Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
misc
announce
answers
consultants
d-i-y
environment
environment.conservation
gov.agency.csa
gov.local
gov.social-security
gov.social-work
misc
philosophy.atheism
philosophy.humanism
philosophy.misc
radio.amateur
railway
sci.astronomy
sci.med.nursing
sci.med.pharmacy
sci.misc
sci.weather
singles
telecom
telecom.broadband
telecom.mobile
telecom.voip
test
transport
transport.air
transport.buses
transport.ferry
transport.london
transport.ride-sharing
  
 
date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:30:30 -0700 (PDT),    group: uk.philosophy.atheism        back       
Science Disproves Evolution   
Expansion: Big Bang or Stretching? 2

Comparison of Two Explanations for Expansion of the Universe

The universe was once much smaller. It began soon after time began and
before the laws of physics came into operation (2). Energy and matter
appeared out of nothing.
[Big Bang	Yes]
[Stretching	Yes]

Expansion began at almost a mathematical point.
[Big Bang	Yes (3)]
[Stretching	No]

Expansion energy came from within the universe.
[Big Bang	Yes]
[Stretching	No]

The initial temperature and density of matter was:
[Big Bang	nearly infinite]
[Stretching	finite]

The expansion:
[Big Bang	continues today]
[Stretching	was a brief event]

All expansion energy was expended:
[Big Bang	within a tiny fraction (10^34) of a second]
[Stretching	as the expansion proceeded]

Stars, galaxies, and black holes began forming:
[Big Bang	after hundreds of millions of years, in an expanded
universe]
[Stretching	before the expansion]

2.	Andrei Linde, “The Self-Reproducing Inflationary Universe,”
Scientific American, Vol. 271, November 1994, p. 48.

3.	“According to inflationary cosmology, the universe [began] growing
from a patch as small as 10-26 m, one hundred billion times smaller
than a proton, ...” Alan H. Guth and David I. Kaiser, “Inflationary
Cosmology: Exploring the Universe from the Smallest to the Largest
Scales,” Science, Vol. 307, 11 February 2005, p. 885.

http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/FAQ19.html
date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:30:30 -0700 (PDT)   author:   unknown

Re: Creationism is BULLCRAP   
The only time creationism and science should EVER be used in the
same sentence is when the words "is not" has been inserted between
them
date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:03:54 -0700 (PDT)   author:   Ken

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us