|
|
|
date: Fri, 16 May 2008 22:06:09 +0200,
group: uk.misc
back
Bells (no not the whisky)
I've always lived within the sound of church bells, although once I was
a kilometre or so away so only heard them during the quiet night. Now
I'm about thirty metres from the local church and can see the belfry
from my window so get them loud and clear.
After a violent storm the other day which blacked out a section of the
village, the mechanism/electronic control or whatever (no bell ringers
any more except for weddings and funerals) got blown up by lightning. A
few other things too I heard like modems, screens, tvs etc. Fortunately
the blackout stopped just across the street (about two metres) so I
suffered no damage. It meant though that neither the clock chimed nor
did I get the three sets of dings in low pitch then several dings in a
higher one that called the faithful (both of them in this now very
secular country) to morning service at just after eight AM. A wonderful
and pleasant alarm clock which I missed greatly. In France all churches
belong to the state and are just rented out to the Christians, which
means that the people responsible for such things are the 'Batiments de
France' an official organisation of the state which looks after the
heritage of the country and is based, of course, in Paris. I expected
the worst and thought the problem wouldn't be sorted out until about
2010 at the earliest.
But lo and behold, this afternoon after much bonging at odd times as
they no doubt set the clock right and tested the whole thing they are
back on line, well on ding anyway. Ouf. I really did miss them.
ITSOL
Had any problems with your balls, sorry, bells lately?
/ITSOL
date: Fri, 16 May 2008 22:06:09 +0200
author: John of Aix
|
Re: Bells (no not the whisky)
In article <482de932$0$854$ba4acef3@news.orange.fr>,
j.murphy@libertysurf.fr says...
> ITSOL
> Had any problems with your balls, sorry, bells lately?
> /ITSOL
You would not believe the trouble. Mainly, the clanger was off centre,
hitting the bell at an angle, making it more prone to crack, so we had
to turn the clock off. We thought that just stopping the clanger (it's
the PCC's technical term, although I did point out that it's called a
striker) would do the trick but no, we had to stop the clock.
It took nearly a year to find the diocese's clockman to come and fix
everything. Now the clock's striking the hours and the quarters but it's
five minutes out. The thought of raising this at PCC fills me with
horror so I'll just live with it.
date: Mon, 19 May 2008 10:39:10 +0100
author: Amethyst Deceiver
|
Re: Bells (no not the whisky)
"Amethyst Deceiver" wrote in message
news:MPG.229b5b18f85f9b4298999d@news.individual.de...
> In article <482de932$0$854$ba4acef3@news.orange.fr>,
> j.murphy@libertysurf.fr says...
>
>> ITSOL
>> Had any problems with your balls, sorry, bells lately?
>> /ITSOL
>
> You would not believe the trouble. Mainly, the clanger was off centre,
> hitting the bell at an angle, making it more prone to crack, so we had
> to turn the clock off. We thought that just stopping the clanger (it's
> the PCC's technical term, although I did point out that it's called a
> striker) would do the trick but no, we had to stop the clock.
>
> It took nearly a year to find the diocese's clockman to come and fix
> everything. Now the clock's striking the hours and the quarters but it's
> five minutes out. The thought of raising this at PCC fills me with
> horror so I'll just live with it.
Can't you just allow the clock to stop (again) for 5 minutes / 11 hours 55
minutes as applicable and then restart it?
date: Thu, 22 May 2008 08:12:53 +0100
author: Ian D Henden
|
Re: Bells (no not the whisky)
In article <K19Zj.48841$4N1.33660@newsfe17.ams2>, idh@henden.co.uk
says...
>
> "Amethyst Deceiver" wrote in message
> news:MPG.229b5b18f85f9b4298999d@news.individual.de...
> > In article <482de932$0$854$ba4acef3@news.orange.fr>,
> > j.murphy@libertysurf.fr says...
> >
> >> ITSOL
> >> Had any problems with your balls, sorry, bells lately?
