Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
misc
announce
answers
consultants
d-i-y
environment
environment.conservation
gov.agency.csa
gov.local
gov.social-security
gov.social-work
misc
philosophy.atheism
philosophy.humanism
philosophy.misc
radio.amateur
railway
sci.astronomy
sci.med.nursing
sci.med.pharmacy
sci.misc
sci.weather
singles
telecom
telecom.broadband
telecom.mobile
telecom.voip
test
transport
transport.air
transport.buses
transport.ferry
transport.london
transport.ride-sharing
  
 
date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 09:52:00 +0000 (UTC),    group: uk.gov.agency.csa        back       
M-I'5`Pers ecution . co st of th e operat ion   
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-= MI5: cost of the. operation -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Here's what. a couple of other people on Usenet (uk.misc) had to say
regarding the cost of running. such an operation...

PO: >Have some sense, grow. up and smell reality. What you are talking about
PO: >would take loads of planning, tens. of thousands of pounds and lots of
PO: >people involved in the planning, execution and maintenance. of it. You
PO: >must have a very. high opinion of yourself to think you are worth it.

PM: >But. why? And why you? Do you realize how much it would cost to keep
PM: >one person under continuous surveillance for five years?. Think about
PM: >all the man/hours. Say they _just_ allocated a two man team. and a
PM: >supervisor. OK., Supervisor's salary, say, #30,000. a year. Two men,
PM: >#20,000 a year each.. But they'd need to work in shifts -- so it would
PM: >be six men at #20,000 (which with on-costs. would work out at more like
PM: >#30,000. to the employer.) 
PM:. >
PM: >So, we're talking #30,000 x 6. #180,000. plus say,. #40,000 for the 
PM:. >supervisor. #220,000. Then you've got the hardware involved. And 
PM: >any transcription that needs doing. You don't think the 'Big. Boss'
PM:. >would listen to hours and hours of tapes, do you.
PM:. >
PM: >So, all in all, you couldn't actually do the job. for much less than
PM: >a quarter million a year. Over five years. What are you. doing that makes
PM: >it worth the while of the state to spend over one and a quarter. million
PM: >on. you?

Those are pretty much the. sort of calculations that went through my head
once I stopped to consider what it must be. costing them to run this
operation.. The partial answer is, there have been periods when the
intensity has been greater, and times when little has happened. In. fact,
for much of 1993 and the first half of 1994,. very little happened. Although
I don't think that was for reasons of money - if they. can tap into the
taxpayer they're not going to be short. of resources, are they?

The more complete answer. is in the enormity of what they're doing. Relative
to. the cost to British pride of seeing their country humiliated for the
persecution of their own citizens, isn't is worth the cost. of four or five
people to. try to bring things to a close in the manner they would wish? To
the government a million or two is quite honestly nothing - if. they can
convince. themselves of the necessity of what they're doing, resources will
not be. the limiting factor.

8217
date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 09:52:00 +0000 (UTC)   author:   unknown

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us