Atheists 'not fully human', says Cardinal Cormac Murphy O'Connor

<http://richarddawkins.net/article,3846,n,n>

<http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/nocormacpeerage/>


-- 
Sleepalot   aa #1385

Responding to Sleepalot:

> Atheists 'not fully human', says Cardinal Cormac Murphy O'Connor
> 
> <http://richarddawkins.net/article,3846,n,n>
> 
> <http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/nocormacpeerage/>


As the (clearly alcoholic) old fart seemed to be aluding that those who 
do not share his fantasies are not manifesting human potential to the 
fullest sense /his/ fantasies dictate they can and should, one needs to 
be careful about blowing this amateur head-fart out of proportion and 
getting too shrill about it, and by doing so, handing him a martyr-under-
fire position at the end of what looks like a very tedious and pointless 
existence for him.

Just laugh and watch him and his kind fade back into the void.

-- 
 *===( http://www.400monkeys.com/God/
 *===( http://principiadiscordia.com/
 *===( http://www.slackware.com/

On May 21, 2:34 pm, Sleepalot  wrote:
> Atheists 'not fully human', says Cardinal Cormac Murphy O'Connor
>
> <http://richarddawkins.net/article,3846,n,n>
>
> <http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/nocormacpeerage/>
>
> --
> Sleepalot   aa #1385

Well, the Cardinal is correct isnt he !?  An Atheist is only left with
the conclusion that he/she  is only part-human  since they descended
from lower forms of animal life all the way back to a piece of Pond
Scum .  Ive been told many times by Atheists that we are just a
graduated Animal of the Forest seeking to fulfill ones own biological
desires and needs ;   the Cardinal is only agreeing with this pop-
atheist philosophy ... and now the atheist community resents that ?!
Thats rather hypocritical isnt it.

IlBeBauck@gmail.com wrote:
> On May 21, 2:34 pm, Sleepalot  wrote:
>> Atheists 'not fully human', says Cardinal Cormac Murphy O'Connor
>>
>> <http://richarddawkins.net/article,3846,n,n>
>>
>> <http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/nocormacpeerage/>
>>
>> --
>> Sleepalot aa #1385
>
> Well, the Cardinal is correct isnt he !?  An Atheist is only left with
> the conclusion that he/she  is only part-human  since they descended
> from lower forms of animal life all the way back to a piece of Pond
> Scum .  Ive been told many times by Atheists that we are just a
> graduated Animal of the Forest seeking to fulfill ones own biological
> desires and needs ;   the Cardinal is only agreeing with this pop-
> atheist philosophy ... and now the atheist community resents that ?!
> Thats rather hypocritical isnt it.

I detect some serious PKB there.

Our animal instincts combined with our higher minds are what make us 
human. - By us I refer to all of humanity except you; whose mind is clearly 
evolving in reverse, and is currently on a par with that of a garden slug. 
To say that we're not human because we evolved from lesser lifeforms is like 
saying that a chip isn't a chip because a student of cookery said that it 
was once a potato.