Absent from this NG for a day or so and reappears shooting
from the hip with ill-thought-out infantile remarks.

What has triggered such a childish outburst _THIS TIME_?

Perhaps it is his habituation of lashing out whenever a critique
hits home, which in this case might well be the realisation that
he, his wife, and 3-person spawnery are all parasites on the
public purse?

Perhaps it was the very amusing reference to "Rugland"?

Perhaps just green-eyed envy that he was either too lazy or
too stupid, or both, to be able to tackle and then pass (in the
25+ years that it was available to him) a 12 WPM Morse test
that otherwise-unqualified self-taught 14-year-olds were taking
in their stride?

Perhaps it is the well-deserved public opprobrium of casting
himself as the examiner for Morse Tests after his very public
25+ period of failing to tackle the 12 WPM test?

Who knows? Perhaps it is simply no more than his
everyday nastiness that results from him being a
habitual little sh*t?

"12 WPM Class A" <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote in message 
news:g3rp8a$9jt$1@news.albasani.net...
> Perhaps just green-eyed envy that he was either too lazy or
> too stupid, or both, to be able to tackle and then pass (in the
> 25+ years that it was available to him) a 12 WPM Morse test
> that otherwise-unqualified self-taught 14-year-olds were taking
> in their stride?
>
> Perhaps it is the well-deserved public opprobrium of casting
> himself as the examiner for Morse Tests after his very public
> 25+ period of failing to tackle the 12 WPM test?
>
Beanie, I've said before there is more to life than Morse code. If you get a 
life you'll find this out for yourself.
-- 
;-)

73 de Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI - mine's a pint.

http://turner-smith.co.uk

Gareth
you need to get a life me old mate.
Yes I am an M3 and would leave you standing when it comes to CW.
12 WPM was when I was 17 and only halfway through my course.
I am now 42 and just a lot faster than that.

Keep looking in your rear view mirror for that orange low loader.......
I may just have to show you how a professional operator does it

Dons hard hat and stands proud to be an M3
Gary M3GDW

On Jun 25, 12:08 am, "Gary"  wrote:
> Gareth
> you need to get a life me old mate.
> Yes I am an M3 and would leave you standing when it comes to CW.
> 12 WPM was when I was 17 and only halfway through my course.
> I am now 42 and just a lot faster than that.
>
> Keep looking in your rear view mirror for that orange low loader.......
> I may just have to show you how a professional operator does it
>
> Dons hard hat and stands proud to be an M3
> Gary M3GDW


The little twerp ran away when I offered to work him on CW, just a
coward with a big gob

looking forward to my next trip to Colerne :)

"Gary"  wrote in message 
news:fvCdnQF-oeYS4_zV4p2dnAA@bt.com...
> Gareth
> you need to get a life me old mate.
> Yes I am an M3 and would leave you standing when it comes to CW.
> 12 WPM was when I was 17 and only halfway through my course.
> I am now 42 and just a lot faster than that.
> Keep looking in your rear view mirror for that orange low loader.......
> I may just have to show you how a professional operator does it
> Dons hard hat and stands proud to be an M3
> Gary M3GDW

The infantile outburst quoted above raises a number of points ...

1. How can a grown man of 42 years be proud to hold, and have
held for a number of years now, a licence intended for 6-year-olds?
The RSCB makes much of these 6-year-olds and how they are
progressing to full licences. What's holding M3GDW back in
the kindergarten class?

2. Radio Hammery is a technical pursuit, a fact lost upon the CBer
quoted above, a pursuit in which operating comes in a very poor second
against technical competence.

3. In the gentlemanly pursuit that is Radio Hammery, it is impolite to
send CW faster than your correspondent can receive it; perhaps
the considerations of gentlemanly behaviour are lost on the vermin
who form the licentiate of the M3?CB Fools' Licence scheme, thereby
showing that such licensees are not Radio hams by any stretch of the
imagination?

4. To send any communication faster than your correspondent can receive
it makes your communication  indistinguishable from the gibbering of 
chimpanzees.
If you come across like a chimpanzee, what are we likely to deduce about 
you?

5. It is a sad and telling reflection upon the low-life that is being 
dragged from
the gutter to form the M3/CBer licentiate that they very quickly resort to
threats of violence against those with whom they do not agree. Such a 
violent
stance says more than anything else that the M3 licensee is a CBer and
not under any stretch of the imagination a Radio Ham.

"Lurcherman"  wrote in message 
news:2d35c51a-3384-4d21-a72e-22b6af881141@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> The little twerp ran away when I offered to work him on CW, just a
> coward with a big gob
> looking forward to my next trip to Colerne :)

Yet more gratuitous infantile remarks from G8GGP

On Jun 25, 9:04 am, "12 WPM Class A" <inva...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> "Lurcherman"  wrote in message
>
> news:2d35c51a-3384-4d21-a72e-22b6af881141@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
>
> > The little twerp ran away when I offered to work him on CW, just a
> > coward with a big gob
> > looking forward to my next trip to Colerne :)
>
> Yet more gratuitous infantile remarks from G8GGP



Truth hurts then gareth?., have you dusted off your key yet?, oh and
found out where to plug it in???

