Okay. Hold onto your principles and prepare for a shock. As I
suspected Jim Follett was telling the truth when he said that he did
not write his Wiki entry. It may have been written by a well-known
Wikipedian M Lee (talk). Jim Follett was also telling truth when he
said that he corrected errors on several occasions.

Wikipedia have also confirmed that the copyright infringement of Jim
Follett's work (I don't have the full details of what the infringment
was) was removed at the request of a publisher's lawyer without any
reference to Jim Follett, without his knowledge,  and without any
history of the removal appearing on Wiki. So much for the wild claims
that have appeared on uk.misc about Wiki not being responisible for
entries, not assuming responisibility for them, not modifying them,
and not accepting legal culcability for the content of their
publication. Seems that they do all three.

Also Jim Follett did not write the Wiki 'Earthsearch' entry. In fact
he didn't even know it existed until I told him. He's made a tiny
correction to it which ought to send Steve, JAF and other leaders of
the uk.misc lie machine into a feeding frenzy.

Cross post set to demon.local because I think he reads there, or did.
He's not answering emails at the moment so he could be away.

Cheers

R Christopher

richardrnib@googlemail.com wrote:
< Jim Follett >

> He's not answering emails at the moment so he could be away.

Brilliant!

Do you reckon he answers the door wearing a false moustache, saying "no, 
Jim can't come out to play today"?

On Fri, 04 Jul 2008 02:13:54 -0700, richardrnib@googlemail.com wrote:

> Okay. Hold onto your principles and prepare for a shock. As I
> suspected Jim Follett was telling the truth when he said that he did
> not write his Wiki entry. It may have been written by a well-known
> Wikipedian M Lee (talk). Jim Follett was also telling truth when he
> said that he corrected errors on several occasions.

What "he" couldn't quite bring himself to admit was that he had *edited*
the Wikipedia entry.  Nobody ever said that he wrote the original.  But
when somebody pointed out that he had edited it, he started blethering 
on about "writing to the editors".

> Cross post set to demon.local because I think he reads there, or did.
> He's not answering emails at the moment so he could be away.

<eurovision>
Hello demon.local!  uk.misc here!  Are you ready?  Your marks please 
for the "richardrnib" entry in SockPuppet 2008!
</eurovision>

-- 
One way ticket from Mornington Crescent to Tannhauser Gate please.

On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 02:13:54 -0700 (PDT), "richardrnib@googlemail.com"
 wrote:

>Jim Follett was also telling truth when he
>said that he corrected errors on several occasions.

So, he *did* edit it.


>Also Jim Follett did not write the Wiki 'Earthsearch' entry. 

Nobody said that he did.

>In fact
>he didn't even know it existed until I told him. He's made a tiny
>correction to it which ought to send Steve, JAF and other leaders of
>the uk.misc lie machine into a feeding frenzy.

So, he *did* edit it.

Thanks for confirming what we've been saying all along.


-- 
JAF anarchatntlworldfullstopcom
     Sapere Aude

"JAF"  wrote in message 
news:832s641rve1416obhkatjodgf4kq27jdqp@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 02:13:54 -0700 (PDT), "richardrnib@googlemail.com"
>  wrote:
>
>>Jim Follett was also telling truth when he
>>said that he corrected errors on several occasions.
>
> So, he *did* edit it.
>
Never let the truth get in the way of...... ?


-- 
Chris
Ignoti nulla cupido

On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 08:39:40 -0400, Cerumen wrote:

> "JAF"  wrote in message 
> news:832s641rve1416obhkatjodgf4kq27jdqp@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 02:13:54 -0700 (PDT), "richardrnib@googlemail.com"
>>  wrote:
>>
>>>Jim Follett was also telling truth when he
>>>said that he corrected errors on several occasions.
>>
>> So, he *did* edit it.
>>
> Never let the truth get in the way of...... ?

Barry?


-- 
I'm holding in my hands a small box of chocolate bunnies

In article <e3a4c22e-43dc-4d2b-8677-da3cf02741c3
@x35g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>, richardrnib@googlemail.com says...
> Okay. Hold onto your principles and prepare for a shock. As I
> suspected Jim Follett was telling the truth when he said that he did
> not write his Wiki entry. It may have been written by a well-known
> Wikipedian M Lee (talk). Jim Follett was also telling truth when he
> said that he corrected errors on several occasions.

Nobody said JF wrote the wiki entry. JF denied correcting entries. Do 
TRY to keep up at the back there.

On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 14:55:27 +0100, Amethyst Deceiver wrote:

> Do TRY to keep up at the back there.

Fnarr.


-- 
The perfect anti-speeding advert would be Richard Hammond 
trying to remember his own wedding.

