|
|
|
date: Fri, 9 May 2008 12:13:58 -0700 (PDT),
group: uk.philosophy.atheism
back
Time 4 another DILV ignore this troll announcement
This troll also known as dumbfuck dave from lake evil has preaching
this same crap
for years now in dozen's of different groups on the internet.
No one has EVER agreeded with him.
He makes enemies quicker than a fascist dressed in KKK robes at a rap
concert
Even other Xtians, who at first seem to accept his ideas, soon learn
they also have little or nothing in common with the ranting fool as
he
lectures them in that their view of religion is completely wrong
He's an asshole, always been one and always will be one
We have here a seriously delusional
Xtian troll who is relentlessly attempting to push his own
perversly demented Taliban- like morals, anti-abortion, anti-science,
anti-logic, anti- sex, anti-(any other religion other than their own)
ideas, and will, no doubt, try to engage you in another of his
useless, endless,
mindless, ceaseless, pointless, neverending, purposeless,
senseless, relentless, incessant conversations whose only intent is
pushing his delusional points of view to the exclusion of any others.
The best course of action is to just ignore/killfile this
complete and utter waste of 3.5 billion years of human evolution
All of us are truly sorry about this unfortunate situation
(CCPed from Ian)
Dave is a hard line creationist who posts on this and other
newsgroups. Many regular contributors to this group have concluded
that responding to Dave only prompts him to post again with further
nonsense and is thus counter productive. Thus many have decided not
to respond to Dave's postings.
No-one has the right to stop you posting as you wish, but those that
have done so over a long period of time realise that in this case it
is completely futile. We invite you to join us in this initiative to
starve Dave of the oxygen of publicity and join us in not responding
to his posts
(CCPed from Mark)
The whole process of this, and other usenet groups, is...... well,
debate.
However, dilv is incapable of debate: there is a posting history to
his
style, content and format and it is well known to any regular here.
It's
not about censorship or preventing debate it's about dilv being a
*troll*
type evangelist [..unfortunately like so many ng's, there is a
resident
evangelical, religious devout ] that does not, will not or can not
debate.
He is not here to discuss either atheism or his religious
conviction.... he
is here to tell you - mostly courtesy of regurgitated 'fundy' websites
-
that atheism is this, that or the other, it is immoral and therefore
evil.
He is also here to state religious conviction. He will not, nor can
he,
enter into any meaningful discourse. The regulars here are aware of
it and
post along the same lines as this post from time to time. Newbies
and
passers by just drop right into the trap....
At the risk of boring you and others here to death, dilv is incapable
of
intellectual reasoning, he is an evangelical cyber foot soldier that
has
been pyschologically pre-programmed to maintain the devout message and
has
nothing remotely interesting or intellectually challenging to add to
well
trodden religious dogmatic paths.
If you really wish an atheist vs relgious discussion come on over to
UKRC
where the discussion, whilst no less frustrating, is light years
ahead of
the dilv dribble.
date: Fri, 9 May 2008 12:13:58 -0700 (PDT)
author: Ken
|
Re: Time 4 another DILV ignore this troll announcement
On May 9, 2:13 pm, Ken wrote:
> This troll also known as dumbfuck dave from lake evil has preaching
> this same crap
> for years now in dozen's of different groups on the internet.
> No one has EVER agreeded with him.
> He makes enemies quicker than a fascist dressed in KKK robes at a rap
> concert
> Even other Xtians, who at first seem to accept his ideas, soon learn
> they also have little or nothing in common with the ranting fool as
> he
> lectures them in that their view of religion is completely wrong
>
> He's an asshole, always been one and always will be one
>
> We have here a seriously delusional
> Xtian troll who is relentlessly attempting to push his own
> perversly demented Taliban- like morals, anti-abortion, anti-science,
> anti-logic, anti- sex, anti-(any other religion other than their own)
> ideas, and will, no doubt, try to engage you in another of his
> useless, endless,
> mindless, ceaseless, pointless, neverending, purposeless,
> senseless, relentless, incessant conversations whose only intent is
> pushing his delusional points of view to the exclusion of any others.
>
> The best course of action is to just ignore/killfile this
> complete and utter waste of 3.5 billion years of human evolution
>
> All of us are truly sorry about this unfortunate situation
>
> (CCPed from Ian)
> Dave is a hard line creationist who posts on this and other
> newsgroups. Many regular contributors to this group have concluded
> that responding to Dave only prompts him to post again with further
> nonsense and is thus counter productive. Thus many have decided not
> to respond to Dave's postings.
