<http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7109774.stm>

"A woman who became pregnant after a one-night stand has been given
the right to keep the birth a secret from the father. The Court of
Appeal ruling came after a county court ordered the 20-year-old to
tell both her parents and the father.

The three appeal judges agreed "the ultimate veto" over who is told
about the birth lay with the mother.

Fathers 4 Justice barrister Michael Cox said: "This father is the
victim of a wicked deceit in which the State has been complicit.

"It is now clear that the Government believes children have no
entitlement to a relationship with their fathers and that children are
the property of their mothers and of the State."

I wonder how the mother having 'the ultimate veto over who is told
about the birth' this will affect the CSA's ability to force mothers
to reveal the names of fathers?


-- 

I'm using an evaluation license of nemo since 190 days.
You should really try it!
http://www.malcom-mac.com/nemo

Yes this is just another example of how 'father' is to be abolished, now 
surplus to requirement. All the statistic prove that not having a father 
figure leads children to more crime, jail, unemployment and many become 
social misfits and so in the new state of affairs they consider father as an 
ancient antiquated and out moded ideology. DAD has no rights, he's a quick 
fuck and a sperm donor and a figure to be finacialy abused if that fits the 
particular will of the stste art the time.

Presumably now when this mother signs on and CSA ask who the father is she 
just waves the court result and no penalties will go against her yet causing 
more discrimination within the Gestapo machine as they will very probably 
reduce benefits for her neighbour who is in almost the same situation other 
than having the court result.

So much for the equality of their one shoe fits all system.

Any mother currently being penalised by the Gestapo for failing to name the 
'sperm donor' should kick up a merry stink as they are quite obviously now 
being abused by the state in light of this new judgement.

Is it possible that we live in a country where the 'learned Judges are so 
fucking dense? Is this place for real?'


"redmelons"  wrote in message 
news:nemoFri112307064825@news.tiscali.co.uk...
> <http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7109774.stm>
>
> "A woman who became pregnant after a one-night stand has been given
> the right to keep the birth a secret from the father. The Court of
> Appeal ruling came after a county court ordered the 20-year-old to
> tell both her parents and the father.
>
> The three appeal judges agreed "the ultimate veto" over who is told
> about the birth lay with the mother.
>
> Fathers 4 Justice barrister Michael Cox said: "This father is the
> victim of a wicked deceit in which the State has been complicit.
>
> "It is now clear that the Government believes children have no
> entitlement to a relationship with their fathers and that children are
> the property of their mothers and of the State."
>
> I wonder how the mother having 'the ultimate veto over who is told
> about the birth' this will affect the CSA's ability to force mothers
> to reveal the names of fathers?
>
>
> -- 
>
> I'm using an evaluation license of nemo since 190 days.
> You should really try it!
> http://www.malcom-mac.com/nemo
>