"12 WPM Class A" <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote in message 
news:g3su4r$j87$1@news.albasani.net...
> 1. How can a grown man of 42 years be proud to hold, and have
> held for a number of years now, a licence intended for 6-year-olds?
> The RSCB makes much of these 6-year-olds and how they are
> progressing to full licences. What's holding M3GDW back in
> the kindergarten class?

Perhaps indicative of the thick squaddie or the riff-RAF Erk who allow
themselves to be be sent on illegal invasions as cannon fodder to
satisfy someone else's political ambitions?

Those who set out on excursions to Iran and Afghanistan fully prepared
to shoot and kill their fellow man only receive their just deserts when they
themselves get killed.

Why we waste time on Inquests in this country into the deaths of these
professional murderers is beyond me. Let the inquests be held in the
countries where they died and let their bodies rot where they fell.

"Lurcherman"  wrote in message 
news:683c5776-118a-4a52-a22f-98ba53d5849d@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>On Jun 25, 9:04 am, "12 WPM Class A" <inva...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>> "Lurcherman"  wrote in message
>> news:2d35c51a-3384-4d21-a72e-22b6af881141@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
>> > The little twerp ran away when I offered to work him on CW, just a
>> > coward with a big gob
>> > looking forward to my next trip to Colerne :)
>> Yet more gratuitous infantile remarks from G8GGP
>Truth hurts then gareth?., have you dusted off your key yet?, oh and
>found out where to plug it in???

Yet more gratuitous infantile remarks from G8GGP

>
> 1. How can a grown man of 42 years be proud to hold, and have
> held for a number of years now, a licence intended for 6-year-olds?
> The RSCB makes much of these 6-year-olds and how they are
> progressing to full licences. What's holding M3GDW back in
> the kindergarten class?
>


You do not know what people are doing in their personal lives.
Many people have many reasons for not being able to progress straight away, 
I'll admit that many "can't be bothered" but there are people who find the 
study time difficult.

Personally I passed my FL in 2002 aged 37 and I was proud to be on the first 
rung of the ladder of achievement. Due to working hours etc. I was unable to 
progress until I had to stop working due to disability in 2004. This then 
gave me the time to progress through IL (2005, age 40 and proud again to be 
a step up) to the Amateur Full Radio Licence (that's what it says on my 
document) in 2006 aged, well the math should be easy enough, even for you! 
and yes I was proud again. I managed the IL and Full purely because I now 
had the time to be able to study.

I am currently trying to fit in learning Morse code (which I will be proud 
of when I can send aned receive at 12 WPM) along with experimenting with 
D-STAR and writing / publishing the club website (which is updated and added 
to weekly) while looking after myself (physically disabled), my partner 
(mental health issues) and 2 children, at least there is no job to get in 
the way!

> 2. Radio Hammery is a technical pursuit, a fact lost upon the CBer
> quoted above, a pursuit in which operating comes in a very poor second
> against technical competence.
>
Radio Hammery? A somewhat infantile term, I prefer Amateur Radio, sounds 
more adult.

See  Section 2 of your Licence document, (Terms, conditions and limitations)
1. Purpose

1(1) The Licensee shall ensure that the Radio Equipment is only used:

(a) for the purpose of self training in radio communications, including 
conducting technical investigations; and
(b) as a leisure activity and not for commercial purposes of any kind.

So INCLUDING technical, not SOLELY as your statement seems to imply, also a 
LEISURE activity.

Now some people (me included) are technically minded and technical pursuits 
may be considered as a leisure activity, but this is not the case for 
everybody.

> 3. In the gentlemanly pursuit that is Radio Hammery, it is impolite to
> send CW faster than your correspondent can receive it; perhaps
> the considerations of gentlemanly behaviour are lost on the vermin
> who form the licentiate of the M3?CB Fools' Licence scheme, thereby
> showing that such licensees are not Radio hams by any stretch of the
> imagination?
>
That infantile term again, a reflection on the writers state of mind perhaps 
or just a "pet name"? Let's give the benefit of doubt and say pet name.

I will not comment on CW itself as I am not conversant enough in CW to make 
any comments on this subject. I will agree that sending anything, including 
speaking, faster than your correspondent can understand could be construed 
as rude.

> 4. To send any communication faster than your correspondent can receive
> it makes your communication  indistinguishable from the gibbering of 
> chimpanzees.
> If you come across like a chimpanzee, what are we likely to deduce about 
> you?
>

I refer to my previous answer, although rude is quite strong enough for me.


> 5. It is a sad and telling reflection upon the low-life that is being 
> dragged from
> the gutter to form the M3/CBer licentiate that they very quickly resort to
> threats of violence against those with whom they do not agree. Such a 
> violent
> stance says more than anything else that the M3 licensee is a CBer and
> not under any stretch of the imagination a Radio Ham.
>

It would seem from your various posts that you agree only with yourself and 
deride anybody that disagrees with you.

Verbal abuse, even disguised, is a form of violence. Think about that before 
you deride people that you disagree with as you are resorting to the 
violence that you dislike so much.

