Could anyone please advise me, OH is still on the old system paying a
lot more than he would if on the new system.  This is so not right,
when are they going to migrate people?

Thanks

Eli

They are not going to migrate people, they are making a lot of money out of 
these people, CSA handed over more than 90 million to the treasury. Do you 
think this thieving government will kill a cash cow?

They announced CSA2 was dead, so all the migration stuff is just cancelled 
and as far as we are aware there are no plans to move anybody anymore, if 
you can't find a way to get reassessed under CSA2 then you just keep paying 
the extortion money on CSA1!


"Eli"  wrote in message 
news:9272b792-ac16-4875-9ab5-b7ecb1bb2e3a@34g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> Could anyone please advise me, OH is still on the old system paying a
> lot more than he would if on the new system.  This is so not right,
> when are they going to migrate people?
>
> Thanks
>
> Eli

There is no way we can get migrated onto CSA2 other than me have a
baby and the likehood of that happening is very remote.  It makes me
sick that we are paying over £500 a month to these idiots.  Step son
is now 16 and nearing finishing school and my husband would so much
rather pay that direct to him in a bank account.  It makes me
furious.  Why should the ex still be getting the money at this late
stage?

Yeh I know exactly where youre coming from on this and yes it is all wrong 
but the only people who can make changes are MP's and we know they are 
mostly a shower of wealthy self serving bastards, just look at their 
expenses!

"Eli"  wrote in message 
news:61b21000-e376-4108-b49f-dee62e88e876@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
There is no way we can get migrated onto CSA2 other than me have a
baby and the likehood of that happening is very remote.  It makes me
sick that we are paying over £500 a month to these idiots.  Step son
is now 16 and nearing finishing school and my husband would so much
rather pay that direct to him in a bank account.  It makes me
furious.  Why should the ex still be getting the money at this late
stage?

Yup Fletch, my MP is as much use as a chocolate teapot.  He did get
involved some time ago but I did all the work, he just forwarded my
letters on with his headed paper.  You never see him in the papers
talking about the CSA its always about the new runway at Stansted
airport.

In article <ba294573-5c79-4300-bc11-1199da128969
@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>, elainees@hotmail.com says...
> Yup Fletch, my MP is as much use as a chocolate teapot.  He did get
> involved some time ago but I did all the work, he just forwarded my
> letters on with his headed paper.  You never see him in the papers
> talking about the CSA its always about the new runway at Stansted
> airport.
> 
Because the CSA only chases "feckless fathers". What rights do they 
have? Have you ever heard about "feckless mothers"? No, of course not. I 
have successfully got the CSA to stop using terms such as "parent with 
care" - Oh what, so you're saying I don't care then? And "parent with 
responsibility". We have joint custody, does that somehow make me not 
responsible? What they didn't like at all was when my 17yo came to live 
with me. "No, *I'm* the parent." "But **** is the parent with care". No, 
*I'm* the parent with care..." It is very difficult sometimes NOT to use 
my birthright ethnic language, but they don't seem to like Anglo-
Saxon....

That seems a lot for just one 16 yr old - I thought I was in a bad way for 
paying over £400 per month for a 16 and 13 year old.

Unless of course your husband has a net income of getting on for £5000 per 
month, assuming no mortgage and no shared care.

-- 

"Eli"  wrote in message 
news:61b21000-e376-4108-b49f-dee62e88e876@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
There is no way we can get migrated onto CSA2 other than me have a
baby and the likehood of that happening is very remote.  It makes me
sick that we are paying over £500 a month to these idiots.  Step son
is now 16 and nearing finishing school and my husband would so much
rather pay that direct to him in a bank account.  It makes me
furious.  Why should the ex still be getting the money at this late
stage?

oops - should have been around £3000 per month net

-- 

"Lostout"  wrote in message 
news:48431209$1_4@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> That seems a lot for just one 16 yr old - I thought I was in a bad way for 
> paying over £400 per month for a 16 and 13 year old.
>
> Unless of course your husband has a net income of getting on for £5000 per 
> month, assuming no mortgage and no shared care.
>
> -- 
>
> "Eli"  wrote in message 
> news:61b21000-e376-4108-b49f-dee62e88e876@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> There is no way we can get migrated onto CSA2 other than me have a
> baby and the likehood of that happening is very remote.  It makes me
> sick that we are paying over £500 a month to these idiots.  Step son
> is now 16 and nearing finishing school and my husband would so much
> rather pay that direct to him in a bank account.  It makes me
> furious.  Why should the ex still be getting the money at this late
> stage?
>

On Jun 1, 5:17 pm, "Lostout"  wrote:
> That seems a lot for just one 16 yr old - I thought I was in a bad way for> paying over £400 per month for a 16 and 13 year old.
>
> Unless of course your husband has a net income of getting on for £5000 per
> month, assuming no mortgage and no shared care.

I'm also on CSA1 and pay £500 per month for one child.  The useless,
work-shy whore even gets a cut of my operational bonus whilst I stag
on for Queen & Country overseas...  How disgraceful is that?  Still,
whilst my son goes round looking like a tramp, the CSA, the whore and
her pikey boyfriend are coining it.  Oh, and my MP turned out to be a
useless prick also - lent his letterhead, but not at all interested in
getting me a correct assessment.. and I'm fighting his war!!

In article <48431209$1_4@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com>, 
removepjgiddthis@tiscali.co.uk says...
> That seems a lot for just one 16 yr old - I thought I was in a bad way for 
> paying over £400 per month for a 16 and 13 year old.
> 
> Unless of course your husband has a net income of getting on for £5000 per 
> month, assuming no mortgage and no shared care.
> 
Ignore them. Pay it into his bank account. Then if they try DEO just 
tell the Judge what you are doing. ***k 'em.

The actual assessment is around £440 odd but he has to pay arrears as
they didn't do the review at the right time, and left it a year and
yes we have a mortgage ourselves to pay and yes we have shared care.
We have step son every other weekend and every Wednesday.

Its day light robbery.  The BFH is deemed not one penny financially
responsible for him.