In article <22nbk.20600$E41.19655@text.news.virginmedia.com>, 
fevric@invalid.invalid says...
> <eurovision>
> Hello demon.local!  uk.misc here!  Are you ready?  Your marks please 
> for the "richardrnib" entry in SockPuppet 2008!
> </eurovision>

Ullo....

When the (annual?) WDUKMTC going to start?

For those who don't recall this acronym, it stands for,

"Wholly Discredited UK Misc Trolling Competition"

:-) 

-- 
Neil Barker

"Neil Barker"  wrote in message 
news:MPG.22d8615b210968a0989b85@127.0.0.1...
> In article <22nbk.20600$E41.19655@text.news.virginmedia.com>,
> fevric@invalid.invalid says...
>> <eurovision>
>> Hello demon.local!  uk.misc here!  Are you ready?  Your marks please
>> for the "richardrnib" entry in SockPuppet 2008!
>> </eurovision>
>
> Ullo....
>
> When the (annual?) WDUKMTC going to start?
>
> For those who don't recall this acronym, it stands for,
>
> "Wholly Discredited UK Misc Trolling Competition"
>
> :-)
>
> -- 
> Neil Barker

Fuck Off, Neil.

-- 
Tobias

"When I built and setup Allison's computer last year, as bits and pieces
were arriving sporadically and time was pressing before the Bibury meet,
I used an older 'test-bed' machine of mine to setup the system and then
clone it onto her machine when it was all ready to accept it. Everything
was setup correctly - this also included setting a POP3 password so that
she would be able to receive mail should there be problems with
mailkicks via SMTP, or should she wish to choose this method. I do also
recall explaining this and indeed asking her what password she'd like
for this - something I've now long since forgot.
Towards the middle of January this year my hairdresser, Richard, asked
for my help in sorting his Internet stuff out on his computer, having a
problem with his email. I can recall quite vividly how I was on the
phone to him late one night asking him for his details to enter into
Outlook (also setup on the same test-bed used above, when my bleeper
went off. I had to therefore end that call there and then and upon
checking found I'd got an RTA to go to in the middle of nowhere.

Returning from that later on, said test-bed machine was on-line, having
automatically connected to my account via a timed connection. Whilst
online, Outlook had also 'kindly' checked for email - using the details
for Allison's machine which I'd forgotten were still setup (When setting
her machine up, I did toy with the idea of giving her another choice as
well as Tripnuke - you will know my 'hatred' of large buttons....).

That, is how a couple of emails came to be inadvertently downloaded
here."

- Neil Barker explaining in d.l just how he managed to happen
across emails belonging to someone else. (He never managed to
explain how he happened to forward them same emails to his
partner-in-crime John Kaye.)

wrote in message 
news:e3a4c22e-43dc-4d2b-8677-da3cf02741c3@x35g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> Okay. Hold onto your principles and prepare for a shock. As I
> suspected Jim Follett was telling the truth when he said that he did
> not write his Wiki entry. It may have been written by a well-known
> Wikipedian M Lee (talk). Jim Follett was also telling truth when he
> said that he corrected errors on several occasions.
>
> Wikipedia have also confirmed that the copyright infringement of Jim
> Follett's work (I don't have the full details of what the infringment
> was) was removed at the request of a publisher's lawyer without any
> reference to Jim Follett, without his knowledge,  and without any
> history of the removal appearing on Wiki. So much for the wild claims
> that have appeared on uk.misc about Wiki not being responisible for
> entries, not assuming responisibility for them, not modifying them,
> and not accepting legal culcability for the content of their
> publication. Seems that they do all three.
>
> Also Jim Follett did not write the Wiki 'Earthsearch' entry. In fact
> he didn't even know it existed until I told him. He's made a tiny
> correction to it which ought to send Steve, JAF and other leaders of
> the uk.misc lie machine into a feeding frenzy.
>
> Cross post set to demon.local because I think he reads there, or did.
> He's not answering emails at the moment so he could be away.
>
> Cheers
>
> R Christopher

Aarrrgh, Fuck Off, Squire Follett. It do look like that apoplexy attack 
really did short circuit your memory 'cos your Blind Richard sock was 
exposed last year when he was still using the Redhill address long after it 
closed down. You weren't to know though, were you, Jimbo, 'cos you lost 
track of everything following your apoplectic fit.

Do try harder, Follett.

-- 
Cap'n Tobias Bridge

"I've now had a chance to read the appropriate section in Mr Follett's
draft Tavvie paper on hate. I've been asked to referee some parts of
the paper on group dynamics and have decided to volunteer a few
comments on the interesting behaviour of his Easynews stalker. I've
submitted my findings to Mr Follett. As soon as I have his permission
to reproduce my comments I'll be pleased to do so  on some Usenet
newsgroups where regular contributors may be puzzled by the stalker's
seeming compulsive obsession with Mr. Follett and , to a lesser extent
with Mr. Dave Pepper -- a frequent contributor to the surrey newsgroup
in the uk hierachy."
- Richard Christopher. RNIB Redhill. Posting to Usenet since 1997.