I have been happy to use CB radio, indeed I still do at times, but this does 
not make me a bad "Radio Ham" as you call it.

Brian, MW0GKX, 2W0BDW, ex M(W)3BAU, ex 2F6QM.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Highfields Amateur Radio Club: http://highfields-arc.co.uk

No trees were destroyed in the sending of this contaminant-free message.
However, a significant number of electrons have been inconvenienced.

Brian MW0GKX wrote:

>>
>> 1. How can a grown man of 42 years be proud to hold, and have
>> held for a number of years now, a licence intended for 6-year-olds?
>> The RSCB makes much of these 6-year-olds and how they are
>> progressing to full licences. What's holding M3GDW back in
>> the kindergarten class?
>>
>
>You do not know what people are doing in their personal lives.
>Many people have many reasons for not being able to progress straight away, 
>I'll admit that many "can't be bothered" but there are people who find the 
>study time difficult.

Never forget that the dimwit you're in discussion with came up by the
easiest route to an HF licence that existed at the time.

That route included a seven-year period of inactivity due to personal
reasons.

IOW PKB.


-- 

from
Aero Spike

On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 00:08:53 +0100, "Gary"  wrote:

>Dons hard hat and stands proud to be an M3
>Gary M3GDW 

Hi Gary!  How u doing?
;-)

73 de G3NYY

-- 
Walt Davidson                               Email: g3nyy @despammed.com

"Spike" <Aero.Spike@S&T.invalid> wrote in message 
news:nr746458906bfnc8dofqa45ojaiagj17gv@4ax.com...
>
> Brian MW0GKX wrote:
>
>>>
>>> 1. How can a grown man of 42 years be proud to hold, and have
>>> held for a number of years now, a licence intended for 6-year-olds?
>>> The RSCB makes much of these 6-year-olds and how they are
>>> progressing to full licences. What's holding M3GDW back in
>>> the kindergarten class?
>>>
>>
>>You do not know what people are doing in their personal lives.
>>Many people have many reasons for not being able to progress straight 
>>away,
>>I'll admit that many "can't be bothered" but there are people who find the
>>study time difficult.
>
> Never forget that the dimwit you're in discussion with came up by the
> easiest route to an HF licence that existed at the time.
>
> That route included a seven-year period of inactivity due to personal
> reasons.
>


I rest my case M'lud!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Highfields Amateur Radio Club: http://highfields-arc.co.uk

No trees were destroyed in the sending of this contaminant-free message.
However, a significant number of electrons have been inconvenienced.

"Brian MW0GKX"  wrote in message 
news:OZo8k.136308$9x.47287@newsfe05.ams2...
>
> Personally I passed my FL in 2002 aged 37

If you really are 43 years old then it is high time that you
contributed to this NG in a more maturer fashion than your
history of infantile tirades demonstrates.

> ... well the math should be easy enough, even for you! Radio Hammery? A 
> somewhat infantile term
> That infantile term again, a reflection on the writers state of mind 
> perhaps It would seem from your various posts that you agree only with 
> yourself and deride anybody that disagrees with you.
> Verbal abuse, even disguised, is a form of violence. Think about that 
> before you deride people that you disagree with as you are resorting to 
> the violence that you dislike so much.

No such luck. M3BAU continues to demonstrate the truth of the adage, "Once 
an M3,
always an M3"

"Spike" <Aero.Spike@S&T.invalid> wrote in message 
news:nr746458906bfnc8dofqa45ojaiagj17gv@4ax.com...
> Brian MW0GKX wrote:
>
>>You do not know what people are doing in their personal lives.
>>Many people have many reasons for not being able to progress straight 
>>away,
>>I'll admit that many "can't be bothered" but there are people who find the
>>study time difficult.
> Never forget ... the dimwit you're in discussion with

But he's in discussion with you !

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaa !!!

"12 WPM Class A" <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote in message 
news:g3ta6h$9um$1@news.albasani.net...
> "Brian MW0GKX"  wrote in message 
> news:OZo8k.136308$9x.47287@newsfe05.ams2...
>>
> If you really are 43 years old then it is high time that you
> contributed to this NG in a more maturer fashion than your
> history of infantile tirades demonstrates.
>

See? I said you could do the math!

"Brian MW0GKX"  wrote in message 
news:b7q8k.127752$Ek2.80587@newsfe17.ams2...
> "12 WPM Class A" <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote in message 
> news:g3ta6h$9um$1@news.albasani.net...
>> "Brian MW0GKX"  wrote in message 
>> news:OZo8k.136308$9x.47287@newsfe05.ams2...
>> If you really are 43 years old then it is high time that you
>> contributed to this NG in a more mature fashion than your
>> history of infantile tirades demonstrates.
> See? I said you could do the math!

If you really are 43 years old then it is high time that you
contributed to this NG in a more mature fashion than your
history of infantile tirades demonstrates.

Gary wrote:
> Gareth
> you need to get a life me old mate.
> Yes I am an M3 and would leave you standing when it comes to CW.
> 12 WPM was when I was 17 and only halfway through my course.
> I am now 42 and just a lot faster than that.

