|
|
|
date: 23 Jan 2008 16:27:15 GMT,
group: uk.philosophy.atheism
back
Re: Can someone confirm if this is how Atheists were made ?
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 07:45:42 -0600, Dave in Lake Villa wrote:
> 'If your 'god' had not made so many accidental mistakes when
> transcribing your creation myth you would not be needing to write this
> garbage.'
>
> REPLY: He doesnt make mistakes and your not an accident ; if you
> wouldnt force yourself to believe your great ancestor was slimey algae
> so you could live as you like , then i wouldnt have the need to write
> the original post.
Hi, everyone. I've been hanging around for a while, having a good read of
the posts. Very interesting. I am now intrigued and just had to ask Dave
in Lake Villa: What is the 'not an accident' that the poster to whom you
are replying possesses? This 'not an accident' seems to be something that
'He' doesn't make. However, if I am correct, the 'He' to which you refer
seems to be a supreme being, a being that, you believe, is responsible
for everything in the universe. If so, then surely you believe that 'He'
must have made this 'not an accident'. I must admit to being confused by
your meaning.
It's just that I understood this to be a philosophy of atheism newsgroup
and I like to be sure that I understand the content of every message.
It's important to be precise when communicating, don't you think?
Best regards.
date: 23 Jan 2008 16:27:15 GMT
author: Roger Ivan Hart
|
Re: Can someone confirm if this is how Atheists were made ?
'Hi, everyone. I've been hanging around for a while, having a good read
of the posts. Very interesting. I am now intrigued and just had to ask
Dave in Lake Villa: What is the 'not an accident' that the poster to
whom you are replying possesses? This 'not an accident' seems to be
something that 'He' doesn't make. However, if I am correct, the 'He' to
which you refer seems to be a supreme being, a being that, you believe,
is responsible for everything in the universe. If so, then surely you
believe that 'He' must have made this 'not an accident'. I must admit to
being confused by your meaning.
It's just that I understood this to be a philosophy of atheism newsgroup
and I like to be sure that I understand the content of every message.
It's important to be precise when communicating, don't you think?
Best regards. '
REPLY: Hello. Yes i think clarification is a valid issue. Please start
a new thread with a new title and Ill respond in kind. Regards and
welcome.
date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 09:10:41 -0600
author: (Dave in Lake Villa)
|
|
|