Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
misc
announce
answers
consultants
d-i-y
environment
environment.conservation
gov.agency.csa
gov.local
gov.social-security
gov.social-work
misc
philosophy.atheism
philosophy.humanism
philosophy.misc
radio.amateur
railway
sci.astronomy
sci.med.nursing
sci.med.pharmacy
sci.misc
sci.weather
singles
telecom
telecom.broadband
telecom.mobile
telecom.voip
test
transport
transport.air
transport.buses
transport.ferry
transport.london
transport.ride-sharing
  
 
date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 02:36:44 GMT,    group: uk.misc        back       
[geek] Gnome / networking crapfest   
Have spent literally hours rebooting this machine trying to work out
why the Gnome desktop would take minutes to get going, and fail to
sort out the audio whilst doing so.  This used to be an intermittent
problem, and rebooting with fingers crossed used to work.  Of course
I don't reboot that often, so it's not been such a pain, until now.

Finally sorted by booting without the PCMCIA networking card inserted,
then pushing it in once the desktop's up.

WTF's that all about?  Has Gnu/Linux jumped the shark?  Can I have a 
reliable OS and desktop that don't suffer from insane dependencies 
and race conditions?  Is Gnome trying to ape the world of Windows by
making everything a homogeneous mess?  Does *BSD have any sort of 
support for laptops?  Is KDE any better?

-- 
One way ticket from Mornington Crescent to Tannhauser Gate please.
date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 02:36:44 GMT   author:   Fevric J Glandules lid

Re: [geek] Gnome / networking crapfest   
On 2008-06-28, Fevric J Glandules <fevric@invalid.invalid> wrote:

> Is Gnome trying to ape the world of Windows by
> making everything a homogeneous mess? 

I fear so.

-- 
          "Be thankful that you have a life, and forsake your vain
                 and presumptuous desire for a second one."
               [email me at huge {at} huge (dot) org <dot> uk]
date: 28 Jun 2008 10:56:03 GMT   author:   Huge lid

Re: [geek] Gnome / networking crapfest   
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 02:36:44 GMT, Fevric J Glandules wrote:

> Have spent literally hours rebooting this machine trying to work out
> why the Gnome desktop would take minutes to get going, and fail to
> sort out the audio whilst doing so.  This used to be an intermittent
> problem, and rebooting with fingers crossed used to work.  Of course
> I don't reboot that often, so it's not been such a pain, until now.
> 
> Finally sorted by booting without the PCMCIA networking card inserted,
> then pushing it in once the desktop's up.
> 
> WTF's that all about?  Has Gnu/Linux jumped the shark?  Can I have a 
> reliable OS and desktop that don't suffer from insane dependencies 
> and race conditions?  Is Gnome trying to ape the world of Windows by
> making everything a homogeneous mess?  Does *BSD have any sort of 
> support for laptops?  Is KDE any better?

I prefer KDE to Gnome, but find that Fluxbox is better than either.


-- 
Gruesome and low tech. Kiss me, I love it.
date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 12:03:07 +0100   author:   Hot Badger Deluxe

Re: [geek] Gnome / networking crapfest   
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 12:03:07 +0100, Hot Badger Deluxe wrote:

> I prefer KDE to Gnome, but find that Fluxbox is better than either.

Trying to remember if I've tried that.  Used to use IceWm.

Most of the alternatives seem to imply lots of time setting 
them up.

Oh, and booting without the network card in seemed to be fluke.

But booting undocked from the docking station and then re-docked
seems to help the chicken entrails align in the right way.

-- 
One way ticket from Mornington Crescent to Tannhauser Gate please.
date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 12:26:09 GMT   author:   Fevric J Glandules lid

Re: [geek] Gnome / networking crapfest   
Hot Badger Deluxe  writes:

> On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 02:36:44 GMT, Fevric J Glandules wrote:
>
>> Have spent literally hours rebooting this machine trying to work out
>> why the Gnome desktop would take minutes to get going, and fail to
>> sort out the audio whilst doing so.  This used to be an intermittent
>> problem, and rebooting with fingers crossed used to work.  Of course
>> I don't reboot that often, so it's not been such a pain, until now.
>> 
>> Finally sorted by booting without the PCMCIA networking card inserted,
>> then pushing it in once the desktop's up.
>> 
>> WTF's that all about?  Has Gnu/Linux jumped the shark?  Can I have a 
>> reliable OS and desktop that don't suffer from insane dependencies 
>> and race conditions?  Is Gnome trying to ape the world of Windows by
>> making everything a homogeneous mess?  Does *BSD have any sort of 
>> support for laptops?  Is KDE any better?
>
> I prefer KDE to Gnome, but find that Fluxbox is better than either.

