best part is the prologue and the chess part plus a nabokov anecdote
i'd tell you the crappier parts but im too ratarsed to go upstairs n
look it over again couldv sworn i was goona find a defense of philip
larkin but that musta been another book plus ive munched the svevo
bookie which was loony cuz all modernists are male n the only woman is
a masochist why am i thinking of geraldine chaplin in women in love
now? damn, i hafta read the quijote for class, btw amis, and i am so
not arsed im goona goo to gradesaver whats next literary correctness
by stanley fish n euphalinos n l'architect im only giving valery one
chance by the bay n then im goona spend summer drunk at the beach wit
my bitch i decided after one page i wouldnt read alasdair macyntire
and karl poopers take at the greeks cuz theys a bunch of geeks n
history n theology has nothing to do wit literature

On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 19:05:18 -0700 (PDT), sirblob2@hotmail.com posted:

>best part is the prologue and the chess part plus a nabokov anecdote
>i'd tell you the crappier parts but im too ratarsed to go upstairs n
>look it over again couldv sworn i was goona find a defense of philip
>larkin but that musta been another book plus ive munched the svevo
>bookie which was loony cuz all modernists are male n the only woman is
>a masochist why am i thinking of geraldine chaplin in women in love
>now? damn, i hafta read the quijote for class, btw amis, and i am so
>not arsed im goona goo to gradesaver whats next literary correctness
>by stanley fish n euphalinos n l'architect im only giving valery one
>chance by the bay n then im goona spend summer drunk at the beach wit
>my bitch i decided after one page i wouldnt read alasdair macyntire
>and karl poopers take at the greeks cuz theys a bunch of geeks n
>history n theology has nothing to do wit literature

Vanna, I'd like to buy some punctuation.

On 24 Apr, 03:05, sirbl...@hotmail.com wrote:
> best part is the prologue and the chess part plus a nabokov anecdote
> i'd tell you the crappier parts but im too ratarsed to go upstairs n
> look it over again couldv sworn i was goona find a defense of philip
> larkin but that musta been another book plus ive munched the svevo
> bookie which was loony cuz all modernists are male n the only woman is
> a masochist why am i thinking of geraldine chaplin in women in love
> now? damn, i hafta read the quijote for class, btw amis, and i am so
> not arsed im goona goo to gradesaver whats next literary correctness
> by stanley fish n euphalinos n l'architect im only giving valery one
> chance by the bay n then im goona spend summer drunk at the beach wit
> my bitch i decided after one page i wouldnt read alasdair macyntire
> and karl poopers take at the greeks cuz theys a bunch of geeks n
> history n theology has nothing to do wit literature

I'll have what he had.

Will.

On Apr 23, 7:05 pm, sirbl...@hotmail.com wrote:
> best part is the prologue and the chess part plus a nabokov anecdote
> i'd tell you the crappier parts but im too ratarsed to go upstairs n
> look it over again couldv sworn i was goona find a defense of philip
> larkin but that musta been another book plus ive munched the svevo
> bookie which was loony cuz all modernists are male n the only woman is
> a masochist why am i thinking of geraldine chaplin in women in love
> now? damn, i hafta read the quijote for class, btw amis, and i am so
> not arsed im goona goo to gradesaver whats next literary correctness
> by stanley fish n euphalinos n l'architect im only giving valery one
> chance by the bay n then im goona spend summer drunk at the beach wit
> my bitch i decided after one page i wouldnt read alasdair macyntire
> and karl poopers take at the greeks cuz theys a bunch of geeks n
> history n theology has nothing to do wit literature

But who's the masochist woman?

Leisha

On Apr 23, 10:05�pm, sirbl...@hotmail.com wrote:
> best part is the prologue and the chess part plus a nabokov anecdote
> i'd tell you the crappier parts but im too ratarsed to go upstairs n
> look it over again couldv sworn i was goona find a defense of philip
> larkin but that musta been another book plus ive munched the svevo
> bookie which was loony cuz all modernists are male n the only woman is
> a masochist why am i thinking of geraldine chaplin in women in love
> now? damn, i hafta read the quijote for class, btw amis, and i am so
> not arsed im goona goo to gradesaver whats next literary correctness
> by stanley fish n euphalinos n l'architect im only giving valery one
> chance by the bay n then im goona spend summer drunk at the beach wit
> my bitch i decided after one page i wouldnt read alasdair macyntire
> and karl poopers take at the greeks cuz theys a bunch of geeks n
> history n theology has nothing to do wit literature

That's easy for you to say.

wrote in message 
news:50d762fe-25cb-4755-906a-fdc30478c9c5@x35g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> best part is the prologue and the chess part plus a nabokov anecdote
> i'd tell you the crappier parts but im too ratarsed to go upstairs n
> look it over again couldv sworn i was goona find a defense of philip
> larkin but that musta been another book plus ive munched the svevo
> bookie which was loony cuz all modernists are male n the only woman is
> a masochist why am i thinking of geraldine chaplin in women in love
> now? damn, i hafta read the quijote for class, btw amis, and i am so
> not arsed im goona goo to gradesaver whats next literary correctness
> by stanley fish n euphalinos n l'architect im only giving valery one
> chance by the bay n then im goona spend summer drunk at the beach wit
> my bitch i decided after one page i wouldnt read alasdair macyntire
> and karl poopers take at the greeks cuz theys a bunch of geeks n
> history n theology has nothing to do wit literature

I think your lost on Cialis and Xantacs