How Old Do Evolutionists Say the Universe Is? 4

Evolutionists can undoubtedly resolve these time contradictions—but at
the cost of rejecting some cherished belief. Perhaps they will accept
the possibility that light traveled much faster in the past.
Measurements exist which support this revolutionary idea. Maybe they
will conclude that the big bang never occurred, or that heavy elements
were somehow in the first and only generation of stars, or that stars
degrade, but new stars don’t evolve. Much evidence supports each of
these ideas, and all are consistent with a recent creation.

Few evolutionists are aware of these contradictions. However, as more
powerful telescopes begin peering even farther into space, these
problems will worsen and more attention will be focused on them. If
scientists find, as one might expect, even more distant stars and
galaxies with heavy elements, problems with the claimed age of the
universe will no longer be the secret of a few evolutionists (9).

9.	Dietrick E. Thomsen, “Farthest Galaxy Is Cosmic Question,” Science
News, Vol. 133, 23 April 1988, pp. 262–263.

M. Mitchell Waldrop, “The Farthest Galaxies: A New Champion,” Science,
Vol. 241, 19 August 1988, p. 905.

Dietrick E. Thomsen, “Galaxies in a Primitive State,” Science News,
Vol. 133, 23 January 1988, p. 52.

M. Mitchell Waldrop, “Pushing Back the Redshift Limit,” Science, Vol.
239, 12 February 1988, pp. 727–728.

http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/FAQ119.html#wp1573636

The only time creation and science should EVER be used in the
same sentence is when the words "is not" has been inserted between
them