|
|
|
date: Sun, 18 May 2008 14:11:56 +0100,
group: uk.philosophy.atheism
back
discovery institute
X-No-Archive: yes
This is an odd organisation...
Hunting around it seems particularly above board and have a wide, scientific
based membership.
Then, I discover, they become reticent about religion and it's members when
asked, saying they don't check who are atheists and who are believers
(..suspicious in itself but mindful that they promote essays on questioning
evolution, must be aware that accusations could/would be made that the
writer was religious minded )
Joining and becoming a member seems little more than filling in a form and
handing over credit card details [$50 - $1000 pa membership]
Then [this takes a bit of digging around to get here - it's not easily seen
from their home page(s)] I see that this is linked to the 'Discovery
Society' that ..."come together to support the work of the Discovery
Institute - and disseminate the message...."
Here's their brief......
"As a Discovery Society member you will be supporting cutting-edge research
that challenges Darwinian evolution and validates the intelligent design of
life and the universe. Your membership will also help us promote a more
balanced science education policy and powerful new videos and curricular
materials."
"The Society will provide you with resources and learning opportunities that
will equip you to spread the word."
That couldn't be clearer at all.
This organisations 'raison d'etre' is to challenge and obfuscate
'traditional' evolution theory under the guise of science....
Then I discover this piece about their "functions", as they describe it...
How Discovery Institute Functions
"Discovery Institute fellows submit their analyses and proposals for
dialogue through seminars, conferences, and debates; they produce reports,
articles, books, Congressional testimony, films and an interactive Internet
website that helps spread the knowledge of the Institute's ideas. They also
consult with elected and appointed officials, business people, academics,
media and the general public to show how 21st century humanity can benefit
from the principles, policies, and practices advocated by the Institute.
The point of view Discovery brings to its work includes a belief in
God-given reason and the permanency of human nature; the principles of
representative democracy and public service expounded by the American
Founders; free market economics domestically and internationally; the social
requirement to balance personal liberty with responsibility; the spirit of
voluntarism crucial to civil society; the continuing validity of American
international leadership; and the potential of science and technology to
promote an improved future for individuals, families and communities."
Aha........ there's the clue, tucked away, dozens of pages deep in the site
heirarchy....
"The point of view Discovery brings to its work includes a belief in
God-given reason"
So, at last, there we have it. I'd call it covert disingenuity.
They are an organisation that is psuedo scientific in the sense that it has
a religious underlying agenda rather than no agenda other than scientific
discovery. Very big difference.
I note that dilv posts this site and its membership as some kind of
confirmation of scientific query over evolution when it is thunderously
clear any free thinking scientist would not touch membership of this
organisation with a barge pole.
I suggest that any/all research submitted to this organisation will have
been excluded or sanitised prioir to publication if it did not meet the
criteria of the religious bias.
Another dilv 'faux pas' then.......
Mark
date: Sun, 18 May 2008 14:11:56 +0100
author: mark
|
Re: discovery institute
On May 18, 6:11 am, "mark" wrote:
> I note that dilv posts this site and its membership as some kind of
> confirmation of scientific query over evolution when it is thunderously
> clear any free thinking scientist would not touch membership of this
> organisation with a barge pole.
> I suggest that any/all research submitted to this organisation will have
> been excluded or sanitised prioir to publication if it did not meet the
> criteria of the religious bias.
> Another dilv 'faux pas' then.......
>
> Mark
The Discovery Institute, ..where lying religious liars go for their
latest fix
What else would one expect from DILV?
date: Sun, 18 May 2008 08:40:47 -0700 (PDT)
author: Ken
|
Re: discovery institute
See further the 'Wedge Strategy' of said Institute:
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wedge_strategy>
In article ,
"mark" wrote:
> X-No-Archive: yes
>
> This is an odd organisation...
> Hunting around it seems particularly above board and have a wide, scientific
> based membership.
