http://by112w.bay112.mail.live.com/mail/InboxLight.aspx?FolderID=00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000001&InboxSortAscending=False&InboxSortBy=Date&n=1989855543

Please dont undermine the long held very important Tradition of
Marriage which has always been the backbone for a civilized society.
Please dont let anything overshadow what even your own Parents deemed
the correct avenue to take regarding this important issue ;  they
didnt believe in shackin' up or same sex marriage because they knew it
was wrong ;   even people today know its wrong..but the tenet of
atheism (moral relativism so you can do as you wish) makes it
attractive to side toward deviant lifestyles.   Regards.

This is mainly directed at the occassional visitor who may feel
a need to reply to the unwelcome
and unwanted proselytizing of a resident AmeriKKKan fundy troll DILV,
Ilbeback or any number of other aliases..ken

At the risk of boring you and others here to death, dilv is
incapable of intellectual reasoning, he is an evangelical cyber foot
soldier that
has been pyschologically pre-programmed to maintain the devout
message
and has nothing remotely interesting or intellectually challenging to
add to
well trodden religious dogmatic paths.
If you really wish an atheist vs relgious discussion come on over to
UKRC where the discussion, whilst no less frustrating,  is light
years
ahead of the dilv dribble.
(Mark)


It's useless to enter into any type of discussion with this fuckwit.
I've seen it all before
Dave loves to argue, usually by first posing a question or making a
ridiculous statement (A) like Adam and Eve is not a myth, man
actually lived with dinosaurs, the Earth is 6000 years old, or there
is no
proof an asteroid was responsible for extinctions, all designed only
to draw you into his web, but if one directs a reply to the first
issue of (A), the subject will change (as in "Yes, but what about
B,C,D and E") and never addressing your reply to subject (A)


Any attempt to cover B,C,D, or E is doomed to failure, as he then
directs the discussion into another direction.
He'd used this exact same tactic with me and many others.
The best strategy, just not play his game
(Hewy)


Dave is our resident (and unwelcome) evangelical fundamentalist.
He is based in the US and here to preach the gospel. He will not
listen to anything you
say and will continue to post the same invalid arguments no matter
how many times their falsehood is pointed out.


His typical posting consists of material copied from creationist
websites - typically pseudo science and frequently quotations from
credible scientists that have been edited to indicate the opposite
of what the author intended.


If you are fired up with anger and feel compelled to respond, the
regulars here can't stop you, but please understand that nothing you
say will be taken on board and you will simply initiate an endless
stream of posts attempting to preach the gospel to anyone who is
gullible enough to listen.


If you wish to understand the truth about evolution and the science
of our origins, and the erroneous nature of Dave's arguments, then
this is a good starting point:
http://www.talkorigins.org/


Search on "quote mining" to expose the falsehood of his quotations
from credible scientists.
ntalist. He is based in the
US and here to preach the gospel. He will not listen to anything you
say and will continue to post the same invalid arguments no matter
how many times their falsehood is pointed out.


His typical posting consists of material copied from creationist
websites - typically pseudo science and frequently quotations from
credible scientists that have been edited to indicate the opposite
of what the author intended.


If you are fired up with anger and feel compelled to respond, the
regulars here can't stop you, but please understand that nothing you
say will be taken on board and you will simply initiate an endless
stream of posts attempting to preach the gospel to anyone who is
gullible enough to listen.


If you wish to understand the truth about evolution and the science
of our origins, and the erroneous nature of Dave's arguments, then
this is a good starting point:
http://www.talkorigins.org/
Search on "quote mining" to expose the falsehood of his quotations
from credible scientists.
(Ian Smith)


Please be aware of a seriously delusional fundamentalist
Xtian troll who will relentlessly attempt to push his own perversly
demented
version of Taliban-like morals, anti-abortion, anti-science, anti-
logic, anti- sex,
anti-(any other religion other than their own) ideas, and will, no
doubt, try to engage you in another of his useless, endless,
mindless, ceaseless, pointless, neverending, purposeless,
senseless, relentless, incessant conversations whose only intent is
pushing his point of view to the exclusion of any others.
The best course of action is to just ignore/killfile this
complete and utter waste of human evolution..Ken

