Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
misc
announce
answers
consultants
d-i-y
environment
environment.conservation
gov.agency.csa
gov.local
gov.social-security
gov.social-work
misc
philosophy.atheism
philosophy.humanism
philosophy.misc
radio.amateur
railway
sci.astronomy
sci.med.nursing
sci.med.pharmacy
sci.misc
sci.weather
singles
telecom
telecom.broadband
telecom.mobile
telecom.voip
test
transport
transport.air
transport.buses
transport.ferry
transport.london
transport.ride-sharing
  
 
date: Thu, 1 May 2008 12:49:18 -0700 (PDT),    group: uk.philosophy.atheism        back       
Science Disproves Evolution   
Expansion: Big Bang or Stretching? 4

Central Stars. About forty stars are orbiting within a few dozen light-
hours of the black hole at the center of our Milky Way Galaxy. Those
stars could never have evolved that close to a black hole, which has
the mass of 4,000,000 suns. The black hole’s gravity would have
prevented gas from collapsing to become a star (7). However, those
stars could have formed in a much denser environment (8), before space
was stretched out during the creation week.

7.	“The black hole’s inactivity [today] suggests that the central few
light years doesn’t contain enough raw material to make stars. And the
enormous gravitational tidal forces around the black hole would seem
to prohibit stars from forming even if the material were there: it’s
hard for a cloud of gas to contract into a star under its own gravity
when something that weighs as much as four million stars is sitting
next door.” Jeff Kanipe, “A Long Time Ago, in a Galaxy Not So Far
Away,” Nature, Vol. 446, 5 April 2007, p. 601.

8.	“In principle, this could have occurred if the density of the gases
in the centre of the Galaxy was much higher in the past. Higher
density would allow clumps in the clouds to collapse to form stars,
even in the presence of a strong gravitational field [of a black
hole].” Ibid., p. 602.

http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/FAQ19.html
date: Thu, 1 May 2008 12:49:18 -0700 (PDT)   author:   unknown

Re: Creationism is BULLCRAP   
The only time creationism and science should EVER be used in the
same sentence is when the words "is not" has been inserted between
them
date: Thu, 1 May 2008 14:42:07 -0700 (PDT)   author:   Ken

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us