 From QRZ:

"...You can find me mainly on the VHF/UHF bands on the nearest repeater..."

"...At home I normally use PSK31 on the HF bands..."

"...using Ham Radio Deluxe and its associated programs I normally follow 
the DX cluster and see what is about..."

"...During the night we do some DX'ing on the digital modes and VHF/UHF 
phone..."

You don't sound like much of a CW op to me.

"The One"  wrote in message 
news:_Gq8k.186465$M63.19469@newsfe13.ams2...
> Gary wrote:
>> Gareth
>> you need to get a life me old mate.
>> Yes I am an M3 and would leave you standing when it comes to CW.
>> 12 WPM was when I was 17 and only halfway through my course.
>> I am now 42 and just a lot faster than that.
> From QRZ:
> "...You can find me mainly on the VHF/UHF bands on the nearest 
> repeater..."
> "...At home I normally use PSK31 on the HF bands..."
> "...using Ham Radio Deluxe and its associated programs I normally follow 
> the DX cluster and see what is about..."
> "...During the night we do some DX'ing on the digital modes and VHF/UHF 
> phone..."
> You don't sound like much of a CW op to me.

Complete Whazzock? Au contraire!

>>> If you really are 43 years old then it is high time that you
>>> contributed to this NG in a more mature fashion than your
>>> history of infantile tirades demonstrates.
>
> If you really are 43 years old then it is high time that you
> contributed to this NG in a more mature fashion than your
> history of infantile tirades demonstrates.
>


BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ! Repetition!

>
> it is high time that you
> contributed to this NG in a more mature fashion than your
> history of infantile tirades demonstrates.
>

Hmmmm. What's YOUR excuse then?

"12 WPM Class A" <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote in message 
news:g3svcs$llq$1@news.albasani.net...

> Those who set out on excursions to Iran and Afghanistan fully prepared
> to shoot and kill their fellow man only receive their just deserts when 
> they
> themselves get killed.

Did you mean Iraq?

12 WPM Class A wrote:

> Complete Whazzock? Au contraire!

:-))

"Squadie" <no.spam.thank@you> wrote in message 
news:02d34d9f$0$29784$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...
> "12 WPM Class A" <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote in message 
> news:g3svcs$llq$1@news.albasani.net...
>> Those who set out on excursions to Iran and Afghanistan fully prepared
>> to shoot and kill their fellow man only receive their just deserts when 
>> they
>> themselves get killed.
> Did you mean Iraq?

Yes. Thanks, Clive.

No problem, didn't realise your were such a c*nt


"12 WPM Class A" <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote in message 
news:g3tvci$jg8$1@news.albasani.net...
> "Squadie" <no.spam.thank@you> wrote in message 
> news:02d34d9f$0$29784$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...
>> "12 WPM Class A" <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote in message 
>> news:g3svcs$llq$1@news.albasani.net...
>>> Those who set out on excursions to Iran and Afghanistan fully prepared
>>> to shoot and kill their fellow man only receive their just deserts when 
>>> they
>>> themselves get killed.
>> Did you mean Iraq?
>
> Yes. Thanks, Clive.
>
>
>

Spike wrote:

> That route included a seven-year period of inactivity due to personal
> reasons.
> 
> IOW PKB.

Does that mean what I think it means?


Dave

"Dave"  wrote in message 
news:tOednfVtk8FmBf_VnZ2dnUVZ8radnZ2d@bt.com...
> Spike wrote:
>> That route included a seven-year period of inactivity due to personal
>> reasons.
>> IOW PKB.
>
> Does that mean what I think it means?

Stand back and take a look at yourself OM. You're
obsessed in Mrs.Nugatory's anally retentive style.

You're making a bigger fool of yourself than ever.

Spike wrote:
> Brian MW0GKX wrote:
> 
>>> 1. How can a grown man of 42 years be proud to hold, and have
>>> held for a number of years now, a licence intended for 6-year-olds?
>>> The RSCB makes much of these 6-year-olds and how they are
>>> progressing to full licences. What's holding M3GDW back in
>>> the kindergarten class?
>>>
>> You do not know what people are doing in their personal lives.
>> Many people have many reasons for not being able to progress straight away, 
>> I'll admit that many "can't be bothered" but there are people who find the 
>> study time difficult.
> 
> Never forget that the dimwit you're in discussion with came up by the
> easiest route to an HF licence that existed at the time.
> 
> That route included a seven-year period of inactivity due to personal
> reasons.

So, you have been too busy to get a licence in the 50 years you've had 
an interest?  Or just too lazy?

12 WPM Class A wrote:

> "Dave"  wrote in message 
> news:tOednfVtk8FmBf_VnZ2dnUVZ8radnZ2d@bt.com...
> 
>>Spike wrote:
>>
>>>That route included a seven-year period of inactivity due to personal
>>>reasons.
>>>IOW PKB.
>>
>>Does that mean what I think it means?
> 
> 
> Stand back and take a look at yourself OM. You're
> obsessed in Mrs.Nugatory's anally retentive style.
> 
> You're making a bigger fool of yourself than ever.

