Re: so anyway
On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 14:47:07 +0100, August West wrote:
> JAF writes:
>
>> All the mumbo-jumbo is still irrelevant. That is, religious weddings
>> are meaningless under the law.
>
> Yes, the religious parts are irrelevant and varible - as are the
> self-penned "vows" I've heard people drivel at civil ceremonies; but the
> religious ceremonies are still full and legal wedding ceremonies, so
> hardly "meaningless under the law".
I'm sure you're both violently agreeing with each other, if only
you'd stop bickering for a moment.
--
One way ticket from Mornington Crescent to Tannhauser Gate please.
date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 13:54:52 GMT
author: Fevric J Glandules lid
|