I forgot to mention the other alternative to NACSA is, may I suggest,
to get one of the elected Gods that are Labour MPs to pass a law
making you exempt from the Freedom of Information Act, (as they have
just done to hide details of their expense accounts paid for from our
taxes) so limiting the CSAs powers of investigation into you personal
details.  Perhaps a secret loan to the Labour Party funds would oil
the wheels so to speak, but I doubt what it cost to subscribe to NACSA
would quite be enough ;-)

Hmmm so all animals are not equal?


 wrote in message 
news:1179920957.008145.177820@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
>I forgot to mention the other alternative to NACSA is, may I suggest,
> to get one of the elected Gods that are Labour MPs to pass a law
> making you exempt from the Freedom of Information Act, (as they have
> just done to hide details of their expense accounts paid for from our
> taxes) so limiting the CSAs powers of investigation into you personal
> details.  Perhaps a secret loan to the Labour Party funds would oil
> the wheels so to speak, but I doubt what it cost to subscribe to NACSA
> would quite be enough ;-)
>

Hmmm so all animals are not equal?


 wrote in message 
news:1179920957.008145.177820@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
>I forgot to mention the other alternative to NACSA is, may I suggest,
> to get one of the elected Gods that are Labour MPs to pass a law
> making you exempt from the Freedom of Information Act, (as they have
> just done to hide details of their expense accounts paid for from our
> taxes) so limiting the CSAs powers of investigation into you personal
> details.  Perhaps a secret loan to the Labour Party funds would oil
> the wheels so to speak, but I doubt what it cost to subscribe to NACSA
> would quite be enough ;-)
>

Hmmm so all animals are not equal?


 wrote in message 
news:1179920957.008145.177820@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
>I forgot to mention the other alternative to NACSA is, may I suggest,
> to get one of the elected Gods that are Labour MPs to pass a law
> making you exempt from the Freedom of Information Act, (as they have
> just done to hide details of their expense accounts paid for from our
> taxes) so limiting the CSAs powers of investigation into you personal
> details.  Perhaps a secret loan to the Labour Party funds would oil
> the wheels so to speak, but I doubt what it cost to subscribe to NACSA
> would quite be enough ;-)
>

Hmmm so all animals are not equal?


 wrote in message 
news:1179920957.008145.177820@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
>I forgot to mention the other alternative to NACSA is, may I suggest,
> to get one of the elected Gods that are Labour MPs to pass a law
> making you exempt from the Freedom of Information Act, (as they have
> just done to hide details of their expense accounts paid for from our
> taxes) so limiting the CSAs powers of investigation into you personal
> details.  Perhaps a secret loan to the Labour Party funds would oil
> the wheels so to speak, but I doubt what it cost to subscribe to NACSA
> would quite be enough ;-)
>

Hmmm so all animals are not equal?


 wrote in message 
news:1179920957.008145.177820@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
>I forgot to mention the other alternative to NACSA is, may I suggest,
> to get one of the elected Gods that are Labour MPs to pass a law
> making you exempt from the Freedom of Information Act, (as they have
> just done to hide details of their expense accounts paid for from our
> taxes) so limiting the CSAs powers of investigation into you personal
> details.  Perhaps a secret loan to the Labour Party funds would oil
> the wheels so to speak, but I doubt what it cost to subscribe to NACSA
> would quite be enough ;-)
>

Hmmm so all animals are not equal?


 wrote in message 
news:1179920957.008145.177820@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
>I forgot to mention the other alternative to NACSA is, may I suggest,
> to get one of the elected Gods that are Labour MPs to pass a law
> making you exempt from the Freedom of Information Act, (as they have
> just done to hide details of their expense accounts paid for from our
> taxes) so limiting the CSAs powers of investigation into you personal
> details.  Perhaps a secret loan to the Labour Party funds would oil
> the wheels so to speak, but I doubt what it cost to subscribe to NACSA
> would quite be enough ;-)
>

Hmmm so all animals are not equal?