> No-one has the right to stop you posting as you wish, but those that
> have done so over a long period of time realise that in this case it
> is completely futile. We invite you to join us in this initiative to
> starve Dave of the oxygen of publicity and join us in not responding
> to his posts
>
> (CCPed from Mark)
> The whole process of this, and other usenet groups, is...... well,
> debate.
> However, dilv is incapable of debate: there is a posting history to
> his
> style, content and format and it is well known to any regular here.
> It's
> not about censorship or preventing debate it's about dilv being a
> *troll*
> type evangelist [..unfortunately like so many ng's, there is a
> resident
> evangelical, religious devout ] that does not, will not or can not
> debate.
> He is not here to discuss either atheism or his religious
> conviction.... he
> is here to tell you - mostly courtesy of regurgitated 'fundy' websites
> -
> that atheism is this, that or the other, it is immoral and therefore
> evil.
> He is also here to state religious conviction. He will not, nor can
> he,
> enter into any meaningful discourse. The regulars here are aware of
> it and
> post along the same lines as this post from time to time. Newbies
> and
> passers by just drop right into the trap....
>
> At the risk of boring you and others here to death, dilv is incapable
> of
> intellectual reasoning, he is an evangelical cyber foot soldier that
> has
> been pyschologically pre-programmed to maintain the devout message and
> has
> nothing remotely interesting or intellectually challenging to add to
> expecwell
> trodden religious dogmatic paths.
> If you really wish an atheist vs relgious discussion come on over to
> UKRC
> where the discussion, whilst no less frustrating, is light years
> ahead of
> the dilv dribble.
REPLY: Should be pretty obvious that Ken being 'an atheist' isnt
able to defend his position and so must resort to defamation and use
of foul language. One would not expect this from a Professional
Retired Chemist . He talks more like a BUCK-NEVVIE ! (Ken wont
know what this british term means..)
date: Fri, 9 May 2008 18:43:02 -0700 (PDT)
author: unknown
|
Re: Time 4 another DILV ignore this troll announcement
IlBeBauck@gmail.com wrote:
> On May 9, 2:13 pm, Ken wrote:
>> This troll also known as dumbfuck dave from lake evil has preaching
>> this same crap
>> for years now in dozen's of different groups on the internet.
>> No one has EVER agreeded with him.
>> He makes enemies quicker than a fascist dressed in KKK robes at a rap
>> concert
>> Even other Xtians, who at first seem to accept his ideas, soon learn
>> they also have little or nothing in common with the ranting fool as
>> he
>> lectures them in that their view of religion is completely wrong
>>
>> He's an asshole, always been one and always will be one
>>
>> We have here a seriously delusional
>> Xtian troll who is relentlessly attempting to push his own
>> perversly demented Taliban- like morals, anti-abortion, anti-science,
>> anti-logic, anti- sex, anti-(any other religion other than their own)
>> ideas, and will, no doubt, try to engage you in another of his
>> useless, endless,
>> mindless, ceaseless, pointless, neverending, purposeless,
>> senseless, relentless, incessant conversations whose only intent is
>> pushing his delusional points of view to the exclusion of any others.
>>
>> The best course of action is to just ignore/killfile this
>> complete and utter waste of 3.5 billion years of human evolution
>>
>> All of us are truly sorry about this unfortunate situation
>>
>> (CCPed from Ian)
>> Dave is a hard line creationist who posts on this and other
>> newsgroups. Many regular contributors to this group have concluded
>> that responding to Dave only prompts him to post again with further
>> nonsense and is thus counter productive. Thus many have decided not
>> to respond to Dave's postings.
>> No-one has the right to stop you posting as you wish, but those that
>> have done so over a long period of time realise that in this case it
>> is completely futile. We invite you to join us in this initiative to
>> starve Dave of the oxygen of publicity and join us in not responding
>> to his posts
>>
>> (CCPed from Mark)
>> The whole process of this, and other usenet groups, is...... well,
>> debate.
>> However, dilv is incapable of debate: there is a posting history to
>> his
>> style, content and format and it is well known to any regular here.
>> It's
>> not about censorship or preventing debate it's about dilv being a
>> *troll*
>> type evangelist [..unfortunately like so many ng's, there is a
>> resident
>> evangelical, religious devout ] that does not, will not or can not
>> debate.
>> He is not here to discuss either atheism or his religious
>> conviction.... he
>> is here to tell you - mostly courtesy of regurgitated 'fundy'
>> websites -
>> that atheism is this, that or the other, it is immoral and therefore
>> evil.