> >> /ITSOL
> >
> > You would not believe the trouble. Mainly, the clanger was off centre,
> > hitting the bell at an angle, making it more prone to crack, so we had
> > to turn the clock off. We thought that just stopping the clanger (it's
> > the PCC's technical term, although I did point out that it's called a
> > striker) would do the trick but no, we had to stop the clock.
> >
> > It took nearly a year to find the diocese's clockman to come and fix
> > everything. Now the clock's striking the hours and the quarters but it's
> > five minutes out. The thought of raising this at PCC fills me with
> > horror so I'll just live with it.
>
>
> Can't you just allow the clock to stop (again) for 5 minutes / 11 hours 55
> minutes as applicable and then restart it?
You'd think. But I have a feeling it involves getting the clockman in to
restart it and anyway, we spent 2.5 hours on yesterday's PCC on one
sodding item that personally I don't think required quite so long. I
couldn't bear introducing anything else to the agenda.
date: Thu, 22 May 2008 12:37:31 +0100
author: Amethyst Deceiver
|
Re: Bells (no not the whisky)
"Amethyst Deceiver" wrote in message
news:MPG.229f6b598dcda60b9899b9@news.individual.de...
> In article <K19Zj.48841$4N1.33660@newsfe17.ams2>, idh@henden.co.uk
> says...
>>
>> "Amethyst Deceiver" wrote in message
>> news:MPG.229b5b18f85f9b4298999d@news.individual.de...
>> > In article <482de932$0$854$ba4acef3@news.orange.fr>,
>> > j.murphy@libertysurf.fr says...
>> >
[....]
>> > It took nearly a year to find the diocese's clockman to come and fix
>> > everything. Now the clock's striking the hours and the quarters but
>> > it's
>> > five minutes out. The thought of raising this at PCC fills me with
>> > horror so I'll just live with it.
>>
>>
>> Can't you just allow the clock to stop (again) for 5 minutes / 11 hours
>> 55
>> minutes as applicable and then restart it?
>
> You'd think. But I have a feeling it involves getting the clockman in to
> restart it and anyway, we spent 2.5 hours on yesterday's PCC on one
> sodding item that personally I don't think required quite so long. I
> couldn't bear introducing anything else to the agenda.
Not Dibley Parish Council, is it? :o)
date: Fri, 23 May 2008 00:00:05 +0100
author: Ian D Henden
|
Re: Bells (no not the whisky)
In article <IVmZj.12$No6.6@newsfe12.ams2>, idh@henden.co.uk says...
>
> "Amethyst Deceiver" wrote in message
> news:MPG.229f6b598dcda60b9899b9@news.individual.de...
> > In article <K19Zj.48841$4N1.33660@newsfe17.ams2>, idh@henden.co.uk
> > says...
> >>
> >> "Amethyst Deceiver" wrote in message
> >> news:MPG.229b5b18f85f9b4298999d@news.individual.de...
> >> > In article <482de932$0$854$ba4acef3@news.orange.fr>,
> >> > j.murphy@libertysurf.fr says...
> >> >
> [....]
> >> > It took nearly a year to find the diocese's clockman to come and fix
> >> > everything. Now the clock's striking the hours and the quarters but
> >> > it's
> >> > five minutes out. The thought of raising this at PCC fills me with
> >> > horror so I'll just live with it.
> >>
> >>
> >> Can't you just allow the clock to stop (again) for 5 minutes / 11 hours
> >> 55
> >> minutes as applicable and then restart it?
> >
> > You'd think. But I have a feeling it involves getting the clockman in to
> > restart it and anyway, we spent 2.5 hours on yesterday's PCC on one
> > sodding item that personally I don't think required quite so long. I
> > couldn't bear introducing anything else to the agenda.
>
> Not Dibley Parish Council, is it? :o)
Ahaha. The vicar has two churches. Last week, it was the other church's
PCC, with a new member. On Sunday she asked the new member's wife how
he'd found his first meeting. "He said he felt a bit like he'd walked
onto the set of 'The Vicar of Dibley'" she replied...
date: Fri, 23 May 2008 10:32:51 +0100
author: Amethyst Deceiver
|
|
|