> Then, I discover, they become reticent about religion and it's members when
> asked, saying they don't check who are atheists and who are believers
> (..suspicious in itself but mindful that they promote essays on questioning
> evolution, must be aware that accusations could/would be made that the
> writer was religious minded )
> Joining and becoming a member seems little more than filling in a form and
> handing over credit card details [$50 - $1000 pa membership]
> Then [this takes a bit of digging around to get here - it's not easily seen
> from their home page(s)] I see that this is linked to the 'Discovery
> Society' that ..."come together to support the work of the Discovery
> Institute - and disseminate the message...."
>
> Here's their brief......
>
> "As a Discovery Society member you will be supporting cutting-edge research
> that challenges Darwinian evolution and validates the intelligent design of
> life and the universe. Your membership will also help us promote a more
> balanced science education policy and powerful new videos and curricular
> materials."
> "The Society will provide you with resources and learning opportunities that
> will equip you to spread the word."
>
>
> That couldn't be clearer at all.
> This organisations 'raison d'etre' is to challenge and obfuscate
> 'traditional' evolution theory under the guise of science....
>
>
> Then I discover this piece about their "functions", as they describe it...
>
> How Discovery Institute Functions
>
> "Discovery Institute fellows submit their analyses and proposals for
> dialogue through seminars, conferences, and debates; they produce reports,
> articles, books, Congressional testimony, films and an interactive Internet
> website that helps spread the knowledge of the Institute's ideas. They also
> consult with elected and appointed officials, business people, academics,
> media and the general public to show how 21st century humanity can benefit
> from the principles, policies, and practices advocated by the Institute.
>
> The point of view Discovery brings to its work includes a belief in
> God-given reason and the permanency of human nature; the principles of
> representative democracy and public service expounded by the American
> Founders; free market economics domestically and internationally; the social
> requirement to balance personal liberty with responsibility; the spirit of
> voluntarism crucial to civil society; the continuing validity of American
> international leadership; and the potential of science and technology to
> promote an improved future for individuals, families and communities."
>
> Aha........ there's the clue, tucked away, dozens of pages deep in the site
> heirarchy....
>
> "The point of view Discovery brings to its work includes a belief in
> God-given reason"
>
> So, at last, there we have it. I'd call it covert disingenuity.
> They are an organisation that is psuedo scientific in the sense that it has
> a religious underlying agenda rather than no agenda other than scientific
> discovery. Very big difference.
> I note that dilv posts this site and its membership as some kind of
> confirmation of scientific query over evolution when it is thunderously
> clear any free thinking scientist would not touch membership of this
> organisation with a barge pole.
> I suggest that any/all research submitted to this organisation will have
> been excluded or sanitised prioir to publication if it did not meet the
> criteria of the religious bias.
> Another dilv 'faux pas' then.......
>
>
>
> Mark
date: Sun, 18 May 2008 17:18:31 +0100
author: Alwyn
|
Re: discovery institute
X-No-Archive: yes
"Alwyn" wrote in message
news:alwyn-2572CD.17183018052008@news.virginmedia.com...
> See further the 'Wedge Strategy' of said Institute:
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wedge_strategy>
Ah......... ok.
Thanks for that.
That about covers it comprehensively doesn't it?
Amazing, more so then, that dilv posts this up as credible information when
it is no more than an ID organisation, sanitising it's outward appearance to
guard against compromising US Amendment laws (...amongst other things...).
Encouraging to read however that some members feel the 'wedge strategy' has
now outlived its purpose, especially since the
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District ID
court case.
A thoroughly discredited organisation that dilv should have distanced
himself from, rather than promoted and should have understood they were not
(unbiased) scientists at all..... merely ID christians with an enormous
agenda....