Xfce, here; as it also allows use of gnome & kde apps easily.

-- 
we get hungover but we always survive it
date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 14:00:32 +0100   author:   August West

Re: [geek] Gnome / networking crapfest   
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 14:00:32 +0100, August West wrote:

> Xfce, here; as it also allows use of gnome & kde apps easily.

Didn't like it much.

-- 
One way ticket from Mornington Crescent to Tannhauser Gate please.
date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:36:34 GMT   author:   Fevric J Glandules lid

Re: [geek] Gnome / networking crapfest   
Fevric J Glandules <fevric@invalid.invalid> writes:

> On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 14:00:32 +0100, August West wrote:
>
>> Xfce, here; as it also allows use of gnome & kde apps easily.
>
> Didn't like it much.

Why not?  On small machines, and winblows boxes, where I don't
need/don't want/can't run Gnome &U KDE apps, I still use fvwm.

-- 
I hear her name here and there as I go from town to town
date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 14:41:52 +0100   author:   August West

Re: [geek] Gnome / networking crapfest   
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 12:26:09 GMT, Fevric J Glandules wrote:

<snip>

Here's my default Fluxbox screen:

http://badjazz.org/pics/screenshot.png


-- 
His socks compelled one's attention without losing one's respect.
date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:51:39 +0100   author:   Hot Badger Deluxe

Re: [geek] Gnome / networking crapfest   
August West  writes:

> Why not?  On small machines, and winblows boxes, where I don't
> need/don't want/can't run Gnome &U KDE apps, I still use fvwm.

I use fvwm just about everywhere.

Matthew

-- 
 `O'-----0     `O'---.       `O'---.       `O'---.
   \___| |       \___|0-/      \___|/        \___|
    |  | /\       |  |  \       |  |\         |  |
The Dangers of modern veterinary life
date: 02 Jul 2008 16:18:09 +0100   author:   Matthew Vernon

Re: [geek] Gnome / networking crapfest   
Matthew Vernon  writes:

> August West  writes:
>
>> Why not?  On small machines, and winblows boxes, where I don't
>> need/don't want/can't run Gnome &U KDE apps, I still use fvwm.
>
> I use fvwm just about everywhere.

Many years ago, in a different life, I wrote parts of fvwm.

-- 
Don't have to look no further
date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 20:06:02 +0100   author:   August West

Re: [geek] Gnome / networking crapfest   
August West  wrote:

> Many years ago, in a different life, I wrote parts of fvwm.

The list of reasons for burning you is getting longer you know.
date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 20:19:19 +0100   author:   %steve%@malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth)

Re: [geek] Gnome / networking crapfest   
In article ,
August West   wrote:
>Many years ago, in a different life, I wrote parts of fvwm.

You weren't Richard Caley, were you?

Oh, that was tvtwm.

-- Richard
-- 
Please remember to mention me / in tapes you leave behind.
date: 2 Jul 2008 20:09:28 GMT   author:   (Richard Tobin)

Re: [geek] Gnome / networking crapfest   
On Wed, 02 Jul 2008 20:06:02 +0100, I waved a wand and this message
magically appears in front of August West:

> > I use fvwm just about everywhere.
> 
> Many years ago, in a different life, I wrote parts of fvwm.

4 out of 6 FVWM developers own cats. Fascinating.
-- 
http://www.munted.org.uk

Fearsome grindings.
date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 21:48:12 +0100   author:   Alex Buell

Re: [geek] Gnome / networking crapfest   
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 21:48:12 +0100, Alex Buell
 wrote this:

>4 out of 6 FVWM developers own cats. Fascinating.

I read that as "4 out of 6 FVWM developers are cats" and boggled.





-- 
Grk!
date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 07:42:18 +0100   author:   Hypodeemic Nerdle dnacni

Re: [geek] Gnome / networking crapfest   
On Thu, 03 Jul 2008 07:42:18 +0100, Hypodeemic Nerdle wrote:

> On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 21:48:12 +0100, Alex Buell
>  wrote this:
> 
>>4 out of 6 FVWM developers own cats. Fascinating.
> 
> I read that as "4 out of 6 FVWM developers are cats" and boggled.

I actually haven't read either of these posts.