"Arrrrgh, Jim, lad, ye be too set in your ways to try and hide your posting 
style now." - Tobias B

"Fevric J Glandules" <fevric@invalid.invalid> wrote in message 
news:22nbk.20600$E41.19655@text.news.virginmedia.com...
> On Fri, 04 Jul 2008 02:13:54 -0700, richardrnib@googlemail.com wrote:
>
>> Okay. Hold onto your principles and prepare for a shock. As I
>> suspected Jim Follett was telling the truth when he said that he did
>> not write his Wiki entry. It may have been written by a well-known
>> Wikipedian M Lee (talk). Jim Follett was also telling truth when he
>> said that he corrected errors on several occasions.
>
> What "he" couldn't quite bring himself to admit was that he had *edited*
> the Wikipedia entry.  Nobody ever said that he wrote the original.  But
> when somebody pointed out that he had edited it, he started blethering
> on about "writing to the editors".
>
>> Cross post set to demon.local because I think he reads there, or did.
>> He's not answering emails at the moment so he could be away.
>
> <eurovision>
> Hello demon.local!  uk.misc here!  Are you ready?  Your marks please
> for the "richardrnib" entry in SockPuppet 2008!
> </eurovision>
>

Aarrrgh, this Blind Richard fellow keeps a-poppin' out o' Squire Follett's 
sock drawer every time Follet thinks his arguments (lies) need a bit of 
support. They have quite an interesting history between 'em, popping up in 
all sorts of newsgroups over the years, never ever to post a single thing on 
topic, but just to reprimand assorted long time posters for failing to post 
in the standard according to Follett.

He blew it last year with his Blind Richard sock but I expect he forgot 
about that following his stroke. With a bit o' luck his next fit will see 
him off. Meantime - null pointes!

Some posts to Follett/Richards:

"James, nice try with the intellectual intimidation and although I respect 
the extensive knowledge you often display in this group, your presentation 
and netiquette SUCK! The guy has a point. you may be clever but that doesn't 
give you the right to be a biggoted, know-it-all ASSHOLE like Andy Luckman 
is."

"This type of post is exaclty what makes you so damned popular! May I ask 
how you cope with life as an after birth?"

"'From This Newsgroup:
"

"James, i have a question for you. Why are you using this newsgroup? I have 
looked back through every post for the last month, and you have not 
contributed anything interesting or helpful to this newsgroup, except for 
snide comments about topposting and spelling & grammer."

"Are you as bloody annoying and pedantic a person in life, as you are on 
here, if so then I hope someone kicks your fucking face in one day."

"What I find laughable is that you seem more concerned about top posting 
than about discussion itself. You made a big fuss about one top post."

"Your last paragragh was windy humbug. My argument isn't flimsy either; you 
ARE demonstrably anal and petty regarding usenet posts."

"If you were honest, my dear James, you would know that the above was 
exactly what you were doing: trying to get on the moral highground and give 
a big headmasterly lecture on Usenet duty."

"Down, James, down.  Take deep breaths and think calm thoughts."

"I laughed out loud at your reply JF ,you are trully fucking barking mad."

"God there are some petty, anally retentive cunts in the world- it takes 
something like a top post to bring 'em out. Nothing to say about the very 
serious matter under discussion, natch."

"Maybe my Lord. But I think that petty and anally retentive are about right 
for someone who would always rather comment on top posting and newsreading 
packages than comment on what is actually being said. You'll notice I never 
bothered mention your roaring snobbery--and you never miss a chance to 
indulge that. That was the first time in a bloody long time that I've 
top-posted but you were on it like a rat up a drainpipe, or rather, a 
pedantic sixthformer with blue balls."

"No I'm not: on one occasion I top post you make such a song and dance about 
it--as you do elsewhere--that the pejoratives anal rententive and petty are 
well deserved. It was an error; but there you go making a full scale court 
case out of it, which glaringly advertises a complete lack of proportion in 
these matters."

"Anal-retentive: adjective (of a person) excessively orderly and fussy 
(supposedly owing to conflict over toilet training in infancy). ~ Oxford
English Dictionary - The first part is bang-on in repsect to your Usenet 
behaviour (you bray at grammatical errors and spelling mistakes and then 
blithely commit them yourself."

"It says what it says: I think you are petty and anally retentive about 
newsgroup postings."

