On 4 Dec, 21:15, "Niteawk"  wrote:
>  wrote in message
>
> news:7ddf53e9-5475-49d7-8402-ad96873104e7@a39g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 4 Dec, 19:00, "Niteawk"  wrote:
> >> "Robbie"  wrote in message
>
> >>news:5rlfmkF151r30U2@mid.individual.net...
>
> >> > Niteawk wrote:
>
> >> >>  wrote in message >
>
> >> >>> Seems to be a fair bit of screw them on both sides.Plusa good chunk
> >> >>> of trying to do the rigfht thing on each side too.
>
> >> >> I dont think so, a very high percentage will be signing on for the
> >> >> first
> >> >> time ever.Plusa fair percentage will not be out of work for long,
> >> >> you
> >> >> cant say these people have a screw them attitude. Maybe you can, this
> >> >> proves what some of us have been saying, you tar everyone with the
> >> >> same
> >> >> brush.
>
> >> > it does work both ways...
>
> >> Oh no it does not, there is a big difference, you lot make the rules and
> >> call the tune, like I said before, its down to you and how you treat
> >> people.- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > You lot?
> > I'm a charity worker who begs for a living. On a commercial scale
> > (spare a grand guv?).
>
> > I and the staff I work with have to have some rules. Which we do
> > make.
> > Things like no dealing on the premises. Outside the door is a
> > different matter....
>
> > Martin  <><
>
> Yes of course you need rules, the rules I speak of are rules which are of no
> use to anyone, bureaucracy for the sake of it like Mandatory Courses, if
> those fucking courses were any good you would not have to force people to
> attend them, they would be queing up of their own free will.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

I take it you would't go on another New Deal course if you could help
it.