Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
misc
announce
answers
consultants
d-i-y
environment
environment.conservation
gov.agency.csa
gov.local
gov.social-security
gov.social-work
misc
philosophy.atheism
philosophy.humanism
philosophy.misc
radio.amateur
railway
sci.astronomy
sci.med.nursing
sci.med.pharmacy
sci.misc
sci.weather
singles
telecom
telecom.broadband
telecom.mobile
telecom.voip
test
transport
transport.air
transport.buses
transport.ferry
transport.london
transport.ride-sharing
  
 
date: Thu, 1 May 2008 09:27:21 +0100,    group: uk.gov.agency.csa        back       
OT but another rouge gov dept.   
The world-famous Red Arrows have been banned from appearing at the 2012 
London Olympics because they are deemed 'too British'.

Organisers of the event say that the Arrows military background might be 
'offensive' to other countries taking part in the Games. The display team 
have performed at more than 4000 events worldwide, but the Department of 
Culture, Media and Sport http://www.culture.gov.uk have deemed the display 
team 'too militaristically British'. Red Arrows pilots were said to be 
'outraged', as they had hoped to put on a truly world class display for the 
Games, something which had never been seen before. Being axed from a 
British-based event for being 'too British' is an insult - the Arrows are a 
symbol of Britain

The Red Arrows have been excellent ambassadors for British overseas trade, 
as they display their British-built Hawk aircraft all over the world.

The Arrows performed a short flypast in 2005 when the winning bid was 
announced, but their flypast at the Games was to have been truly 
spectacular.

It is to be hoped that common sense prevails

If you disagree with this decision, please sign the petition on the link 
below:

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/RedArrows2012/?ref=redArrows2012

Please do forward this on to everyone you can.

John Bennett
656 Sqn Assn
date: Thu, 1 May 2008 09:27:21 +0100   author:   Fletcher

Re: OT but another rouge gov dept.   
Seen this several times before, it's not true.  The Red Arrows themselves 
deny it here:

http://www.raf.mod.uk/reds/teamnews/index.cfm?storyid=66845B01-1143-EC82-2E376B2F89D95041

"Fletcher"  wrote in message 
news:gqKdndbs4-on44TVnZ2dnUVZ8v6dnZ2d@giganews.com...
> The world-famous Red Arrows have been banned from appearing at the 2012 
> London Olympics because they are deemed 'too British'.
>
> Organisers of the event say that the Arrows military background might be 
> 'offensive' to other countries taking part in the Games. The display team 
> have performed at more than 4000 events worldwide, but the Department of 
> Culture, Media and Sport http://www.culture.gov.uk have deemed the display 
> team 'too militaristically British'. Red Arrows pilots were said to be 
> 'outraged', as they had hoped to put on a truly world class display for 
> the Games, something which had never been seen before. Being axed from a 
> British-based event for being 'too British' is an insult - the Arrows are 
> a symbol of Britain
>
> The Red Arrows have been excellent ambassadors for British overseas trade, 
> as they display their British-built Hawk aircraft all over the world.
>
> The Arrows performed a short flypast in 2005 when the winning bid was 
> announced, but their flypast at the Games was to have been truly 
> spectacular.
>
> It is to be hoped that common sense prevails
>
> If you disagree with this decision, please sign the petition on the link 
> below:
>
> http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/RedArrows2012/?ref=redArrows2012
>
> Please do forward this on to everyone you can.
>
> John Bennett
> 656 Sqn Assn
>
>
date: Thu, 01 May 2008 13:13:33 GMT   author:   Toffee

Re: OT but another rouge gov dept.   
Thanks Toffee, guess I got caught out on this one, it came from what I 
thought was a reliable source, I should have checked first. Appologies to 
all for the post.


"Toffee"  wrote in message 
news:1mjSj.307$EH2.222@newsfe1-win.ntli.net...
> Seen this several times before, it's not true.  The Red Arrows themselves 
> deny it here:
>
> http://www.raf.mod.uk/reds/teamnews/index.cfm?storyid=66845B01-1143-EC82-2E376B2F89D95041
>
> "Fletcher"  wrote in message 
> news:gqKdndbs4-on44TVnZ2dnUVZ8v6dnZ2d@giganews.com...
>> The world-famous Red Arrows have been banned from appearing at the 2012 
>> London Olympics because they are deemed 'too British'.
>>
>> Organisers of the event say that the Arrows military background might be 
>> 'offensive' to other countries taking part in the Games. The display team 
>> have performed at more than 4000 events worldwide, but the Department of 
>> Culture, Media and Sport http://www.culture.gov.uk have deemed the 
>> display team 'too militaristically British'. Red Arrows pilots were said 
>> to be 'outraged', as they had hoped to put on a truly world class display 
>> for the Games, something which had never been seen before. Being axed 
>> from a British-based event for being 'too British' is an insult - the 
>> Arrows are a symbol of Britain
>>
>> The Red Arrows have been excellent ambassadors for British overseas 
>> trade, as they display their British-built Hawk aircraft all over the 
>> world.
>>
>> The Arrows performed a short flypast in 2005 when the winning bid was 
>> announced, but their flypast at the Games was to have been truly 
>> spectacular.
>>
>> It is to be hoped that common sense prevails
>>
>> If you disagree with this decision, please sign the petition on the link 
>> below:
>>
>> http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/RedArrows2012/?ref=redArrows2012
>>
>> Please do forward this on to everyone you can.
>>
>> John Bennett
>> 656 Sqn Assn
>>
>>
>
>
date: Thu, 1 May 2008 15:17:07 +0100   author:   Fletcher

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us