 wrote in message 
news:1179920957.008145.177820@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
>I forgot to mention the other alternative to NACSA is, may I suggest,
> to get one of the elected Gods that are Labour MPs to pass a law
> making you exempt from the Freedom of Information Act, (as they have
> just done to hide details of their expense accounts paid for from our
> taxes) so limiting the CSAs powers of investigation into you personal
> details.  Perhaps a secret loan to the Labour Party funds would oil
> the wheels so to speak, but I doubt what it cost to subscribe to NACSA
> would quite be enough ;-)
>

Hmmm so all animals are not equal?


 wrote in message 
news:1179920957.008145.177820@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
>I forgot to mention the other alternative to NACSA is, may I suggest,
> to get one of the elected Gods that are Labour MPs to pass a law
> making you exempt from the Freedom of Information Act, (as they have
> just done to hide details of their expense accounts paid for from our
> taxes) so limiting the CSAs powers of investigation into you personal
> details.  Perhaps a secret loan to the Labour Party funds would oil
> the wheels so to speak, but I doubt what it cost to subscribe to NACSA
> would quite be enough ;-)
>

Hmmm so all animals are not equal?


 wrote in message 
news:1179920957.008145.177820@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
>I forgot to mention the other alternative to NACSA is, may I suggest,
> to get one of the elected Gods that are Labour MPs to pass a law
> making you exempt from the Freedom of Information Act, (as they have
> just done to hide details of their expense accounts paid for from our
> taxes) so limiting the CSAs powers of investigation into you personal
> details.  Perhaps a secret loan to the Labour Party funds would oil
> the wheels so to speak, but I doubt what it cost to subscribe to NACSA
> would quite be enough ;-)
>

Hmmm so all animals are not equal?


 wrote in message 
news:1179920957.008145.177820@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
>I forgot to mention the other alternative to NACSA is, may I suggest,
> to get one of the elected Gods that are Labour MPs to pass a law
> making you exempt from the Freedom of Information Act, (as they have
> just done to hide details of their expense accounts paid for from our
> taxes) so limiting the CSAs powers of investigation into you personal
> details.  Perhaps a secret loan to the Labour Party funds would oil
> the wheels so to speak, but I doubt what it cost to subscribe to NACSA
> would quite be enough ;-)
>

Hmmm so all animals are not equal?


 wrote in message 
news:1179920957.008145.177820@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
>I forgot to mention the other alternative to NACSA is, may I suggest,
> to get one of the elected Gods that are Labour MPs to pass a law
> making you exempt from the Freedom of Information Act, (as they have
> just done to hide details of their expense accounts paid for from our
> taxes) so limiting the CSAs powers of investigation into you personal
> details.  Perhaps a secret loan to the Labour Party funds would oil
> the wheels so to speak, but I doubt what it cost to subscribe to NACSA
> would quite be enough ;-)
>

Hmmm so all animals are not equal?


 wrote in message 
news:1179920957.008145.177820@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
>I forgot to mention the other alternative to NACSA is, may I suggest,
> to get one of the elected Gods that are Labour MPs to pass a law
> making you exempt from the Freedom of Information Act, (as they have
> just done to hide details of their expense accounts paid for from our
> taxes) so limiting the CSAs powers of investigation into you personal
> details.  Perhaps a secret loan to the Labour Party funds would oil
> the wheels so to speak, but I doubt what it cost to subscribe to NACSA
> would quite be enough ;-)
>

Hmmm so all animals are not equal?


 wrote in message 
news:1179920957.008145.177820@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
>I forgot to mention the other alternative to NACSA is, may I suggest,
> to get one of the elected Gods that are Labour MPs to pass a law
> making you exempt from the Freedom of Information Act, (as they have
> just done to hide details of their expense accounts paid for from our
> taxes) so limiting the CSAs powers of investigation into you personal
> details.  Perhaps a secret loan to the Labour Party funds would oil
> the wheels so to speak, but I doubt what it cost to subscribe to NACSA
> would quite be enough ;-)
>

Hmmm so all animals are not equal?


