Pahu78@gmail.com wrote:
> How Old Do Evolutionists Say the Universe Is? 3
> 

Do you think that posting the same drivel twice makes it better?

Those who read this group are intelligent enough to spot that, 
logically, pointing out things we don't know about science doesn't 
contribute anything to your own hypothesis. This is called the 
argument from ignorance (or the argument from incredulity).

Remember, there is infinitely more supporting evidence for both 
evolution and the big bang than there is for special creation, which 
remains a totally unsupported hypothesis.

regards, Ian

Ian Smith:

> Do you think that posting the same drivel twice makes it better?

Do you think he can read - or if he can - he can understand your
argument?

This pathetic lad is off limits for reason.
-- 
sola dosis facit venenum