-- 
The neurotic has problems,the psychotic has solutions.
date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 07:50:47 +0100   author:   Hot Badger Deluxe

Re: [geek] Gnome / networking crapfest   
"Hot Badger Deluxe"  wrote

>>>4 out of 6 FVWM developers own cats. Fascinating.
>>
>> I read that as "4 out of 6 FVWM developers are cats" and boggled.
>
> I actually haven't read either of these posts.

Neither have I, yet - I'm still asleep.
date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 09:35:25 +0100   author:   Number Two

Re: [geek] Gnome / networking crapfest   
On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 09:35:25 +0100, Number Two wrote:

> "Hot Badger Deluxe"  wrote
> 
>>>>4 out of 6 FVWM developers own cats. Fascinating.
>>>
>>> I read that as "4 out of 6 FVWM developers are cats" and boggled.
>>
>> I actually haven't read either of these posts.
> 
> Neither have I, yet - I'm still asleep.

OK - so in which arcane and unlikely location are you, currently?

I'm at home, listening to Face by Meira Asher. A staggeringly good record.

http://www.meiraasher.net/

This is hardcore stuff. Seriously.

Her first album, Dissected, is well within my top 10.


-- 
I never desire to converse with a man who 
has written more than he has read.
date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 09:47:04 +0100   author:   Hot Badger Deluxe

Re: [geek] Gnome / networking crapfest   
"Hot Badger Deluxe"  wrote

> OK - so in which arcane and unlikely location are you, currently?
>
> I'm at home

M3 2, since about 1:30 this morning - I'm trying to stay awake and beat the 
lag[1].

> http://www.meiraasher.net/
>
> This is hardcore stuff. Seriously.

Hmmmm, currently pausing my pr0n download to listen.

[1] No points for the obvious post edit.
date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 10:31:11 +0100   author:   Number Two

Re: [geek] Gnome / networking crapfest   
On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 09:35:25 +0100, "Number Two"
 wrote:

>
>"Hot Badger Deluxe"  wrote
>
>>>>4 out of 6 FVWM developers own cats. Fascinating.
>>>
>>> I read that as "4 out of 6 FVWM developers are cats" and boggled.
>>
>> I actually haven't read either of these posts.
>
>Neither have I, yet - I'm still asleep.

You said you'd be in a pub this week meeting me for a drink, you lazy
so and so, not asleep.
-- 
YouTube Video of MI5 HorrorFags; www.youtube.com/watch?v=5e9x0TwHkbY
Jealous Gay Agents Masturbating Outside Window; www.mi5.com/evidence/#britspy
MI5 Tried to Kill Me in Florida 17/Nov/2001; www.mi5.com/evidence/#deathsquad
MindControl Torture and Proof It's Real; www.mi5.com/evidence/mc/mc.htm
date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 10:33:29 +0100   author:   unknown

Re: [geek] Gnome / networking crapfest   
On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 10:31:11 +0100, Number Two wrote:

> "Hot Badger Deluxe"  wrote
> 
>> OK - so in which arcane and unlikely location are you, currently?
>>
>> I'm at home
> 
> M3 2, since about 1:30 this morning - I'm trying to stay awake and beat the 
> bishop.
> 
>> http://www.meiraasher.net/
>>
>> This is hardcore stuff. Seriously.
> 
> Hmmmm, currently pausing my pr0n download to listen.

She's an Israeli feminist. And, musically, an absolute fucking genius.

Or, if you want something more cheery:

Robyn Hitchcock - Brenda's Iron Sledge

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ckpRHX880Po


> [1] No points for the obvious post edit.

As if...



-- 
An expert is a man who has made all the mistakes 
which can be made in a very narrow field.
date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 10:40:56 +0100   author:   Hot Badger Deluxe

Re: [geek] Gnome / networking crapfest   
wrote

> You said you'd be in a pub this week meeting me for a drink, you lazy
> so and so, not asleep.

Ah, bollocks! Sorry!

The main drawback to my current occupation is a total lack of foresight.
date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 10:43:03 +0100   author:   Number Two

Re: [geek] Gnome / networking crapfest   
On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 10:43:03 +0100, Number Two wrote:

>  wrote
> 
>> You said you'd be in a pub this week meeting me for a drink, you lazy
>> so and so, not asleep.
> 
> Ah, bollocks! Sorry!
> 
> The main drawback to my current occupation is a total lack of foreskin.

TMI


-- 
I heard there was a secret chord
That David played and it pleased the lord
But you don't really care for music, do you?
date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 10:46:26 +0100   author:   Hot Badger Deluxe

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us