"<snip self-aggrandizing whining>"

-- 
Toby

"I've now had a chance to read the appropriate section in Mr Follett's
draft Tavvie paper on hate. I've been asked to referee some parts of
the paper on group dynamics and have decided to volunteer a few
comments on the interesting behaviour of his Easynews stalker. I've
submitted my findings to Mr Follett. As soon as I have his permission
to reproduce my comments I'll be pleased to do so  on some Usenet
newsgroups where regular contributors may be puzzled by the stalker's
seeming compulsive obsession with Mr. Follett and , to a lesser extent
with Mr. Dave Pepper -- a frequent contributor to the surrey newsgroup
in the uk hierachy."
- Richard Christopher. RNIB Redhill. Posting to Usenet since 1997.

"Arrrrgh, Jim, lad, ye be too set in your ways to try and hide your posting 
style now." - Toby B

"Tobias Bridge"  wrote

> Do try harder, Follett.

Oh , please, no.

In article ,
Tobias Bridge  wrote:
>- Neil Barker explaining in d.l [deleted]

Do you think we care?

-- Richard
-- 
Please remember to mention me / in tapes you leave behind.

On Jul 4, 7:35 pm, "Tobias Bridge" 
wrote:

> He blew it last year with his Blind Richard sock but I expect he forgot
> about that following his stroke.

I couldn't think what the dumb cuntwit is whibbling about. Then I
remembered. Last year he was trumpetting about his knowledge of usenet
saying that Follett could not have been posting to usenet 25 years ago
because it didn't exist that long ago. Duh... This from a shaghead who
can't even get the acronym ROFL right! A simple four letter acronym
and he fucks it up!

So a little prank was played on him to see just how stupid he could be
and he didn't let us down. With the help of a friend who undertstands
such things, I sent a usenet post using Follett's Demon IP. For
reasons I don't understand it had to be done with a direct cable
connection and it has to done with Windows XP/SP2. It doesn't work
with Vista. All this was explained to him but he didn't understand.

And for the biggest socket set on usenet to complain about socket sets
is just funny. I'd better not tell him that my flat is owned by the
RNIB. Cerebral overload although he might swallow my telling him that
the rent is collected by men in black helicopters.

In uk.misc,  (richardrnib@googlemail.com) wrote in
::

>Okay. Hold onto your principles and prepare for a shock. As I
>suspected Jim Follett was telling the truth when he said that he did
>not write his Wiki entry. 

As I recall it, no-one said he did.

>It may have been written by a well-known
>Wikipedian M Lee (talk). Jim Follett was also telling truth when he
>said that he corrected errors on several occasions.

Ah.  Except that he claimed to have requested the changes, not made
them.  There *is* a difference.

>Wikipedia have also confirmed that the copyright infringement of Jim
>Follett's work (I don't have the full details of what the infringment
>was) was removed at the request of a publisher's lawyer without any
>reference to Jim Follett, without his knowledge,  and without any
>history of the removal appearing on Wiki. So much for the wild claims
>that have appeared on uk.misc about Wiki not being responisible for
>entries, not assuming responisibility for them, not modifying them,
>and not accepting legal culcability for the content of their
>publication. Seems that they do all three.

Please post the article number where anyone made any of the above
assertions.
>
>Also Jim Follett did not write the Wiki 'Earthsearch' entry. In fact
>he didn't even know it existed until I told him. He's made a tiny
>correction to it which ought to send Steve, JAF and other leaders of
>the uk.misc lie machine into a feeding frenzy.

You're evidently an astute politician, whoever you are: you set up a
series of strawmen based on claims no-one made, and triumphantly refute
them, all the time dodging around the real issue.
-- 
Marc

"We are the Borg. Your life, as it has been, is now over. 
We shall assimilate your cultural, biological, and technological
 distinctiveness into our own. Resistance is futile.
 Do you want fries with that?"

On Fri, 04 Jul 2008 19:05:10 -0700, richardrnib@googlemail.com wrote:

> So a little prank was played on him to see just how stupid he could be
> and he didn't let us down. With the help of a friend who undertstands
> such things, I sent a usenet post using Follett's Demon IP. For
> reasons I don't understand it had to be done with a direct cable
> connection and it has to done with Windows XP/SP2. It doesn't work
> with Vista. All this was explained to him but he didn't understand.

A likely story.

Is the IP address you are using now spoofed as well?

-- 
One way ticket from Mornington Crescent to Tannhauser Gate please.

"Fevric J Glandules" <fevric@invalid.invalid> wrote in message 
news:_YFbk.21012$E41.10235@text.news.virginmedia.com...
> On Fri, 04 Jul 2008 19:05:10 -0700, richardrnib@googlemail.com wrote:
>
>> So a little prank was played on him to see just how stupid he could be
>> and he didn't let us down. With the help of a friend who undertstands
>> such things, I sent a usenet post using Follett's Demon IP. For
>> reasons I don't understand it had to be done with a direct cable
>> connection and it has to done with Windows XP/SP2. It doesn't work
>> with Vista. All this was explained to him but he didn't understand.
>
> A likely story.