I can't possibly do it as well as you do.

Dave

class_a wrote:

>Spike wrote:
>> Brian MW0GKX wrote:
>> 
>>>> 1. How can a grown man of 42 years be proud to hold, and have
>>>> held for a number of years now, a licence intended for 6-year-olds?
>>>> The RSCB makes much of these 6-year-olds and how they are
>>>> progressing to full licences. What's holding M3GDW back in
>>>> the kindergarten class?
>>>>
>>> You do not know what people are doing in their personal lives.
>>> Many people have many reasons for not being able to progress straight away, 
>>> I'll admit that many "can't be bothered" but there are people who find the 
>>> study time difficult.
>> 
>> Never forget that the dimwit you're in discussion with came up by the
>> easiest route to an HF licence that existed at the time.
>> 
>> That route included a seven-year period of inactivity due to personal
>> reasons.
>
>So, you have been too busy to get a licence in the 50 years you've had 
>an interest?  Or just too lazy?

Boring little fart, aren't you. Are you a dimwit too?


-- 

from
Aero Spike

Dave wrote:

>Spike wrote:
>
>> That route included a seven-year period of inactivity due to personal
>> reasons.
>> 
>> IOW PKB.
>
>Does that mean what I think it means?
>
>Dave

In other words, it's a case of the pot calling the kettle black.

HTH


-- 

from
Aero Spike

Spike wrote:
> class_a wrote:
> 
>> Spike wrote:
>>> Brian MW0GKX wrote:
>>>
>>>>> 1. How can a grown man of 42 years be proud to hold, and have
>>>>> held for a number of years now, a licence intended for 6-year-olds?
>>>>> The RSCB makes much of these 6-year-olds and how they are
>>>>> progressing to full licences. What's holding M3GDW back in
>>>>> the kindergarten class?
>>>>>
>>>> You do not know what people are doing in their personal lives.
>>>> Many people have many reasons for not being able to progress straight away, 
>>>> I'll admit that many "can't be bothered" but there are people who find the 
>>>> study time difficult.
>>> Never forget that the dimwit you're in discussion with came up by the
>>> easiest route to an HF licence that existed at the time.
>>>
>>> That route included a seven-year period of inactivity due to personal
>>> reasons.
>> So, you have been too busy to get a licence in the 50 years you've had 
>> an interest?  Or just too lazy?
> 
> Boring little fart, aren't you. Are you a dimwit too?

Awww, did you not like that question?  Did it hit a little too close to 
home?  So let's ask it again "So, you have been too busy to get a 
licence in the 50 years you've had an interest?  Or just too lazy?"

And to answer your questions, no and no, which shows just how 
ill-informed you are AGAIN.

class_a wrote:

>Spike wrote:
>> class_a wrote:
>> 
>>> Spike wrote:
>>>> Brian MW0GKX wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> 1. How can a grown man of 42 years be proud to hold, and have
>>>>>> held for a number of years now, a licence intended for 6-year-olds?
>>>>>> The RSCB makes much of these 6-year-olds and how they are
>>>>>> progressing to full licences. What's holding M3GDW back in
>>>>>> the kindergarten class?
>>>>>>
>>>>> You do not know what people are doing in their personal lives.
>>>>> Many people have many reasons for not being able to progress straight away, 
>>>>> I'll admit that many "can't be bothered" but there are people who find the 
>>>>> study time difficult.
>>>> Never forget that the dimwit you're in discussion with came up by the
>>>> easiest route to an HF licence that existed at the time.
>>>>
>>>> That route included a seven-year period of inactivity due to personal
>>>> reasons.
>>> So, you have been too busy to get a licence in the 50 years you've had 
>>> an interest?  Or just too lazy?
>> 
>> Boring little fart, aren't you. Are you a dimwit too?
>
>Awww, did you not like that question?  Did it hit a little too close to 
>home?  So let's ask it again "So, you have been too busy to get a 
>licence in the 50 years you've had an interest?  Or just too lazy?"
>
>And to answer your questions, no and no, which shows just how 
>ill-informed you are AGAIN.

If those that campaign for 'decency' and 'technical standards' can't
meet either requirement - amply illustrated on this ng - then those
that support them are necessarily fairly thick; dimwits, IOW. You fill
the bill nicely. 


