Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
misc
announce
answers
consultants
d-i-y
environment
environment.conservation
gov.agency.csa
gov.local
gov.social-security
gov.social-work
misc
philosophy.atheism
philosophy.humanism
philosophy.misc
radio.amateur
railway
sci.astronomy
sci.med.nursing
sci.med.pharmacy
sci.misc
sci.weather
singles
telecom
telecom.broadband
telecom.mobile
telecom.voip
test
transport
transport.air
transport.buses
transport.ferry
transport.london
transport.ride-sharing
  
 
date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 19:13:04 +0100,    group: uk.misc        back       
Re: Old Nag dumped on train platform.   
On Thu, 7 Aug 2008 14:16:57 +0100, Hot Badger Deluxe
 wrote:

>On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:13:29 +0100, judith wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 7 Aug 2008 12:44:26 +0100, Hot Badger Deluxe
>>  wrote:
>> 
>>>On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 12:27:49 +0100, mummy wrote:
>>>
>>><snip>
>>>
>>>> Perhaps you can advise on now Bus Stations - my local Bus Station has
>>>> a sign which says  "Smoking is not allowed in this bus station".
>>>> 
>>>> Now with your fine legal mind - would I be breaking the law if I were
>>>> to smoke in the open air in that bus-station?  Does this sign have any
>>>> legal standing whatsoever?
>>>
>>>It's private property.
>> 
>> So you don't know the answer to the question I asked.
>
>Strawman.
>
>> (Railways are also private property - so what?)
>
>So the owner can decide what is allowed on their property.

but not what is legal or otherwise - thanks for your minimal
contribution.
date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 19:13:04 +0100   author:   judith

Re: Old Nag dumped on train platform.   
On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 19:13:04 +0100, judith wrote:

<snip>

> thanks for your minimal contribution.

Oh look - an insult. I think we know what that means, don't we children.

Bye bye.


-- 
A faith that cannot survive collision with 
the truth is not worth many regrets.
date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 20:25:47 +0100   author:   Hot Badger Deluxe

Re: Old Nag dumped on train platform.   
On Thu, 7 Aug 2008 20:25:47 +0100, Hot Badger Deluxe
 wrote:

>On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 19:13:04 +0100, judith wrote:
>
><snip>
>
>> thanks for your minimal contribution.
>
>Oh look - an insult. I think we know what that means, don't we children.
>
>Bye bye.

Here's some others  I read earlier:
How sweet.
More likely crayon drawings.
So, no answer at all then. That's what I thought.
You made the claim - back it up, or
fuck off.


can't remember who said them.

Bye, bye
date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 21:26:32 +0100   author:   judith

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us