Disgraceful
Mark
date: Sun, 18 May 2008 17:53:13 +0100
author: mark
|
Re: discovery institute
mark wrote:
>
> Amazing, more so then, that dilv posts this up as credible information when
> it is no more than an ID organisation, sanitising it's outward appearance to
> guard against compromising US Amendment laws (...amongst other things...).
> Encouraging to read however that some members feel the 'wedge strategy' has
> now outlived its purpose, especially since the
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District ID
> court case.
> A thoroughly discredited organisation that dilv should have distanced
This is how ID works. Go through your creationist material and cross
out all references to god or creator and insert 'designer' instead -
and there you have it, science!
The history is that the evangelicals have fought for years to get
god/prayers/creation into state schools, but religion in a state
school is prohibited by the constitution.
Thus Creationism became Creation Science, until the US courts
declared it to be religion under a different name.
So, Creation Science became Intelligent Design, until Kitzmiller v
Dover found ID to be religion under a different name. In this court
case the judge caught the proponents of ID lying about their motives
and in the evidence of Michael Behe (the 'microbiologist' darling of
the ID movement) he was forced to admit that the science of ID was
no better than astrology (i.e. not science at all). In fact,
researchers had uncovered an original draft of the ID textbook for
schools "Of Pandas and People" in which the word 'designer' was
still shown as god and creator. As the case developed, the Discovery
Institute tried to distance itself from the case as it could see
that ID was being exposed for what it is.
ID's public credibility (it never had any scientific credibility)
was blown out of the water there and then. Interestingly, Judge
Jones was a Bush right-wing christian appointee.
regards, Ian
date: Sun, 18 May 2008 19:13:30 +0100
author: Ian Smith
|
Re: discovery institute
"mark" wrote:
>Here's their brief......
>
>"As a Discovery Society member you will be supporting cutting-edge research
>that challenges Darwinian evolution and validates the intelligent design of
>life and the universe. Your membership will also help us promote a more
>balanced science education policy and powerful new videos and curricular
>materials."
>"The Society will provide you with resources and learning opportunities that
>will equip you to spread the word."
>
>That couldn't be clearer at all.
>This organisations 'raison d'etre' is to challenge and obfuscate
>'traditional' evolution theory under the guise of science....
>
Ahhhh - you were so close! (Imo)
"promote (...) new videos and curricular materials."
That's what I think ID is about - market share. Creationist authors
writing Creationist books, printed by Creationist publishers, sold
to Creationist schools, to make a new generation of Creationist
authors and publishers, selling Creationist shite to the world.
They're spending plenty of money on this, so it's a fair bet that
they plan to make a lot of money from it.
--
Sleepalot aa #1385
date: Mon, 19 May 2008 22:51:29 +0100
author: Sleepalot
|
Re: discovery institute
On May 19, 2:51 pm, Sleepalot wrote:
> "mark" wrote:
> >Here's their brief......
>
> >"As a Discovery Society member you will be supporting cutting-edge research
> >that challenges Darwinian evolution and validates the intelligent design of
> >life and the universe. Your membership will also help us promote a more
> >balanced science education policy and powerful new videos and curricular
> >materials."
> >"The Society will provide you with resources and learning opportunities that
> >will equip you to spread the word."
>
> >That couldn't be clearer at all.
> >This organisations 'raison d'etre' is to challenge and obfuscate
> >'traditional' evolution theory under the guise of science....
>
> Ahhhh - you were so close! (Imo)
>
> "promote (...) new videos and curricular materials."
>
> That's what I think ID is about - market share. Creationist authors
> writing Creationist books, printed by Creationist publishers, sold
> to Creationist schools, to make a new generation of Creationist
> authors and publishers, selling Creationist shite to the world.
>
> They're spending plenty of money on this, so it's a fair bet that
> they plan to make a lot of money from it.
>
> --
> Sleepalot aa #1385
Which just goes to show that there sure are a LOT of dumb asses on
this planet
date: Mon, 19 May 2008 18:15:36 -0700 (PDT)
author: Ken
|
|
|