-- 

from
Aero Spike

Spike wrote:
> class_a wrote:
> 
>> Spike wrote:
>>> class_a wrote:
>>>
>>>> Spike wrote:
>>>>> Brian MW0GKX wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1. How can a grown man of 42 years be proud to hold, and have
>>>>>>> held for a number of years now, a licence intended for 6-year-olds?
>>>>>>> The RSCB makes much of these 6-year-olds and how they are
>>>>>>> progressing to full licences. What's holding M3GDW back in
>>>>>>> the kindergarten class?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> You do not know what people are doing in their personal lives.
>>>>>> Many people have many reasons for not being able to progress straight away, 
>>>>>> I'll admit that many "can't be bothered" but there are people who find the 
>>>>>> study time difficult.
>>>>> Never forget that the dimwit you're in discussion with came up by the
>>>>> easiest route to an HF licence that existed at the time.
>>>>>
>>>>> That route included a seven-year period of inactivity due to personal
>>>>> reasons.
>>>> So, you have been too busy to get a licence in the 50 years you've had 
>>>> an interest?  Or just too lazy?
>>> Boring little fart, aren't you. Are you a dimwit too?
>> Awww, did you not like that question?  Did it hit a little too close to 
>> home?  So let's ask it again "So, you have been too busy to get a 
>> licence in the 50 years you've had an interest?  Or just too lazy?"
>>
>> And to answer your questions, no and no, which shows just how 
>> ill-informed you are AGAIN.
> 
> If those that campaign for 'decency' and 'technical standards' can't
> meet either requirement - amply illustrated on this ng - then those
> that support them are necessarily fairly thick; dimwits, IOW. You fill
> the bill nicely. 

And those that couldn't even pass an amateur exam after claiming 50 
years of interest, or even a FL exam in the five or so years it has been 
available fit into which category?  "fairly thick" and "dimwits" is a 
fair description.  And you fit those descriptions perfectly.

In message , class_a 
 writes
>And those that couldn't even pass an amateur exam after claiming 50 
>years of interest, or even a FL exam in the five or so years it has 
>been available fit into which category?  "fairly thick" and "dimwits" 
>is a fair description.  And you fit those descriptions perfectly.

He fits the description 'coward' too.

 > On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 14:04:36 +0000, RVMJ 99g  wrote:
 >
 > >Having been assaulted by two 'young people' in the garage at the back
 > >of my house, during which (being aware of the issues) I neither
 > >reacted or retaliated, I count myself lucky that they didn't concoct a
 > >story about the reverse being true. There were were no independent
 > >witnesses, and so their uncorroborated word as 'young people' would
 > >have been accepted without question, as is the normal practice.
 > >
 > >As they never surfaced before 10:30 on weekend mornings, I made sure
 > >that any outside work I wanted to do, such as car servicing or
 > >gardening, was done before that time, at which point I made myself
 > >scarce. Taking leave and doing jobs during the week wasn't on, as one
 > >couldn't guarantee that they wouldn't bunk off from school.
 > >
 > >As they used to congregate in the area of the garages, it meant I
 > >could never use my motorcycle without risking being accosted by them
 > >on my return, as there was no way of seeing if they were present. So
 > >for a year or two, until they discovered the world outside the area
 > >contained people of the opposite gender, I was a prisoner in my own
 > >house. Again, I count myself lucky that they only scratched my car
 > >four times, broke five radio aerials and two door mirrors, rendered
 > >the door-locks inoperative with matchsticks and slashed the tyres
 > >once. Young people need protection, did you say?

-- 
Nedlar

class_a wrote:

>Spike wrote:
>> class_a wrote:
>> 
>>> Spike wrote:
>>>> class_a wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Spike wrote:
>>>>>> Brian MW0GKX wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1. How can a grown man of 42 years be proud to hold, and have
>>>>>>>> held for a number of years now, a licence intended for 6-year-olds?
>>>>>>>> The RSCB makes much of these 6-year-olds and how they are
>>>>>>>> progressing to full licences. What's holding M3GDW back in
>>>>>>>> the kindergarten class?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You do not know what people are doing in their personal lives.
>>>>>>> Many people have many reasons for not being able to progress straight away, 
>>>>>>> I'll admit that many "can't be bothered" but there are people who find the 
>>>>>>> study time difficult.
>>>>>> Never forget that the dimwit you're in discussion with came up by the
>>>>>> easiest route to an HF licence that existed at the time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That route included a seven-year period of inactivity due to personal
>>>>>> reasons.
>>>>> So, you have been too busy to get a licence in the 50 years you've had 
>>>>> an interest?  Or just too lazy?
>>>> Boring little fart, aren't you. Are you a dimwit too?
>>> Awww, did you not like that question?  Did it hit a little too close to 
>>> home?  So let's ask it again "So, you have been too busy to get a 
>>> licence in the 50 years you've had an interest?  Or just too lazy?"
>>>
>>> And to answer your questions, no and no, which shows just how 
>>> ill-informed you are AGAIN.
>> 
>> If those that campaign for 'decency' and 'technical standards' can't
>> meet either requirement - amply illustrated on this ng - then those
>> that support them are necessarily fairly thick; dimwits, IOW. You fill
>> the bill nicely. 
>
>And those that couldn't even pass an amateur exam after claiming 50 
>years of interest, or even a FL exam in the five or so years it has been 
>available fit into which category?  "fairly thick" and "dimwits" is a 
>fair description.  And you fit those descriptions perfectly.

Try and parrot your own line of comments, and not merely repeat those
of people as unfortunate as yourself.


-- 

from
Aero Spike

Nedlar wrote:

>In message , class_a 
> writes
>>And those that couldn't even pass an amateur exam after claiming 50 
>>years of interest, or even a FL exam in the five or so years it has 
>>been available fit into which category?  "fairly thick" and "dimwits" 
>>is a fair description.  And you fit those descriptions perfectly.
>
>He fits the description 'coward' too.

