "I'm moving this somewhere else, where the person I
> originally insulted might not see it."
> So you would have us believe that your unprovoked and completely
> unwarranted remark was not 'ungentlemanly' and was not therefore
> deserving of criticism? (Not to mention the delicious irony of seeing
> a monoglot anglophone chastising an apparent foreigner about her
> 'grasp of English'). Excuse me while I open a window - there's a foul
> stench of hypocrisy in here. Besides, posting responses in two of the
> 20+, mostly contumelious (feel free to look it up), threads you have
> originated in recent days hardly amounts to an obsession. Simple
> arithmetic will show anyone who cares where the real obsession lies.
> Oh dear! Is that really the best you can manage? Whatever next?
> Calling me an M3/CB'er? Perhaps you should stick your 'Right to
> Reply', together with your CV (Certificate of Victimhood) and coloured
> crayons, where the sun don't shine until such time as you can come up
> with something a bit more convincing? (But I know you absolutely
> *must* have the last word.)

You are mrs.Nugatory AICMFP.

On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 21:53:43 +0100, "12 WPM Class A"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:

>
>"Custos Custodum"  wrote in message 
>news:ic1d64prtkoomg15fl0vmrhu36l9mgigia@4ax.com...
>> Translation: "I'm moving this somewhere else, where the person I
>> originally insulted might not see it."
>> So you would have us believe that your unprovoked and completely
>> unwarranted remark was not 'ungentlemanly' and was not therefore
>> deserving of criticism? (Not to mention the delicious irony of seeing
>> a monoglot anglophone chastising an apparent foreigner about her
>> 'grasp of English'). Excuse me while I open a window - there's a foul
>> stench of hypocrisy in here. Besides, posting responses in two of the
>> 20+, mostly contumelious (feel free to look it up), threads you have
>> originated in recent days hardly amounts to an obsession. Simple
>> arithmetic will show anyone who cares where the real obsession lies.
>> Oh dear! Is that really the best you can manage? Whatever next?
>> Calling me an M3/CB'er? Perhaps you should stick your 'Right to
>> Reply', together with your CV (Certificate of Victimhood) and coloured
>> crayons, where the sun don't shine until such time as you can come up
>> with something a bit more convincing? (But I know you absolutely
>> *must* have the last word.)
>
>You are mrs.Nugatory AICMFP.
>
I take that as a 'nolo contendere'.

Guilty as charged!

"Custos Custodum"  wrote in message 
news:n9ed64p48pg2hhb0u9ahn7rs6b60hrnc10@4ax.com...
>>> Translation: "I'm moving this somewhere else, where the person I
>>> originally insulted might not see it."
>>> So you would have us believe that your unprovoked and completely
>>> unwarranted remark was not 'ungentlemanly' and was not therefore
>>> deserving of criticism? (Not to mention the delicious irony of seeing
>>> a monoglot anglophone chastising an apparent foreigner about her
>>> 'grasp of English'). Excuse me while I open a window - there's a foul
>>> stench of hypocrisy in here. Besides, posting responses in two of the
>>> 20+, mostly contumelious (feel free to look it up), threads you have
>>> originated in recent days hardly amounts to an obsession. Simple
>>> arithmetic will show anyone who cares where the real obsession lies.
>>> Oh dear! Is that really the best you can manage? Whatever next?
>>> Calling me an M3/CB'er? Perhaps you should stick your 'Right to
>>> Reply', together with your CV (Certificate of Victimhood) and coloured
>>> crayons, where the sun don't shine until such time as you can come up
>>> with something a bit more convincing? (But I know you absolutely
>>> *must* have the last word.)
> I take that as a 'nolo contendere'.
> Guilty as charged!

You continue to display an obsession with abusive remarks and are
indistinguishable from Mrs.Nugatory in that respect.

Walt Davidson wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 22:56:41 +0100, Dave 
> wrote:
> 
> 
>>Oh do piss off and die
> 
> 
> The foul-mouthed CBer reveals himself again and again.

Walt, I have never been a CBer and I am normally very conservative with 
language that I do not want my g daughters to see or here. The poster I 
was replying to is the most objectionable person that I have ever met on 
the internet and deserves all the bile and battery acid that gets sent 
to him.

In my opinion, he should be sectioned to protect the public.

Dave

"Dave"  wrote in message 
news:gYKdnU_pa8zNU_rVRVnyugA@bt.com...
> Walt, I have never been a CBer and I am normally very conservative with 
> language that I do not want my g daughters to see or here. The poster I 
> was replying to is the most objectionable person that I have ever met on 
> the internet and deserves all the bile and battery acid that gets sent to 
> him.
> In my opinion, he should be sectioned to protect the public.

G6KHP, you really ought to take a step backwards and think how
your obsession with directing vindictive remarks in my direction
is making you look to be such a fool.

12 WPM Class A wrote:

> "Dave"  wrote in message 
> news:gYKdnU_pa8zNU_rVRVnyugA@bt.com...
> 
>>Walt, I have never been a CBer and I am normally very conservative with 
>>language that I do not want my g daughters to see or here. The poster I 
>>was replying to is the most objectionable person that I have ever met on 
>>the internet and deserves all the bile and battery acid that gets sent to 
>>him.
>>In my opinion, he should be sectioned to protect the public.
> 
> 
> G6KHP,

My name is not G6 KHP (note the correct way to present it.)

> you really ought to take a step backwards and think how
> your obsession with directing vindictive remarks in my direction
> is making you look to be such a fool.

I have had many more supporters in my favour. Does that not tell you 
something?

Dave. Not G6KHP.

"Dave"  wrote in message 
news:DZednbsvpYxKnfXVnZ2dnUVZ8qPinZ2d@bt.com...
>
> I have had many more supporters in my favour. Does that not tell you 
> something?

That the lunatics are taking over the asylum?