Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
misc
announce
answers
consultants
d-i-y
environment
environment.conservation
gov.agency.csa
gov.local
gov.social-security
gov.social-work
misc
philosophy.atheism
philosophy.humanism
philosophy.misc
radio.amateur
railway
sci.astronomy
sci.med.nursing
sci.med.pharmacy
sci.misc
sci.weather
singles
telecom
telecom.broadband
telecom.mobile
telecom.voip
test
transport
transport.air
transport.buses
transport.ferry
transport.london
transport.ride-sharing
  
 
date: 5 Apr 2009 20:06:11 -0000,    group: uk.philosophy.atheism        back       
Re: Believers   
> Parents inculcate belief in
> God in their children for various reasons

Out of habit, to name just one.

> but control does not loom large in
> them I would say.

"If you're bad Jesus/God/Allah will punish you. If you're bad
you'll burn in hell. Etc, etc." If you think religion isn't
about societal control, then you haven't thought about it.
It's also about tribe-identity, but I'm not talking about
the evolutionary aspects of religion, merely the truth rating
of what it sells.

> Don't bother with that, I realise that because God is irrational, it does
> not follow that all irrational things are God.

To be frank, I have no idea of what you mean by "God".

> However, I wonder if it has occurred to you that posting a message in an
> atheist newsgroup saying that religion is irrational is itself an irrational
> question?

It was a statement, really. A statement that many would
agree with. However I don't see why it could be considered
irrational.
date: 5 Apr 2009 20:06:11 -0000   author:   The

Re: Believers   
On 5 Apr 2009 20:06:11 -0000, The  wrote:

>> Parents inculcate belief in
>> God in their children for various reasons
>
>Out of habit, to name just one.
>
>> but control does not loom large in
>> them I would say.
>
>"If you're bad Jesus/God/Allah will punish you. If you're bad
>you'll burn in hell. Etc, etc." If you think religion isn't
>about societal control, then you haven't thought about it.
>It's also about tribe-identity, but I'm not talking about
>the evolutionary aspects of religion, merely the truth rating
>of what it sells.
>
>> Don't bother with that, I realise that because God is irrational, it does
>> not follow that all irrational things are God.
>
>To be frank, I have no idea of what you mean by "God".
>
>> However, I wonder if it has occurred to you that posting a message in an
>> atheist newsgroup saying that religion is irrational is itself an irrational
>> question?
>
>It was a statement, really. A statement that many would
>agree with. However I don't see why it could be considered
>irrational.

Because we already know that.
date: Sun, 05 Apr 2009 16:09:50 -0400   author:   Christopher A. Lee

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us