IAWTP.

>
> Is the IP address you are using now spoofed as well?
>

ROLF! A Follett post is instantly recognisable by the length and amazing 
detail he goes into wotever he is rabbitting on about and whichever name he 
uses.

-- 
Tobias Bridge

"I've now had a chance to read the appropriate section in Mr Follett's
draft Tavvie paper on hate. I've been asked to referee some parts of
the paper on group dynamics and have decided to volunteer a few
comments on the interesting behaviour of his Easynews stalker. I've
submitted my findings to Mr Follett. As soon as I have his permission
to reproduce my comments I'll be pleased to do so  on some Usenet
newsgroups where regular contributors may be puzzled by the stalker's
seeming compulsive obsession with Mr. Follett and , to a lesser extent
with Mr. Dave Pepper -- a frequent contributor to the surrey newsgroup
in the uk hierachy."
- Richard Christopher. RNIB Redhill. Posting to Usenet since 1997.

"Arrrrgh, Jim, lad, ye be too set in your ways to try and hide your posting 
style now." - Tobias

wrote in message 
news:647ca1a0-6ea9-48b3-bd44-822d970e5680@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 4, 7:35 pm, "Tobias Bridge" 
wrote:

>> He blew it last year with his Blind Richard sock but I expect he forgot
>> about that following his stroke.

> I couldn't think what the dumb cuntwit is whibbling about. Then I
> remembered. Last year he was trumpetting about his knowledge of usenet
> saying that Follett could not have been posting to usenet 25 years ago
> because it didn't exist that long ago. Duh... This from a shaghead who
> can't even get the acronym ROFL right! A simple four letter acronym
> and he fucks it up!

ROLF! Take it easy, James. Remember what the specialist said about losing 
your temper.

> So a little prank was played on him to see just how stupid he could be
> and he didn't let us down. With the help of a friend who undertstands
> such things, I sent a usenet post using Follett's Demon IP. For
> reasons I don't understand it had to be done with a direct cable
> connection and it has to done with Windows XP/SP2. It doesn't work
> with Vista. All this was explained to him but he didn't understand.
>
> And for the biggest socket set on usenet to complain about socket sets
> is just funny. I'd better not tell him that my flat is owned by the
> RNIB. Cerebral overload although he might swallow my telling him that
> the rent is collected by men in black helicopters.

It's the way you tell 'em, James. A "famous" author like yourself not only 
produces a turgid stool of pulp fiction, he also produces a very 
recognisable Usenet posting style and this is carried over every time in 
your Blind Richard sock posts - see above. All your waffle about "using 
Follett's Demon IP" will not hide the fact that you made the cardinal error 
of a would be sock. You forgot to change the settings and showed to all 
reading the post in question just how much of a liar James Follett is.

Take the easy route like wot I do - just change your posting name and email 
every now and again and bypass Tony Wright's famous Killfile Recipes!

Thanks, Tony!

-- 
Tobias Bridge

"I've now had a chance to read the appropriate section in Mr Follett's
draft Tavvie paper on hate. I've been asked to referee some parts of
the paper on group dynamics and have decided to volunteer a few
comments on the interesting behaviour of his Easynews stalker. I've
submitted my findings to Mr Follett. As soon as I have his permission
to reproduce my comments I'll be pleased to do so  on some Usenet
newsgroups where regular contributors may be puzzled by the stalker's
seeming compulsive obsession with Mr. Follett and , to a lesser extent
with Mr. Dave Pepper -- a frequent contributor to the surrey newsgroup
in the uk hierachy."
- Richard Christopher. RNIB Redhill. Posting to Usenet since 1997.

"Arrrrgh, Jim, lad, ye be too set in your ways to try and hide your posting 
style now." - Tobias

richardrnib@googlemail.com wrote:
> On Jul 4, 7:35 pm, "Tobias Bridge" 
> wrote:
> 
>> He blew it last year with his Blind Richard sock but I expect he forgot
>> about that following his stroke.
> 
> I couldn't think what the dumb cuntwit is whibbling about. Then I
> remembered. Last year he was trumpetting about his knowledge of usenet
> saying that Follett could not have been posting to usenet 25 years ago
> because it didn't exist that long ago. Duh... This from a shaghead who
> can't even get the acronym ROFL right! A simple four letter acronym
> and he fucks it up!

ROLF!

