W hen i was an atheist,  I found myself refusing to examine any
potential evidence that would jeopardize maintaining the entitlement
to living life the way i saw fit. This included such things as the
uniqueness of our Planet, the Universe and its finetuned phsyics
parameters, the incredible complexity found in the DNA molecule,  and
the many other wonders of life . I took for granted the sun shining
down on me when outside..even though its some 93,000,000 mile
away ...yet it feels just right .   How our Lungs are quite compatible
for the precise amount of gasses that make up our atmosphere and how
the atmoshperic pressure is just right.  How the tilt of the earth,
the rotation of the earth,  the magnetic pull of the Moon on the
earth,  and all the MANY other alleged 'accidents'  , were...just
right.  I found my lifestyle , my entitlement to live as i desired,
to be so strong , that,  virtually nothing else mattered .  I had
placed mySELF at the center of the Universe being the most important
thing there is .  And, i believed i had the right to that liberty.
Now that several decades have passed,  how silly I was to think that I
was numero uno.  It is by the grace of God that he reaches us , and it
is by our cooperation that we invite him into our lives ;  first...a
little at a time...then....more and more as we learn to have humility
by making the Creator more important than ourselves. As ALL of our
modern science Founders can attest,  only a relationship with the
Creator offers deep meaning and true purpose to life ; otherwise,
everything is just superficial at best , and , short-lived.

Yet you still avoid answering any of the questions recently posed to
you in here.

Why is that?

On Jul 25, 9:07 pm, Ken  wrote:
> Yet you still avoid answering any of the questions recently posed to
> you in here.
>
> Why is that?

REPLY:  This isnt the proper thread to ask this question ;  many of
the questions (as you know) are repeat questions which ive answered in
the past. Some of the questions are inflamatory  which i dont wish to
participate in.  However, id be pleased to answer questions the NG
members may have along the lines of God, Creation, the universe being
very intelligently designed, my former life as 'an atheist' , the
Bible, why true atheism cant be lived out, my conversion experience,
real scientific discovery , age of the earth, proof for Christ , why
one needs him, and simular....if a new Post is started having the
title of 'Questions'  .

On Jul 26, 4:06 am, "IlBeBa...@gmail.com"  wrote:
> On Jul 25, 9:07 pm, Ken  wrote:
>
> > Yet you still avoid answering any of the questions recently posed to
> > you in here.
>
> > Why is that?
>
> REPLY:  This isnt the proper thread to ask this question ;  


Given your avoidism, IT NEVER IS isn't it, you asshole

many of
> the questions (as you know--NO I DON'T) are repeat questions which ive answered in
> the past.

MORE BULLCRAP and AVOIDISM............
Remember your 1st Psalm of Avoidism?
(Pslam I)
Never answer a question directly.
What would that prove ?
That you give credence to their sinning ways ?
That you're no better than a mere question answerer ?
Jesus spoke only in meandering riddles, so learn from the master.
Of course, when reminded that you didn't answer a direct question SAY
"I did answer it !"
This will then completely confuse your assailant.



What is so INFLAMATORY about revealing your so called "education"?

You're the one always asking INFLAMATORY questions about people's sex
lives, making unreasonable, unfounded, unsubstantial, and unsupported
statements about religion and pseudoscience, yet somehow can't find
the time to answer these NON-INFLAMATORY questions about yourself

What is the highest level of education you reached?
Do you have a professional qualification and if so what?
To what level did you study physics and biology?
What qualifies you to lecture us on your religion?
Why is the account of the creation in Genesis so confused and
scientifically illiterate?
What evidence do you have for your alleged theistic creator other
than
your customary arguments from ignorance and incredulity?
Why was your alleged intelligent designer so bad at designing?


BTW----->Why not look up what "Simular" means?
Being that you're too fucking stupid and lazy to do so, I will"

One that simulates; a pretender.
adj.
Simulated; sham.

In other words, LEARN TO SPELL,YA FUCKING BONEHEADED HS DROPOUT

On Jul 26, 7:44 am, Ken  wrote:

> BTW----->Why not look up what "Simular" means?
> Being that you're too fucking stupid and lazy to do so, I will"
>
> One that simulates; a pretender.
> adj.
> Simulated; sham.
>
> In other words, LEARN TO SPELL,YA FUCKING BONEHEADED HS DROPOUT

LMAO@ DILV's use of simular------sham, fraud, fake, pretender..all
fits him and his religious shite to a "T"
Sandy

X-No-Archive: yes


 wrote in message 
news:a37627a7-9dd8-4945-bfd1-e30bd2321723@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 25, 9:07 pm, Ken  wrote:
> Yet you still avoid answering any of the questions recently posed to
> you in here.
>
> Why is that?


