|
|
|
date: Sat, 10 May 2008 19:54:54 -0700 (PDT),
group: uk.philosophy.atheism
back
POPULAR ATHEISM MISCONCEPTION: "There is NO personal creator"
Hello. Each weekend we take another look at a P.A.M. This weekend, we
look at the rationale behind the common assertion that 'there is no
God' .This popular retort is the foundation of the atheism faith.
While this assertion is shared amongst all atheists, it is a total
IMPOSSIBILITY that any atheist could absolutely know for sure. In
order to know this as a total fact, one would have to be able to go
around the Universe to make sure, to know everything about
everything , etc... Therefore, it is the most irrational thing to
assert . The assertion is simply a desperate hopeful desire that
there is no God and the reason is : Because the atheist desires not to
have any limitation on how to live his/her life . The following is
what we have for our universe which no amount of natural causes,
materials, and random chance could ever provide :
1. We have a Universe that came into being
out of nothing when it didnt have to .2. We have a Universe with over
250 fine tuned , life enabling,constants for this tiny remote planet
called Earth.3. LIfe that has been observed to arise only from
existing life and not arise spontaneously.4. LIfe consists of
thousands and even millions of volumes of empirically detectable
specified complexity as found in DNA information/messages (and is
therefore more than just the non living chemicals it contains).5. LIfe
which changes cyclically and only within a limited range.6. Life which
cannot be built or modified gradually (IE: irreduciblecomplexity).7.
Life that leaves a fossil record of fully formed creatures thatappear
suddenly, do not change, and then disappear suddenly.
... An honest look at the facts suggests creation, not
macroevolution/atheism,is true. And it suggests a highly intelligent
personal
Creator has been at work , not 'Natural Causes' which imply no
purpose, no ultimate meaning, nor infinite worth or dignity toward
Humankind ... as much as the atheist NEEDS it to be so for maximum
personal freedom (lifestyle choices).
date: Sat, 10 May 2008 19:54:54 -0700 (PDT)
author: unknown
|
Re: More BS DILV SPAM
(0)
date: Sat, 10 May 2008 20:13:17 -0700 (PDT)
author: Ken
|
Re: More BS DILV SPAM
Ken wrote:
> (0)
Atheists have already looked into said rationale; and they concluded that
there is no god.
Whilst it is virtually impossible to prove a negative; such as "There is no
god." - it is totally impossible to prove a lie to be truth. Even attempting
to do so only means the employment of more lies, half-truths, misquotes, and
other dishonesty - Just like DiLV's standard practices.
"...the reason is : Because the atheist desires not to
have any limitation on how to live his/her life ."
It is worrying to think that anyone would actively seek and deliberately
employ limitations. It is a shame that this DiLV waste-of-space is incapable
of exercising any self-control and personal responsibility. He has to fall
back on external control mechanisms because he lacking a large element of
his persona.
<sniptacious>
... An honest look at the "facts" as DiLV portrays them suggests a woeful
lack of education, not
<sniptilicious>
"...as much as the atheist NEEDS it to be so for maximum
personal freedom (lifestyle choices)."
If you dislike freedom so much Dimwit; just stop a passing police officer
and tell them where you hide your gun in your pants; or confess your sexual
perversions to a shrink
--
http://www.kustomkomputa.co.uk
Personalised Desktop Computers
date: Sun, 11 May 2008 12:28:28 +0100
author: Dr.Hal0nf1r?$ lid
|
Re: More BS DILV SPAM
On May 11, 4:28 am, "Dr.Hal0nf1r£$"
<fem...@nospam.kustomkomputa.co.uk.invalid> wrote:
Dimwit: Because the atheist desires not to
> have any limitation on how to live his/her life ."
>
> It is worrying to think that anyone would actively seek and deliberately
> employ limitations. It is a shame that this DiLV waste-of-space is incapable
> of exercising any self-control and personal responsibility. He has to fall> back on external control mechanisms because he lacking a large element of
> his persona.
Dimwit had no morals, no sense of right and wrong, wasn't
able to control his homosexual urges, drank too much, did whatever
drugs he coulod get his hands on, then found that he desperately
needed some imaginary sky fairy
and it's accompanying punishment for "sinful behavior" to save
himself
from himself,
Now he imagines that all others must be suffering from the
same deficiencies that he had with his miserable life
Dimwit can't fathom that we're normal and he's the fuckin' psycho-
nutsack!
date: Sun, 11 May 2008 08:33:40 -0700 (PDT)
author: Ken
|
|
|