On Aug 18, 11:12 am, Ken  wrote:
> This is mainly directed at the occassional visitor who may feel
> a need to reply to the unwelcome
> and unwanted proselytizing of a resident AmeriKKKan fundy troll DILV,
> Ilbeback or any number of other aliases..ken
>
> At the risk of boring you and others here to death, dilv is
> incapable of intellectual reasoning, he is an evangelical cyber foot
> soldier that
> has been pyschologically pre-programmed to maintain the devout
> message
> and has nothing remotely interesting or intellectually challenging to
> add to
> well trodden religious dogmatic paths.
> If you really wish an atheist vs relgious discussion come on over to
> UKRC where the discussion, whilst no less frustrating,  is light
> years
> ahead of the dilv dribble.
> (Mark)
>
> It's useless to enter into any type of discussion with this fuckwit.
> I've seen it all before
> Dave loves to argue, usually by first posing a question or making a
> ridiculous statement (A) like Adam and Eve is not a myth, man
> actually lived with dinosaurs, the Earth is 6000 years old, or there
> is no
> proof an asteroid was responsible for extinctions, all designed only
> to draw you into his web, but if one directs a reply to the first
> issue of (A), the subject will change (as in "Yes, but what about
> B,C,D and E") and never addressing your reply to subject (A)
>
> Any attempt to cover B,C,D, or E is doomed to failure, as he then
> directs the discussion into another direction.
> He'd used this exact same tactic with me and many others.
> The best strategy, just not play his game
> (Hewy)
>
> Dave is our resident (and unwelcome) evangelical fundamentalist.
> He is based in the US and here to preach the gospel. He will not
> listen to anything you
> say and will continue to post the same invalid arguments no matter
> how many times their falsehood is pointed out.
>
> His typical posting consists of material copied from creationist
> websites - typically pseudo science and frequently quotations from
> credible scientists that have been edited to indicate the opposite
> of what the author intended.
>
> If you are fired up with anger and feel compelled to respond, the
> regulars here can't stop you, but please understand that nothing you
> say will be taken on board and you will simply initiate an endless
> stream of posts attempting to preach the gospel to anyone who is
> gullible enough to listen.
>
> If you wish to understand the truth about evolution and the science
> of our origins, and the erroneous nature of Dave's arguments, then
> this is a good starting point:http://www.talkorigins.org/
>
> Search on "quote mining" to expose the falsehood of his quotations
> from credible scientists.
> ntalist. He is based in the
> US and here to preach the gospel. He will not listen to anything you
> say and will continue to post the same invalid arguments no matter
> how many times their falsehood is pointed out.
>
> His typical posting consists of material copied from creationist
> websites - typically pseudo science and frequently quotations from
> credible scientists that have been edited to indicate the opposite
> of what the author intended.
>
> If you are fired up with anger and feel compelled to respond, the
> regulars here can't stop you, but please understand that nothing you
> say will be taken on board and you will simply initiate an endless
> stream of posts attempting to preach the gospel to anyone who is
> gullible enough to listen.
>
> If you wish to understand the truth about evolution and the science
> of our origins, and the erroneous nature of Dave's arguments, then
> this is a good starting point:http://www.talkorigins.org/
> Search on "quote mining" to expose the falsehood of his quotations
> from credible scientists.
> (Ian Smith)
>
> Please be aware of a seriously delusional fundamentalist
> Xtian troll who will relentlessly attempt to push his own perversly
> demented
> version of Taliban-like morals, anti-abortion, anti-science, anti-
> logic, anti- sex,
> anti-(any other religion other than their own) ideas, and will, nore
> doubt, try to engage you in another of his useless, endless,
> mindless, ceaseless, pointless, neverending, purposeless,
> senseless, relentless, incessant conversations whose only intent is
> pushing his point of view to the exclusion of any others.
> The best course of action is to just ignore/killfile this
> complete and utter waste of human evolution..Ken

REPLY:  Thats strange...your own Parents knew and were 100% convicted
that Marriage is a vital Foundation for America ;  and Ill bet they
were atheists too . So, what happened with you ?  When did you become
friends with a deviant immoral Culture that is bent of destroying the
fabric of a civil America ?  Do you recall the exact date that this
occured with yourself ?  Thanks for sharing.

On Aug 18, 9:12 am, Ken  wrote: (troll alert
snipped for brevity)


Congrads to you, Ian, Graham, Steve, Mark, Hewy, DavidWG, Dr.Hal0nf1r£
$, Alwyn, Christopher A. Lee, in addition to whomever I may have
missed for successfully shuting down the pointless banterings with
DILV

IlBeBauck@gmail.com wrote:
> http://by112w.bay112.mail.live.com/mail/InboxLight.aspx?FolderID=00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000001&InboxSortAscending=False&InboxSortBy=Date&n=1989855543
>
> Please dont undermine the long held very important Tradition of
> Marriage which has always been the backbone for a civilized society.
> Please dont let anything overshadow what even your own Parents deemed
> the correct avenue to take regarding this important issue ;  they
> didnt believe in shackin' up or same sex marriage because they knew it
> was wrong ;   even people today know its wrong..but the tenet of
> atheism (moral relativism so you can do as you wish) makes it
> attractive to side toward deviant lifestyles.   Regards.

Piss off Dimwit: In case you missed it this is a UK Atheist group. - Yes I 
know, I'm a Pagan; but I'm not being disruptive with my beliefs - You, on 
the other hand, are - So goodbye Dimwit: Keep walking in a straight 
line...That's the way...UFO...Don't bother with a postcard, just leave. Bye.
-- 

http://kkomp.com - Delving beyond the comfort zone.
Check out the kkomp RSS feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/kkomp/kzOS

http://www.kustomkomputa.co.uk
Personalised Desktop Computers

wrote in message 
news:776b5916-2d70-4356-843a-b5e834029f71@25g2000hsx.googlegroups.com...
> http://by112w.bay112.mail.live.com/mail/InboxLight.aspx?FolderID=00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000001&InboxSortAscending=False&InboxSortBy=Date&n=1989855543
>
> Please dont undermine the long held very important Tradition of
> Marriage which has always been the backbone for a civilized society.
> Please dont let anything overshadow what even your own Parents deemed
> the correct avenue to take regarding this important issue ;  they
> didnt believe in shackin' up or same sex marriage because they knew it
> was wrong ;

I should be grateful if you would explain to me, (a person who thinks that 
children have the best chance if they are  brought up in a marriage between 
a man and woman), that you think it is right for a man and woman to have a 
loving marriage  instread of living together, but that being married is 
wrong for a couple who are homosexual.  It seems to me that encourages 
promiscuity among homosexuals and means that they are less likely to have a 
stable and rewarding relationship.