> 
> So a little prank was played on him to see just how stupid he could be
> and he didn't let us down. With the help of a friend who undertstands
> such things, I sent a usenet post using Follett's Demon IP. For
> reasons I don't understand it had to be done with a direct cable
> connection and it has to done with Windows XP/SP2. It doesn't work
> with Vista. All this was explained to him but he didn't understand.
> 
> And for the biggest socket set on usenet to complain about socket sets
> is just funny. I'd better not tell him that my flat is owned by the
> RNIB. Cerebral overload although he might swallow my telling him that
> the rent is collected by men in black helicopters.
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 
ah

"ah"  wrote in message 
news:486f5a7b$0$92701$892e0abb@auth.newsreader.octanews.com...
> richardrnib@googlemail.com wrote:
>> On Jul 4, 7:35 pm, "Tobias Bridge" 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> He blew it last year with his Blind Richard sock but I expect he forgot
>>> about that following his stroke.
>>
>> I couldn't think what the dumb cuntwit is whibbling about. Then I
>> remembered. Last year he was trumpetting about his knowledge of usenet
>> saying that Follett could not have been posting to usenet 25 years ago
>> because it didn't exist that long ago. Duh... This from a shaghead who
>> can't even get the acronym ROFL right! A simple four letter acronym
>> and he fucks it up!
>
> ROLF!

ROLF!

>
>>
>> So a little prank was played on him to see just how stupid he could be
>> and he didn't let us down. With the help of a friend who undertstands
>> such things, I sent a usenet post using Follett's Demon IP. For
>> reasons I don't understand it had to be done with a direct cable
>> connection and it has to done with Windows XP/SP2. It doesn't work
>> with Vista. All this was explained to him but he didn't understand.
>>
>> And for the biggest socket set on usenet to complain about socket sets
>> is just funny. I'd better not tell him that my flat is owned by the
>> RNIB. Cerebral overload although he might swallow my telling him that
>> the rent is collected by men in black helicopters.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

-- 
Tobias Bridge

"I've now had a chance to read the appropriate section in Mr Follett's
draft Tavvie paper on hate. I've been asked to referee some parts of
the paper on group dynamics and have decided to volunteer a few
comments on the interesting behaviour of his Easynews stalker. I've
submitted my findings to Mr Follett. As soon as I have his permission
to reproduce my comments I'll be pleased to do so  on some Usenet
newsgroups where regular contributors may be puzzled by the stalker's
seeming compulsive obsession with Mr. Follett and , to a lesser extent
with Mr. Dave Pepper -- a frequent contributor to the surrey newsgroup
in the uk hierachy."
- Richard Christopher. RNIB Redhill. Posting to Usenet since 1997.

"Arrrrgh, Jim, lad, ye be too set in your ways to try and hide your posting 
style now." - Tobias

Tobias Bridge wrote:
> "ah"  wrote in message
> news:486f5a7b$0$92701$892e0abb@auth.newsreader.octanews.com...
>> richardrnib@googlemail.com wrote:
>>> On Jul 4, 7:35 pm, "Tobias Bridge" 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> He blew it last year with his Blind Richard sock but I expect he
>>>> forgot about that following his stroke.
>>>
>>> I couldn't think what the dumb cuntwit is whibbling about. Then I
>>> remembered. Last year he was trumpetting about his knowledge of
>>> usenet saying that Follett could not have been posting to usenet 25
>>> years ago because it didn't exist that long ago. Duh... This from a
>>> shaghead who can't even get the acronym ROFL right! A simple four
>>> letter acronym and he fucks it up!
>>
>> ROLF!
>
> ROLF!

Tie me kangaroo down sport.

On Sat, 05 Jul 2008 13:49:21 +0100, Tobias Bridge wrote:

<massive snip>

> ROLF!

I would suggest trimming your posts when in uk.misc: you wouldn't 
want to be mistaken for a common or garden fucktard.

-- 
One way ticket from Mornington Crescent to Tannhauser Gate please.

In article <486fef47$0$883$ba4acef3@news.orange.fr>, 
j.murphy@libertysurf.fr says...
> 
> Tie me kangaroo down sport. 
> 

TMI

-- 
eric
"live fast, die only if strictly necessary"

Fevric J Glandules <fevric@invalid.invalid> writes:

> On Sat, 05 Jul 2008 13:49:21 +0100, Tobias Bridge wrote:
>
> <massive snip>
>
>> ROLF!
>
> I would suggest trimming your posts when in uk.misc: you wouldn't 
> want to be mistaken for a common or garden fucktard.

Quite right; we stand for nothing but well-educated, cultured, and
refined, fucktards around here!

-- 
Would you please one more time

On Sun, 06 Jul 2008 01:48:36 +0100, August West wrote:

> Fevric J Glandules <fevric@invalid.invalid> writes:
> 
>> On Sat, 05 Jul 2008 13:49:21 +0100, Tobias Bridge wrote:
>>
>> <massive snip>
>>
>>> ROLF!
>>
>> I would suggest trimming your posts when in uk.misc: you wouldn't 
>> want to be mistaken for a common or garden fucktard.
> 
> Quite right; we stand for nothing but well-educated, cultured, and
> refined, fucktards around here!

Too many commas.