>> He is also here to state religious conviction. He will not, nor can
>> he,
>> enter into any meaningful discourse. The regulars here are aware of
>> it and
>> post along the same lines as this post from time to time. Newbies
>> and
>> passers by just drop right into the trap....
>>
>> At the risk of boring you and others here to death, dilv is incapable
>> of
>> intellectual reasoning, he is an evangelical cyber foot soldier that
>> has
>> been pyschologically pre-programmed to maintain the devout message
>> and has
>> nothing remotely interesting or intellectually challenging to add to
>> expecwell
>> trodden religious dogmatic paths.
>> If you really wish an atheist vs relgious discussion come on over to
>> UKRC
>> where the discussion, whilst no less frustrating, is light years
>> ahead of
>> the dilv dribble.
>
> REPLY: Should be pretty obvious that Ken being 'an atheist' isnt
> able to defend his position and so must resort to defamation and use
> of foul language.
I see none of either: I see blatant fact, honesty, and a good description of
a *troll* known as DiLV.
> One would not expect this from a Professional
> Retired Chemist . He talks more like a BUCK-NEVVIE ! (Ken wont
> know what this british term means..)
Neither do I (Lifelong Brit.); and neither does Google for that matter: More
fantasy from Dimwit Dave.
--
http://www.kustomkomputa.co.uk
Personalised Desktop Computers
date: Sat, 10 May 2008 03:21:17 +0100
author: Dr.Hal0nf1r?$ lid
|
Re: Time 4 another DILV ignore this troll announcement
X-No-Archive: yes
"Dr.Hal0nf1r£$" <femail@nospam.kustomkomputa.co.uk.invalid> wrote in message
news:OuWdnUC43rQBm7jVnZ2dnUVZ8sTinZ2d@bt.com...
> IlBeBauck@gmail.com wrote:
>> One would not expect this from a Professional
>> Retired Chemist . He talks more like a BUCK-NEVVIE ! (Ken wont
>> know what this british term means..)
> Neither do I (Lifelong Brit.); and neither does Google for that matter:
> More fantasy from Dimwit Dave.
I've never heard the term either.......(another brit)
Mark
date: Sat, 10 May 2008 08:43:05 +0100
author: mark
|
Re: Time 4 another DILV ignore this troll announcement
In article ,
"Dr.Hal0nf1r£$" <femail@nospam.kustomkomputa.co.uk.invalid> wrote:
>
> > One would not expect this from a Professional
> > Retired Chemist . He talks more like a BUCK-NEVVIE ! (Ken wont
> > know what this british term means..)
>
> Neither do I (Lifelong Brit.); and neither does Google for that matter: More
> fantasy from Dimwit Dave.
I think it's an Irish term, with 'navvy' rather than *nevvie. The
following examples should give you an idea.
'Dating from 1923, this is the hard and gritty story of Moleskin Joe, a
buck navvy who tramped the roads of Britain, looking for work.'
<http://www.moleskinerie.com/2004/09/moleskine_the_b.html>
'Come all you true born Irishmen and listen to my song.
I am a bold buck navvy and I don't know right from wrong.
Of late I've been transported from Erin's holy shore;
My case is sad; my crime is bad, for I was born poor.'
<http://www.christymoore.com/lyrics_tabs_detail.php?id=221>
<http://www.movinghere.org.uk/galleries/histories/irish/settling/settling
.htm>
date: Sat, 10 May 2008 10:02:59 +0100
author: Alwyn
|
Re: Time 4 another DILV ignore this troll announcement
On Sat, 10 May 2008 10:02:59 +0100, Alwyn wrote:
>In article ,
> "Dr.Hal0nf1r£$" <femail@nospam.kustomkomputa.co.uk.invalid> wrote:
>>
>> > One would not expect this from a Professional
>> > Retired Chemist . He talks more like a BUCK-NEVVIE ! (Ken wont
>> > know what this british term means..)
>>
>> Neither do I (Lifelong Brit.); and neither does Google for that matter: More
>> fantasy from Dimwit Dave.
>
>I think it's an Irish term, with 'navvy' rather than *nevvie. The
>following examples should give you an idea.
>
>'Dating from 1923, this is the hard and gritty story of Moleskin Joe, a
>buck navvy who tramped the roads of Britain, looking for work.'
><http://www.moleskinerie.com/2004/09/moleskine_the_b.html>
>
>'Come all you true born Irishmen and listen to my song.
