|
|
|
date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 07:54:05 +0100,
group: uk.gov.social-work
back
Forced adoption sprog prog
Face the Facts, Radio 4 , today
Fri, 12.30pm.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6961521.stm
Last Updated: Friday, 24 August 2007, 02:49 GMT 03:49 UK
Child removal complaints soaring
Adoptions have increased dramatically since 1997
The number of parents claiming their children have been removed from them
unjustly has reached record levels, a BBC investigation has found.
Campaigners and MPs say they have found more than 100 cases where children
may have been put up for adoption without sufficient evidence.
They say social workers are rushing cases to hit adoption targets.
They also claim the secrecy of the family courts is stopping parents
properly challenging adoptions. ...
ps
Exposing corrupt Wiltshire social workers
and an incompetent doubly ex-director of
Wilts social services
http://www.nutteing.chat.ru/nutteing3.htm
or nutteingd in a search engine.
Valid email nutteing@fastmail.....fm (remove 4 of the 5 dots)
Ignore any other apparent em address used to post this message -
it is defunct due to spam.
date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 07:54:05 +0100
author: Paul Nutteing (valid email address in post script )
|
Re: Forced adoption sprog prog
Paul Nutteing (valid email address in post script )
wrote in message
news:5j7dj2F3sea5lU1@mid.individual.net...
> Face the Facts, Radio 4 , today
> Fri, 12.30pm.
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6961521.stm
>
> Last Updated: Friday, 24 August 2007, 02:49 GMT 03:49 UK
> Child removal complaints soaring
>
> Adoptions have increased dramatically since 1997
> The number of parents claiming their children have been removed from them
> unjustly has reached record levels, a BBC investigation has found.
>
> Campaigners and MPs say they have found more than 100 cases where children
> may have been put up for adoption without sufficient evidence.
>
> They say social workers are rushing cases to hit adoption targets.
>
> They also claim the secrecy of the family courts is stopping parents
> properly challenging adoptions. ...
>
>
> ps
> Exposing corrupt Wiltshire social workers
> and an incompetent doubly ex-director of
> Wilts social services
> http://www.nutteing.chat.ru/nutteing3.htm
> or nutteingd in a search engine.
>
> Valid email nutteing@fastmail.....fm (remove 4 of the 5 dots)
> Ignore any other apparent em address used to post this message -
> it is defunct due to spam.
>
>
>
Anyone else pick up on the use of "it" to
refer to a specific baby in question
rather than some generic classification
where the sex is not specific.
One of the fathers and an adoption agency
woman ( or some other non-SW official )
referring to specific cases
Just what social-workers are trained to
pick up at interview, as evidence of
"emotional abuse" "bonding failure issues" and
the other pseudo-psychobable
ps
What they aren't telling you about DNA profiles
and what Special Branch don't want you to know.
http://www.nutteing.chat.ru/dnapr.htm
or nutteingd in a search engine.
date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 08:58:16 +0100
author: Paul Nutteing (valid email address in post script )
|
Re: Forced adoption sprog prog
"Paul Nutteing (valid email address in post script )"
wrote in message
news:5j7dj2F3sea5lU1@mid.individual.net...
> Face the Facts, Radio 4 , today
> Fri, 12.30pm.
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6961521.stm
>
> Last Updated: Friday, 24 August 2007, 02:49 GMT 03:49 UK
> Child removal complaints soaring
>
> Adoptions have increased dramatically since 1997
The number of child homicides has halved.
> The number of parents claiming their children have been removed from them
> unjustly has reached record levels, a BBC investigation has found.
>
I suppose we can have the corollary.
Social Services bent over backwards to set up 3 month old Wayne Bennett with
his parents, even though both were drug addicts. One night when the mother
was out on the game, the father [accidentally] smothered the infant to death
in a freezing flat (freezing because they spent money on drugs instead of a
electric card).
Social services were criticised by the press, neighbours and relatives (one
of whom had written twice before the tragedy stating the parents were unfit
to have custody).
I don't know about you, but in my book the balance goes preponderantly in
favour of the child.
date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 13:03:30 +0100
author: R. Mark Clayton
|
Re: Forced adoption sprog prog
On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 13:03:30 +0100, "R. Mark Clayton"
wrote:
>I suppose we can have the corollary.
>
>Social Services bent over backwards to set up 3 month old Wayne Bennett with
>his parents, even though both were drug addicts. One night when the mother
>was out on the game, the father [accidentally] smothered the infant to death
>in a freezing flat (freezing because they spent money on drugs instead of a
>electric card).
>
>Social services were criticised by the press, neighbours and relatives (one
>of whom had written twice before the tragedy stating the parents were unfit
>to have custody).
Oh, there's lots of anecdotes. John Smith was taken into "care" by
social services because his father *might* have been a risk to him.
He was eventually placed with an adoptive couple where the husband
*was* a risk to him and subsequently killed him.
--
Cynic
date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 18:54:12 +0100
author: Cynic
|
Re: Forced adoption sprog prog
Cynic wrote in message
news:qdf3d3dip9ih1dfdtq81hftcippjml2suh@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 13:03:30 +0100, "R. Mark Clayton"
> wrote:
>
> >I suppose we can have the corollary.
> >
> >Social Services bent over backwards to set up 3 month old Wayne Bennett
with
> >his parents, even though both were drug addicts. One night when the
mother
> >was out on the game, the father [accidentally] smothered the infant to
death
> >in a freezing flat (freezing because they spent money on drugs instead of
a
> >electric card).
> >
> >Social services were criticised by the press, neighbours and relatives
(one
> >of whom had written twice before the tragedy stating the parents were
unfit
> >to have custody).
>
> Oh, there's lots of anecdotes. John Smith was taken into "care" by
> social services because his father *might* have been a risk to him.
> He was eventually placed with an adoptive couple where the husband
> *was* a risk to him and subsequently killed him.
>
> --
> Cynic
>
Just in case anyone though you were
speaking allegorically
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,578939,00.html
Tuesday October 23, 2001
The Guardian
Couple jailed for child's death
The adoptive parents of a four-year-old who had 54 bruises and four bite
marks to his body when he died were yesterday jailed for eight years at
Lewes crown court, East Sussex. Simon and Michelle McWilliam of Southwick,
Brighton, had denied cruelty to John Anthony Smith, who died on Christmas
Eve 1999.
End quote
A case I raised with a professor of social work I got talking to, and she
responded by saying that only the cases that go bad, get reported.
ps
What they aren't telling you about DNA profiles
and what Special Branch don't want you to know.
http://www.nutteing.chat.ru/dnapr.htm
or nutteingd in a search engine.
date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 19:16:05 +0100
author: Paul Nutteing (valid email address in post script )
|
|
|