-- 
One way ticket from Mornington Crescent to Tannhauser Gate please.

Fevric J Glandules <fevric@invalid.invalid> writes:

> On Sun, 06 Jul 2008 01:48:36 +0100, August West wrote:
>
>> Quite right; we stand for nothing but well-educated, cultured, and
>> refined, fucktards around here!
>
> Too many commas.

The fuck!

-- 
white line fever

Fevric J Glandules wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Jul 2008 13:49:21 +0100, Tobias Bridge wrote:
> 
> <massive snip>
> 
>> ROLF!
> 
> I would suggest trimming your posts when in uk.misc: you wouldn't 
> want to be mistaken for a common or garden fucktard.

The common--or "garden"--variety of fucktard prefers sandy, loose soil.

The robustness of our substrate would soon choke-out such tender-rooted ilk.
-- 
ah

August West wrote:
> Fevric J Glandules <fevric@invalid.invalid> writes:
> 
>> On Sun, 06 Jul 2008 01:48:36 +0100, August West wrote:
>>
>>> Quite right; we stand for nothing but well-educated, cultured, and
>>> refined, fucktards around here!
>>
>> Too many commas.
> 
> The fuck!

You're just saying that.
-- 
ah

Tobias Bridge wrote:
> "ah"  wrote in message 
> news:486f5a7b$0$92701$892e0abb@auth.newsreader.octanews.com...
>> richardrnib@googlemail.com wrote:
>>> On Jul 4, 7:35 pm, "Tobias Bridge" 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> He blew it last year with his Blind Richard sock but I expect he forgot
>>>> about that following his stroke.
>>>
>>> I couldn't think what the dumb cuntwit is whibbling about. Then I
>>> remembered. Last year he was trumpetting about his knowledge of usenet
>>> saying that Follett could not have been posting to usenet 25 years ago
>>> because it didn't exist that long ago. Duh... This from a shaghead who
>>> can't even get the acronym ROFL right! A simple four letter acronym
>>> and he fucks it up!
>>
>> ROLF!
> 
> ROLF!

ROLF!

> 
>>
>>>
>>> So a little prank was played on him to see just how stupid he could be
>>> and he didn't let us down. With the help of a friend who undertstands
>>> such things, I sent a usenet post using Follett's Demon IP. For
>>> reasons I don't understand it had to be done with a direct cable
>>> connection and it has to done with Windows XP/SP2. It doesn't work
>>> with Vista. All this was explained to him but he didn't understand.
>>>
>>> And for the biggest socket set on usenet to complain about socket sets
>>> is just funny. I'd better not tell him that my flat is owned by the
>>> RNIB. Cerebral overload although he might swallow my telling him that
>>> the rent is collected by men in black helicopters.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> 


-- 
ah

"JF"  wrote in message 
news:lKjIzwLbzycIFw$j@marage.demon.co.uk...
> In message <4873213c$0$92711$892e0abb@auth.newsreader.octanews.com>, ah 
>  writes
>>>> richardrnib@googlemail.com wrote:
>
>>>>> So a little prank was played on him to see just how stupid he could be
>>>>> and he didn't let us down. With the help of a friend who undertstands
>>>>> such things, I sent a usenet post using Follett's Demon IP. For
>>>>> reasons I don't understand it had to be done with a direct cable
>>>>> connection and it has to done with Windows XP/SP2. It doesn't work
>>>>> with Vista. All this was explained to him but he didn't understand.
>
> It wasn't explained to me and it was my IP that was used. What's the 
> importance of using a cable modem and why does the trick only work with 
> XP/SP2? Does any one know?
>
> -- 
> James Follett
>

Aarrrgh, give it up, Jimbo, lad, you were outed and these posts from you to 
your sock make you look even more foolish. (If that's possible.)

-- 
Phineas

"The Sig Bunny. Born of the unholy union between a cute fluffy bunny and
a rabid wolverine. It stalks the wastelands of demon local, its prey
those who post with sigs greater than four lines. It is always hungry
but food is plentiful." (Craig Oldfield - demon.local)

"I don't do 'ignore' when it comes to long sigs. I challenge them. Every
single one. Sig-flaming is what we do. Successfully. In a perverse way,
I admired some of the Meowers and in another life I could perhaps see
myself as part of such a thing." (Neil Barker - demon.local)

"ah"  wrote in message 
news:48732110$0$92711$892e0abb@auth.newsreader.octanews.com...
> Fevric J Glandules wrote:
>> On Sat, 05 Jul 2008 13:49:21 +0100, Tobias Bridge wrote:
>>
>> <massive snip>
>>
>>> ROLF!
>>
>> I would suggest trimming your posts when in uk.misc: you wouldn't
>> want to be mistaken for a common or garden fucktard.
>
> The common--or "garden"--variety of fucktard prefers sandy, loose soil.
>
> The robustness of our substrate would soon choke-out such tender-rooted 
> ilk.
> -- 
> ah

Yup.