>I am a bold buck navvy and I don't know right from wrong.
>Of late I've been transported from Erin's holy shore;
>My case is sad; my crime is bad, for I was born poor.'
><http://www.christymoore.com/lyrics_tabs_detail.php?id=221>
><http://www.movinghere.org.uk/galleries/histories/irish/settling/settling
>.htm>
"Navvie" is English slang for unskilled labourer.
The original navvies were the (often Irish) labourers who dug the
canals. A "navigation" was a river turned into a canal by widening,
straight links instead of meandering etc,
When the railways were built the construction labourers were also
called navvies.
Eventually it became used for any unskilled heavy manual labour.
date: Sat, 10 May 2008 10:54:36 -0400
author: Christopher A. Lee
|
Re: Time 4 another DILV ignore this troll announcement
On May 10, 7:54 am, Christopher A. Lee wrote:
> On Sat, 10 May 2008 10:02:59 퍝, Alwyn wrote:
> >In article ,
> > "Dr.Hal0nf1r£$" <fem...@nospam.kustomkomputa.co.uk.invalid> wrote:
>
> >> > One would not expect this from a Professional
> >> > Retired Chemist . He talks more like a BUCK-NEVVIE ! (Ken wont
> >> > know what this british term means..)
>
> >> Neither do I (Lifelong Brit.); and neither does Google for that matter: More
> >> fantasy from Dimwit Dave.
>
> >I think it's an Irish term, with 'navvy' rather than *nevvie. The
> >following examples should give you an idea.
>
> >'Dating from 1923, this is the hard and gritty story of Moleskin Joe, a
> >buck navvy who tramped the roads of Britain, looking for work.'
> ><http://www.moleskinerie.com/2004/09/moleskine_the_b.html>
>
> >'Come all you true born Irishmen and listen to my song.
> >I am a bold buck navvy and I don't know right from wrong.
> >Of late I've been transported from Erin's holy shore;
> >My case is sad; my crime is bad, for I was born poor.'
> ><http://www.christymoore.com/lyrics_tabs_detail.php?id=221>
> ><http://www.movinghere.org.uk/galleries/histories/irish/settling/settling> >.htm>
>
> "Navvie" is English slang for unskilled labourer.
>
> The original navvies were the (often Irish) labourers who dug the
> canals. A "navigation" was a river turned into a canal by widening,
> straight links instead of meandering etc,
>
> When the railways were built the construction labourers were also
> called navvies.
>
> Eventually it became used for any unskilled heavy manual labour.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Well as I have standard 4 year degree, an advanced degree, plus a
technical degree and considering the source.... a brainwashed poorly
educated fat assed fundy who can't spell, puncutuate, design a
complete sentence, or follow generally accepted rules for
capilization.......who gives a fuck what he thinks of me
date: Sat, 10 May 2008 08:23:04 -0700 (PDT)
author: Ken
|
Re: Time 4 another DILV ignore this troll announcement
In article ,
Christopher A. Lee wrote:
>
> "Navvie" is English slang for unskilled labourer.
But rather dated, I would have thought. However, 'buck navvie' is new to
me, and I thought it might be Irish.
> The original navvies were the (often Irish) labourers who dug the
> canals. A "navigation" was a river turned into a canal by widening,
> straight links instead of meandering etc,
>
> When the railways were built the construction labourers were also
> called navvies.
>
> Eventually it became used for any unskilled heavy manual labour.
There is a good Wikipedia article on the subject:
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navvy>
date: Sat, 10 May 2008 21:30:39 +0100
author: Alwyn
|
Re: Time 4 another DILV ignore this troll announcement
On May 9, 7:21 pm, "Dr.Hal0nf1r£$"
<fem...@nospam.kustomkomputa.co.uk.invalid> wrote:
REPLY: Should be pretty obvious that Ken being 'an atheist' isnt
> > able to defend his position and so must resort to defamation and use
> > of foul language.
I see blatant fact, honesty, and a good description of a *troll* known
as DiLV.
> --http://www.kustomkomputa.co.uk
> Personalised Desktop Computers
Looks as accurate as it could be with respect to DILV, coming from
three different sources.
There's no "position" to defend as most, if not all, in here would
agree with it
There's no deflamation in revealing facts and truths that's openly
evident to everyone
And he apparently relishes in being labeled a fundy asshole, and
that's hardly 'fowl language"
Sandy
date: Sat, 10 May 2008 13:58:36 -0700 (PDT)
author: sandi
|
|
|