Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
misc
announce
answers
consultants
d-i-y
environment
environment.conservation
gov.agency.csa
gov.local
gov.social-security
gov.social-work
misc
philosophy.atheism
philosophy.humanism
philosophy.misc
radio.amateur
railway
sci.astronomy
sci.med.nursing
sci.med.pharmacy
sci.misc
sci.weather
singles
telecom
telecom.broadband
telecom.mobile
telecom.voip
test
transport
transport.air
transport.buses
transport.ferry
transport.london
transport.ride-sharing
  
 
date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 13:54:52 GMT,    group: uk.misc        back       
Re: so anyway   
On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 14:47:07 +0100, August West wrote:

> JAF  writes:
> 
>> All the mumbo-jumbo is still irrelevant.  That is, religious weddings
>> are meaningless under the law.
> 
> Yes, the religious parts are irrelevant and varible - as are the
> self-penned "vows" I've heard people drivel at civil ceremonies; but the
> religious ceremonies are still full and legal wedding ceremonies, so
> hardly "meaningless under the law".

I'm sure you're both violently agreeing with each other, if only
you'd stop bickering for a moment.

-- 
One way ticket from Mornington Crescent to Tannhauser Gate please.
date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 13:54:52 GMT   author:   Fevric J Glandules lid

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us