'Well dave... that's about it then isn't it... What you must now know
that all who have been here and read these threads are absolutely sure,
along with me, that you have not offered one iota of evidence for the
monumental assertions you have made. It follows that without the
evidence from you, your statements are deemed not to be true or
correct.'

REPLY:  Actually Mark,  since you are a relative newbie to this NG, you
only think i havent offered evidence in this NG. If you do a bit of
research, youll find i have offered all the evidence one would need to
accept a Theistic Creator , and,  to leave atheism because it is untrue
and cannot even be lived out truthfully in ones personal life.

The message 
from DaveInLakeVilla@webtv.net (Dave in Lake Villa) contains these words:

> REPLY:  Actually Mark,  since you are a relative newbie to this NG, you
> only think i havent offered evidence in this NG. If you do a bit of
> research, youll find i have offered all the evidence one would need to
> accept a Theistic Creator , and,  to leave atheism because it is untrue
> and cannot even be lived out truthfully in ones personal life.

You have never presented any credible evidence to support your
assertions despite being repeatedly asked to do so.   You can't do so
because there is no credible evidence for the existence of your
imaginary god and you are too scared to admit it.
-- 
**********
David W-G
**********

On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 15:22:13 GMT, David Wynne-Griffiths
 wrote:

>The message 
>from DaveInLakeVilla@webtv.net (Dave in Lake Villa) contains these words:
>
>> REPLY:  Actually Mark,  since you are a relative newbie to this NG, you
>> only think i havent offered evidence in this NG. If you do a bit of
>> research, youll find i have offered all the evidence one would need to
>> accept a Theistic Creator , and,  to leave atheism because it is untrue
>> and cannot even be lived out truthfully in ones personal life.

He's lying through his teeth, and doesn't even fool himself.

>You have never presented any credible evidence to support your
>assertions despite being repeatedly asked to do so.   You can't do so
>because there is no credible evidence for the existence of your
>imaginary god and you are too scared to admit it.

He's in denial.

He believes. 

Therefore there is evidence because if there weren't he wouldn't
believe, right?

But he doesn't need it because he already believes.