Fevric J Glandules <fevric@invalid.invalid> writes:

> On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 14:47:07 +0100, August West wrote:
>
>> JAF  writes:
>> 
>>> All the mumbo-jumbo is still irrelevant.  That is, religious weddings
>>> are meaningless under the law.
>> 
>> Yes, the religious parts are irrelevant and varible - as are the
>> self-penned "vows" I've heard people drivel at civil ceremonies; but the
>> religious ceremonies are still full and legal wedding ceremonies, so
>> hardly "meaningless under the law".
>
> I'm sure you're both violently agreeing with each other, if only
> you'd stop bickering for a moment.

No; I'm disagreeoing with the "meaningless under the law" claim, as they
are just as legaly meaningful as civil ceremines. JAF's religious hatred
is blinding him again.

-- 
Let's make the best of the situation