-- 
Phineas

"The Sig Bunny. Born of the unholy union between a cute fluffy bunny and
a rabid wolverine. It stalks the wastelands of demon local, its prey
those who post with sigs greater than four lines. It is always hungry
but food is plentiful." (Craig Oldfield - demon.local)

"I don't do 'ignore' when it comes to long sigs. I challenge them. Every
single one. Sig-flaming is what we do. Successfully. In a perverse way,
I admired some of the Meowers and in another life I could perhaps see
myself as part of such a thing." (Neil Barker - demon.local)

"ah"  wrote in message 
news:4873213c$0$92711$892e0abb@auth.newsreader.octanews.com...
> Tobias Bridge wrote:
>> "ah"  wrote in message
>> news:486f5a7b$0$92701$892e0abb@auth.newsreader.octanews.com...
>>> richardrnib@googlemail.com wrote:
>>>> On Jul 4, 7:35 pm, "Tobias Bridge" 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> He blew it last year with his Blind Richard sock but I expect he 
>>>>> forgot
>>>>> about that following his stroke.
>>>>
>>>> I couldn't think what the dumb cuntwit is whibbling about. Then I
>>>> remembered. Last year he was trumpetting about his knowledge of usenet
>>>> saying that Follett could not have been posting to usenet 25 years ago
>>>> because it didn't exist that long ago. Duh... This from a shaghead who
>>>> can't even get the acronym ROFL right! A simple four letter acronym
>>>> and he fucks it up!
>>>
>>> ROLF!
>>
>> ROLF!
>
> ROLF!

ROLF!

>
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> So a little prank was played on him to see just how stupid he could be
>>>> and he didn't let us down. With the help of a friend who undertstands
>>>> such things, I sent a usenet post using Follett's Demon IP. For
>>>> reasons I don't understand it had to be done with a direct cable
>>>> connection and it has to done with Windows XP/SP2. It doesn't work
>>>> with Vista. All this was explained to him but he didn't understand.
>>>>
>>>> And for the biggest socket set on usenet to complain about socket sets
>>>> is just funny. I'd better not tell him that my flat is owned by the
>>>> RNIB. Cerebral overload although he might swallow my telling him that
>>>> the rent is collected by men in black helicopters.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> -- 
> ah

-- 
Phineas

"The Sig Bunny. Born of the unholy union between a cute fluffy bunny and
a rabid wolverine. It stalks the wastelands of demon local, its prey
those who post with sigs greater than four lines. It is always hungry
but food is plentiful." (Craig Oldfield - demon.local)

"I don't do 'ignore' when it comes to long sigs. I challenge them. Every
single one. Sig-flaming is what we do. Successfully. In a perverse way,
I admired some of the Meowers and in another life I could perhaps see
myself as part of such a thing." (Neil Barker - demon.local)

Phineas Bunce wrote:
> "ah"  wrote in message 
> news:4873213c$0$92711$892e0abb@auth.newsreader.octanews.com...
>> Tobias Bridge wrote:
>>> "ah"  wrote in message
>>> news:486f5a7b$0$92701$892e0abb@auth.newsreader.octanews.com...
>>>> richardrnib@googlemail.com wrote:
>>>>> On Jul 4, 7:35 pm, "Tobias Bridge" 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> He blew it last year with his Blind Richard sock but I expect he 
>>>>>> forgot
>>>>>> about that following his stroke.
>>>>>
>>>>> I couldn't think what the dumb cuntwit is whibbling about. Then I
>>>>> remembered. Last year he was trumpetting about his knowledge of usenet
>>>>> saying that Follett could not have been posting to usenet 25 years ago
>>>>> because it didn't exist that long ago. Duh... This from a shaghead who
>>>>> can't even get the acronym ROFL right! A simple four letter acronym
>>>>> and he fucks it up!
>>>>
>>>> ROLF!
>>>
>>> ROLF!
>>
>> ROLF!
> 
> ROLF!

ROLF!

> 
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So a little prank was played on him to see just how stupid he could be
>>>>> and he didn't let us down. With the help of a friend who undertstands
>>>>> such things, I sent a usenet post using Follett's Demon IP. For
>>>>> reasons I don't understand it had to be done with a direct cable
>>>>> connection and it has to done with Windows XP/SP2. It doesn't work
>>>>> with Vista. All this was explained to him but he didn't understand.
>>>>>
>>>>> And for the biggest socket set on usenet to complain about socket sets
>>>>> is just funny. I'd better not tell him that my flat is owned by the
>>>>> RNIB. Cerebral overload although he might swallow my telling him that
>>>>> the rent is collected by men in black helicopters.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> ah
> 


-- 
ah