***********************
REPLY:  This isnt the proper thread to ask this question ;
***********************
One thing you are not and that is the keeper of this ng.
YOU do not control who post what, where or how...........I'm afraid.


*********************
many of
the questions (as you know) are repeat questions which ive answered in
the past.
********************

There are literally hundreds you have not.......



*******************
Some of the questions are inflamatory  which i dont wish to
participate in.  However, id be pleased to answer questions the NG
members may have along the lines of God, Creation, the universe being
very intelligently designed,
*******************

There have been hundreds.........


****************
the
Bible,
***************

.....you are joking..?   right?



**************
why true atheism cant be lived out,
**************

...but it can.... and is...  by millions and millions of people.   Millions.



**************
real scientific discovery ,
**************

...yes,  lets..?




*************
age of the earth,
*************

Yes....?   please don't suggest it's around 6,500 years old......   please..





************
proof for Christ ,
************

...do you have ANY....??




************
why
one needs him, and simular
************

When you have the evidence for *him*   then we might discuss if we really 
need *him*....
Until you provide the evidence we need not consider the hypothesis..
As to "simular"  ....well, let's just hope it's a typo eh..



************
....if a new Post is started having the
title of 'Questions'  .
************

Oh do give up with this ridiculous charade...
You have not, do not, will not and can not answer most, if not all, the 
questions posted here because YOU are incapable of doing so....
There are forums where individuals argue *your* case very well and 
coherently but you are just pathetically incapable..
Further, as I started out saying, YOU do not keep this ng,  it is not you 
who decides how posts are made.... any attempt to do so will attract 
derision and contempt.


Mark

wrote

>W hen i was an atheist,  I found myself refusing to examine any
> potential evidence that would jeopardize maintaining the entitlement
> to living life the way i saw fit.

Something that hasn't changed then!

You were wrong then and you are wrong now.

Your basic premise is flawed. Just as if someone sees something odd in the 
sky, it takes a great leap to suggest it is a vehicle with intelligent 
beings inside, you make a great leap from seeing the wonders of the world 
and proclaiming an intelligence to be responsible. The logic of both is 
fundamentally wrong.

Any scientist will acknowledge the way the world is right for us. If it 
weren't we wouldn't be here. But to conclude there is purpose is to make a 
claim without any supporting evidence. It is a wild guess which can be shown 
to be wrong. Science shows how things have naturally developed and that they 
weren't always as they are now. Things developed to a stage where we can 
exist on the earth. In the past we would perish. The Earth has been here far 
longer without us than with us, so to suggest that it is here especially for 
us is ludicrous.

You refuse to examine the evidence.

Steve M

IlBeBauck@gmail.com wrote:
> On Jul 25, 9:07 pm, Ken  wrote:
>> Yet you still avoid answering any of the questions recently posed to
>> you in here.
>>
>> Why is that?

Welcome to Dimwit's Delusional Dreamworld of Bullcrap:
>
> REPLY:  This isnt the proper thread to ask this question ;

He thinks he's become moderator if this NG.

>  many of
> the questions (as you know) are repeat questions which ive answered in
> the past.

Pure fantasy and a cop out: Dimwit has never answered most questions put to 
him.

> Some of the questions are inflamatory  which i dont wish to
> participate in.

He doesn't want to answer IOW because he can't.

>  However, id be pleased to answer questions the NG
> members may have along the lines of God, Creation,

Fantasy

> the universe being
> very intelligently designed,

Fantasy

> my former life as 'an atheist' ,

He was never an Atheist

> the
> Bible,

Fantasy

> why true atheism cant be lived out,

Crap and falsehood

> my conversion experience,

Do tell anyway: I could do with a laugh.

> real scientific discovery ,

Which he hasn't a clue about.

> age of the earth,

All witnessed personally by Dimwit; of course.

> proof for Christ , why
> one needs him, and simular

All delusions

....if a new Post is started having the
> title of 'Questions'  .

Like I said; Welcome to Dimwit's Delusional Dreamworld of Bullcrap.
-- 

http://kkomp.com - Delving beyond the comfort zone.
Check out the kkomp RSS feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/kkomp/kzOS

http://www.kustomkomputa.co.uk
Personalised Desktop Computers