Not too exciting, but anyway...

Any miscreants in need of a camera lens 58mm to 55mm step-down ring?  I
have two spare, as I ordered two recently, and they sent me four. And
I've been told just to keep the extra ones as it'd cost more than
they're worth to return them.

Email gets 'em.

-- 
so hard to find my way

On 2008-07-16, August West  wrote:
>
> Not too exciting, but anyway...
>
> Any miscreants in need of a camera lens 58mm to 55mm step-down ring?  I
> have two spare, as I ordered two recently, and they sent me four. And
> I've been told just to keep the extra ones as it'd cost more than
> they're worth to return them.
>
> Email gets 'em.

YHM.


-- 
          "Be thankful that you have a life, and forsake your vain
                 and presumptuous desire for a second one."
               [email me at huge {at} huge (dot) org <dot> uk]

Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> writes:

> On 2008-07-16, August West  wrote:
>>
>> Not too exciting, but anyway...
>>
>> Any miscreants in need of a camera lens 58mm to 55mm step-down ring?  I
>> have two spare, as I ordered two recently, and they sent me four. And
>> I've been told just to keep the extra ones as it'd cost more than
>> they're worth to return them.
>>
>> Email gets 'em.
>
> YHM.

No, I don't:

Jul 17 12:26:49 adelie postfix/smtpd[7414]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
mk-filter-3-a-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com[212.XX.XXX.XX]: 550 5.7.1
: Recipient address rejected: Please see
http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=helo&id=mk-filter-3-a-4.mail.uk.tiscali.com&ip=212.74.100.54&r=adelie;
from=<huge@nowhere.much.invalid> to= proto=ESMTP
helo=<mk-filter-3-a-4.mail.uk.tiscali.com>

-- 
I thought I was someone else

On 2008-07-17, August West  wrote:
> Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> writes:
>
>> On 2008-07-16, August West  wrote:
>>>
>>> Not too exciting, but anyway...
>>>
>>> Any miscreants in need of a camera lens 58mm to 55mm step-down ring?  I
>>> have two spare, as I ordered two recently, and they sent me four. And
>>> I've been told just to keep the extra ones as it'd cost more than
>>> they're worth to return them.
>>>
>>> Email gets 'em.
>>
>> YHM.
>
> No, I don't:
>
> Jul 17 12:26:49 adelie postfix/smtpd[7414]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
> mk-filter-3-a-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com[212.XX.XXX.XX]: 550 5.7.1
>: Recipient address rejected: Please see
> http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=helo&id=mk-filter-3-a-4.mail.uk.tiscali.com&ip=212.74.100.54&r=adelie;
> from=<huge@nowhere.much.invalid> 

That's jolly weird. Wonder why that happened? It shouldn't.



-- 
          "Be thankful that you have a life, and forsake your vain
                 and presumptuous desire for a second one."
               [email me at huge {at} huge (dot) org <dot> uk]

Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> writes:

> On 2008-07-17, August West  wrote:
>> Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> writes:
>>
>>> On 2008-07-16, August West  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Not too exciting, but anyway...
>>>>
>>>> Any miscreants in need of a camera lens 58mm to 55mm step-down ring?  I
>>>> have two spare, as I ordered two recently, and they sent me four. And
>>>> I've been told just to keep the extra ones as it'd cost more than
>>>> they're worth to return them.
>>>>
>>>> Email gets 'em.
>>>
>>> YHM.
>>
>> No, I don't:
>>
>> Jul 17 12:26:49 adelie postfix/smtpd[7414]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
>> mk-filter-3-a-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com[212.XX.XXX.XX]: 550 5.7.1
>>: Recipient address rejected: Please see
>> http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=helo&id=mk-filter-3-a-4.mail.uk.tiscali.com&ip=212.74.100.54&r=adelie;
>> from=<huge@nowhere.much.invalid> 
>
> That's jolly weird. Wonder why that happened? It shouldn't.

Becuase Tiscali have SPF set up, but not correctly:

adelie rejected a message from a mail server claiming to be
mk-filter-3-a-4.mail.uk.tiscali.com.

adelie received a message from mk-filter-3-a-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com
(212.74.100.54) from a mail server claiming to be
mk-filter-3-a-4.mail.uk.tiscali.com.