Please feel free to put up your posting where you sort out a <group of
teenagers, or indeed any other group you wish to mention, from
toddlers to geriatrics> all by yourself <after you had been assaulted
by them>; so you could repost that a hundred times too.

Remind us again which branch of the Pay Corps you served in.

[note for the terminally stupid: the main danger to those serving in
the Pay Corps arose from the chance of accidentally stabbing one's
finger with a paper clip, or shutting one's finger in a filing-cabinet
drawer].


> > On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 14:04:36 +0000, RVMJ 99g  wrote:
> >
> > >Having been assaulted by two 'young people' in the garage at the back
> > >of my house, during which (being aware of the issues) I neither
> > >reacted or retaliated, I count myself lucky that they didn't concoct a
> > >story about the reverse being true. There were were no independent
> > >witnesses, and so their uncorroborated word as 'young people' would
> > >have been accepted without question, as is the normal practice.
> > >
> > >As they never surfaced before 10:30 on weekend mornings, I made sure
> > >that any outside work I wanted to do, such as car servicing or
> > >gardening, was done before that time, at which point I made myself
> > >scarce. Taking leave and doing jobs during the week wasn't on, as one
> > >couldn't guarantee that they wouldn't bunk off from school.
> > >
> > >As they used to congregate in the area of the garages, it meant I
> > >could never use my motorcycle without risking being accosted by them
> > >on my return, as there was no way of seeing if they were present. So
> > >for a year or two, until they discovered the world outside the area
> > >contained people of the opposite gender, I was a prisoner in my own
> > >house. Again, I count myself lucky that they only scratched my car
> > >four times, broke five radio aerials and two door mirrors, rendered
> > >the door-locks inoperative with matchsticks and slashed the tyres
> > >once. Young people need protection, did you say?


-- 

from
Aero Spike

can you three not just meet somewhere ...have a bounce up and find out who 
is right because you are never going to sort it out here ......

"Dave"  wrote in message 
news:0pednSdN7O6IMP_VRVnygwA@bt.com...
> 12 WPM Class A wrote:
>> Stand back and take a look at yourself OM. You're
>> obsessed in Mrs.Nugatory's anally retentive style.
>> You're making a bigger fool of yourself than ever.

> I can't possibly do it as well as you do.

Stand back and take a look at yourself OM. You're
obsessed in Mrs.Nugatory's anally retentive style.

You're making a bigger fool of yourself than ever.

"Spike" <Aero.Spike@S&T.invalid> wrote in message 
news:5ee5645kt7vlfsq2l8hdfofmbdip4if1l4@4ax.com...
>
> Boring little fart, aren't you. Are you a dimwit too?

So now you resort to infantile insults.

Your bluff has been called and you have been shown up.

Resorting to childish insults as you do above simply will not
act as a smokescreen to mask that you have not even
qualified at the level of a 6-year-old despite claiming an
interest going back 50 years.

Your regular abusing those of us who are your betters in
the context of this NG only serves to show you in a very poor light.

"Spike" <Aero.Spike@S&T.invalid> wrote in message 
news:5if664hmgk5ql7ujot0sunjogktle8brl7@4ax.com...
>
> Remind us again which branch of the Pay Corps you served in.
> [note for the terminally stupid: the main danger to those serving in
> the Pay Corps arose from the chance of accidentally stabbing one's
> finger with a paper clip, or shutting one's finger in a filing-cabinet
> drawer].

You're doing it again; making rude comments about others' military
jobs and yet you have in the past gone very quiet when challenged
about your own.

I guess that being in a reserved occupation as cleaner of the MOD
toilets doesn't shine in your public personae?

Spike wrote:
> class_a wrote:
> 
>> Spike wrote:
>>> class_a wrote:
>>>
>>>> Spike wrote:
>>>>> class_a wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Spike wrote:
>>>>>>> Brian MW0GKX wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1. How can a grown man of 42 years be proud to hold, and have
>>>>>>>>> held for a number of years now, a licence intended for 6-year-olds?
>>>>>>>>> The RSCB makes much of these 6-year-olds and how they are
>>>>>>>>> progressing to full licences. What's holding M3GDW back in
>>>>>>>>> the kindergarten class?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You do not know what people are doing in their personal lives.
>>>>>>>> Many people have many reasons for not being able to progress straight away, 
>>>>>>>> I'll admit that many "can't be bothered" but there are people who find the 
>>>>>>>> study time difficult.
>>>>>>> Never forget that the dimwit you're in discussion with came up by the
>>>>>>> easiest route to an HF licence that existed at the time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That route included a seven-year period of inactivity due to personal
>>>>>>> reasons.
>>>>>> So, you have been too busy to get a licence in the 50 years you've had 
>>>>>> an interest?  Or just too lazy?
>>>>> Boring little fart, aren't you. Are you a dimwit too?
>>>> Awww, did you not like that question?  Did it hit a little too close to 
>>>> home?  So let's ask it again "So, you have been too busy to get a 
>>>> licence in the 50 years you've had an interest?  Or just too lazy?"
>>>>
>>>> And to answer your questions, no and no, which shows just how 
>>>> ill-informed you are AGAIN.
>>> If those that campaign for 'decency' and 'technical standards' can't
>>> meet either requirement - amply illustrated on this ng - then those
>>> that support them are necessarily fairly thick; dimwits, IOW. You fill
>>> the bill nicely. 
>> And those that couldn't even pass an amateur exam after claiming 50 
>> years of interest, or even a FL exam in the five or so years it has been 
>> available fit into which category?  "fairly thick" and "dimwits" is a 
>> fair description.  And you fit those descriptions perfectly.
> 
> Try and parrot your own line of comments, and not merely repeat those
> of people as unfortunate as yourself.

