Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
misc
announce
answers
consultants
d-i-y
environment
environment.conservation
gov.agency.csa
gov.local
gov.social-security
gov.social-work
misc
philosophy.atheism
philosophy.humanism
philosophy.misc
radio.amateur
railway
sci.astronomy
sci.med.nursing
sci.med.pharmacy
sci.misc
sci.weather
singles
telecom
telecom.broadband
telecom.mobile
telecom.voip
test
transport
transport.air
transport.buses
transport.ferry
transport.london
transport.ride-sharing
  
 
date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 06:07:05 -0700 (PDT),    group: uk.philosophy.misc        back       
Christopher Hitchens: How to be a public intellectual   
Has anyone ever described themselves as an "intellectual," or given it
as the answer to the question, "And what do you do?"� The very term
"public intellectual"� sometimes affects me like the expression
"organic food." After all, there can't be any "inorganic"�
nourishment, and it's difficult to conceive of an intellectual whose
specialisation was privacy, at least since Immanuel Kant. However, we
probably do need a term that expresses a difference between true
intellectuals and the rival callings of "opinion maker"� or "pundit,"�
especially as the last two are intimately bound up with the world of
television. (I recently rewatched the historic 40-year-old ABC News
confrontation between Gore Vidal and the late William F Buckley at the
Chicago Democratic convention. The astonishing thing was that the
network gave these two intellects a full 22 minutes to discuss matters
after the news. How far we have fallen from that standard of
commentary.) Link: http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/article_details.php?id=10163

###
date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 06:07:05 -0700 (PDT)   author:   Phi-Sci Online

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us