However, the domain mk-filter-3-a-4.mail.uk.tiscali.com has declared
using SPF that it does not send mail through
mk-filter-3-a-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com (212.74.100.54). That is why the
message was rejected.

Anyway, other email recived, and ring on its way.

-- 
sharp as a sack of wet mice

On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:17:34 +0100, August West wrote:

> Anyway, other email recived, and ring on its way.

Get a room!

-- 
One way ticket from Mornington Crescent to Tannhauser Gate please.

On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:17:34 +0100, August West wrote:

<snip>

> ring on its way.

"They exchanged rings - a messy procedure".


-- 
We're with the department of agriculture.

August West  wrote:

> 
> Anyway, other email recived, and ring on its way.

OFFICIAL NEWS +++ BREAKING +++ LATEST

August and Huge engaged!

On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:40:41 +0100, Steve Firth wrote:

<snip>

> August and Huge engaged!

Now that's not an image I wanted.


-- 
I thought I wanted a career 
turns out I just wanted paychecks.

Hot Badger Deluxe  writes:

> On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:40:41 +0100, Steve Firth wrote:
>
>> August and Huge engaged!
>
> Now that's not an image I wanted.

Nah, Pidge is my bitch.

-- 
distasteful, and arguably perverted

"August West"  wrote

>>> August and Huge engaged!
>>
>> Now that's not an image I wanted.
>
> Nah, Pidge is my bitch.

And do you pay any attention to me?

Heartless bastard.

"Nine Cuts"  writes:

> "August West"  wrote
>
>>>> August and Huge engaged!
>>>
>>> Now that's not an image I wanted.
>>
>> Nah, Pidge is my bitch.
>
> And do you pay any attention to me?

Shut it, slaag.

> Heartless bastard.

On yer knees, bitch!

-- 
sharp as a sack of wet mice

On 2008-07-17, August West  wrote:
> Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> writes:
>
>> On 2008-07-17, August West  wrote:
>>> Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> writes:
>>>
>>>> On 2008-07-16, August West  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Not too exciting, but anyway...
>>>>>
>>>>> Any miscreants in need of a camera lens 58mm to 55mm step-down ring?  I
>>>>> have two spare, as I ordered two recently, and they sent me four. And
>>>>> I've been told just to keep the extra ones as it'd cost more than
>>>>> they're worth to return them.
>>>>>
>>>>> Email gets 'em.
>>>>
>>>> YHM.
>>>
>>> No, I don't:
>>>
>>> Jul 17 12:26:49 adelie postfix/smtpd[7414]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
>>> mk-filter-3-a-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com[212.XX.XXX.XX]: 550 5.7.1
>>>: Recipient address rejected: Please see
>>> http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=helo&id=mk-filter-3-a-4.mail.uk.tiscali.com&ip=212.74.100.54&r=adelie;
>>> from=<huge@nowhere.much.invalid> 
>>
>> That's jolly weird. Wonder why that happened? It shouldn't.
>
> Becuase Tiscali have SPF set up, but not correctly:

Well, that doesn't surprise me, but that isn't what I meant. The "From:" address
is wrong.

> Anyway, other email recived, and ring on its way.

Thanks muchly.


-- 
          "Be thankful that you have a life, and forsake your vain
                 and presumptuous desire for a second one."
               [email me at huge {at} huge (dot) org <dot> uk]

Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> writes:

> On 2008-07-17, August West  wrote:
>> Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> writes:
>>
>> Becuase Tiscali have SPF set up, but not correctly:
>
> Well, that doesn't surprise me, but that isn't what I meant. The
> "From:" address is wrong.

Oh, right; I changed that, for Privacy Pospoises.

-- 
Let me jump to my own conclusions

On 2008-07-18, August West  wrote:
> Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> writes:
>
>> On 2008-07-17, August West  wrote:
>>> Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> writes:
>>>
>>> Becuase Tiscali have SPF set up, but not correctly:
>>
>> Well, that doesn't surprise me, but that isn't what I meant. The
>> "From:" address is wrong.
>
> Oh, right; I changed that, for Privacy Pospoises.

Ah, thanks. That only occured to me too late to do anything about it.


-- 
          "Be thankful that you have a life, and forsake your vain
                 and presumptuous desire for a second one."
               [email me at huge {at} huge (dot) org <dot> uk]