Re: fraud
On Aug 17, 10:17 pm, David Bolt wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Aug 2007, Mike wrote:-
>
> <snip>
>
> >Unless you are absolutely stupid an annoymous letter is easy, just
> >remember don't mention your name, address or that you live next door!
> >To be extra safe drive 30 miles in any direction and post the letter
> >in the first box you see.
>
> Or just take it in to a local office and post it into their own internal
> mail system. That way there's no postmark so making it very difficult to
> track.
That deserves a supersonic whoosh!!!!!!!
> >Although ringing in might be the best way of providing the info (the
> >trained investigator will ask for info you might not put in a letter)
> >it may not be annoymous unless you inhibit the caller ID. Many
> >organisations including DWP offices have claller ID display and so I
> >assume some LAs might.
>
> If the council provide a telephone connected to their internal phone
> system so you can contact the various departments, taking advantage of
> that means the caller ID is going to either be non-existent or match one
> of their own numbers.
>
> Regards,
> David Bolt
When someone rings my DWP office no matter how often the original
caller is transfered the caller ID is displayed unless it's
inhibited. Far easier would be to inhibit the caller ID in the first
place rather than ask to be transferred around!
Also for a quid you can pick up a PAYG sim on ebay, use that and throw
it away. Don't forget to remove the battery from the phone, THEY can
still track it when it's switched of ......
Mike
date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 01:47:01 -0700
author: Mike
|