So, no denial of being "fairly thick" or a "dimwit".  Very telling indeed!

In message , Spike 
<Aero.Spike@S&T.invalid> writes
>
>Please feel free to put up your posting where you sort out a <group of
>teenagers, or indeed any other group you wish to mention, from
>toddlers to geriatrics> all by yourself <after you had been assaulted
>by them>; so you could repost that a hundred times too.
>
>Remind us again which branch of the Pay Corps you served in.
>
>[note for the terminally stupid: the main danger to those serving in
>the Pay Corps arose from the chance of accidentally stabbing one's
>finger with a paper clip, or shutting one's finger in a filing-cabinet
>drawer].

What an exceedingly childish response.
Is that kind of childish attitude the reason why your local kids 
targeted you?
Incidentally, once you guess which arm of the services I actually served 
in, then you might get closer to guessing what I did. BIG HINT...it 
involved sailing on water.
You seem to know a lot about the Pay Corps...were you an ineffectual 
pen-pusher in your chosen career? Pity you didn't have the guts to have 
a military career.
-- 
Nedlar

"Jimbo ...Every Silver Lining Has A Cloud"  wrote 
in message news:6aH8k.189152$M63.176823@newsfe13.ams2...
> can you three not just meet somewhere ...have a bounce up and find out who 
> is right because you are never going to sort it out here ......
>
Indeed, it's only adding to the already high noise level on this NG

Steve Terry

"Steve Terry"  wrote in message 
news:g40b7v$b3d$1@news.albasani.net...
> "Jimbo ...Every Silver Lining Has A Cloud"  wrote 
> in message news:6aH8k.189152$M63.176823@newsfe13.ams2...
>> can you three not just meet somewhere ...have a bounce up and find out 
>> who is right because you are never going to sort it out here ......
> Indeed, it's only adding to the already high noise level on this NG

But Nedlar, Class_A and myself are fighting to restore standards
in Radio Hammery and much of our posting is in defensive
response to the _REAL_ noise level of this NG. (Otherwise,
the posting of we three is entirely apposite to this NG in
particular and to Radio  Hammery in general.)

The sources of noise are repeatedly ...

1. Anyone who is a representative of any sort of the RSCB.

2. FrankTheW*nk, G3VKI

3. The Incurable CBer, Nathan Hull G7KUJ

4. Anyone who holds, or who has ever held, a licence issued under
the gangrenous degeneration that is the M3/CB Fools' Licence scheme.

5. A couple of under-achieving ne'er-do-wells who have not even reached
the qualification level intended for 6-year-olds despite both boasting of
an interest going back decades, namely Mrs.Nugatory and The Numpty Trucker.

"Nedlar" <Nedlar@Techno.com.INVALID> wrote in message

> Incidentally, once you guess which arm of the services I actually served 
> in, then you might get closer to guessing what I did. BIG HINT...it 
> involved sailing on water.

Hello Sailor?

-- 
73
Graham
-- ----- -.-- ... ..-

"class_a"  wrote in message 
news:a8GdnYbhKvdR-P7VnZ2dnUVZ_sudnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>
>> Try and parrot your own line of comments, and not merely repeat those
>> of people as unfortunate as yourself.
>
> So, no denial of being "fairly thick" or a "dimwit".  Very telling indeed!

Talking of "dimwit" or "fairly thick"...

In the recent Interceptor Antenna thread, you demonstrated scant knowledge 
of both your licensing conditions and the law involving the possession of an 
antenna...


tox

Your Worst Nightmare wrote:
> "class_a"  wrote in message 
> news:a8GdnYbhKvdR-P7VnZ2dnUVZ_sudnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>> Try and parrot your own line of comments, and not merely repeat those
>>> of people as unfortunate as yourself.
>> So, no denial of being "fairly thick" or a "dimwit".  Very telling indeed!
> 
> Talking of "dimwit" or "fairly thick"...
> 
> In the recent Interceptor Antenna thread, you demonstrated scant knowledge 
> of both your licensing conditions and the law involving the possession of an 
> antenna...

And you avoided the question of whether you used one of these 
'Interceptors' for CB or 10m piracy, or in other words, identifying 
whether you are a numpty CBer or a 10m pirate!

> Hello Sailor?
>


bona ...........