 wrote in message 
news:1179920957.008145.177820@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
>I forgot to mention the other alternative to NACSA is, may I suggest,
> to get one of the elected Gods that are Labour MPs to pass a law
> making you exempt from the Freedom of Information Act, (as they have
> just done to hide details of their expense accounts paid for from our
> taxes) so limiting the CSAs powers of investigation into you personal
> details.  Perhaps a secret loan to the Labour Party funds would oil
> the wheels so to speak, but I doubt what it cost to subscribe to NACSA
> would quite be enough ;-)
>

Hmmm so all animals are not equal?


 wrote in message 
news:1179920957.008145.177820@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
>I forgot to mention the other alternative to NACSA is, may I suggest,
> to get one of the elected Gods that are Labour MPs to pass a law
> making you exempt from the Freedom of Information Act, (as they have
> just done to hide details of their expense accounts paid for from our
> taxes) so limiting the CSAs powers of investigation into you personal
> details.  Perhaps a secret loan to the Labour Party funds would oil
> the wheels so to speak, but I doubt what it cost to subscribe to NACSA
> would quite be enough ;-)
>

Hmmm so all animals are not equal?


 wrote in message 
news:1179920957.008145.177820@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
>I forgot to mention the other alternative to NACSA is, may I suggest,
> to get one of the elected Gods that are Labour MPs to pass a law
> making you exempt from the Freedom of Information Act, (as they have
> just done to hide details of their expense accounts paid for from our
> taxes) so limiting the CSAs powers of investigation into you personal
> details.  Perhaps a secret loan to the Labour Party funds would oil
> the wheels so to speak, but I doubt what it cost to subscribe to NACSA
> would quite be enough ;-)
>

Hmmm so all animals are not equal?


 wrote in message 
news:1179920957.008145.177820@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
>I forgot to mention the other alternative to NACSA is, may I suggest,
> to get one of the elected Gods that are Labour MPs to pass a law
> making you exempt from the Freedom of Information Act, (as they have
> just done to hide details of their expense accounts paid for from our
> taxes) so limiting the CSAs powers of investigation into you personal
> details.  Perhaps a secret loan to the Labour Party funds would oil
> the wheels so to speak, but I doubt what it cost to subscribe to NACSA
> would quite be enough ;-)
>

Hmmm so all animals are not equal?


 wrote in message 
news:1179920957.008145.177820@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
>I forgot to mention the other alternative to NACSA is, may I suggest,
> to get one of the elected Gods that are Labour MPs to pass a law
> making you exempt from the Freedom of Information Act, (as they have
> just done to hide details of their expense accounts paid for from our
> taxes) so limiting the CSAs powers of investigation into you personal
> details.  Perhaps a secret loan to the Labour Party funds would oil
> the wheels so to speak, but I doubt what it cost to subscribe to NACSA
> would quite be enough ;-)
>

Hmmm so all animals are not equal?


 wrote in message 
news:1179920957.008145.177820@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
>I forgot to mention the other alternative to NACSA is, may I suggest,
> to get one of the elected Gods that are Labour MPs to pass a law
> making you exempt from the Freedom of Information Act, (as they have
> just done to hide details of their expense accounts paid for from our
> taxes) so limiting the CSAs powers of investigation into you personal
> details.  Perhaps a secret loan to the Labour Party funds would oil
> the wheels so to speak, but I doubt what it cost to subscribe to NACSA
> would quite be enough ;-)
>

Hmmm so all animals are not equal?


 wrote in message 
news:1179920957.008145.177820@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
>I forgot to mention the other alternative to NACSA is, may I suggest,
> to get one of the elected Gods that are Labour MPs to pass a law
> making you exempt from the Freedom of Information Act, (as they have
> just done to hide details of their expense accounts paid for from our
> taxes) so limiting the CSAs powers of investigation into you personal
> details.  Perhaps a secret loan to the Labour Party funds would oil
> the wheels so to speak, but I doubt what it cost to subscribe to NACSA
> would quite be enough ;-)
>

Hmmm so all animals are not equal?


 wrote in message 
news:1179920957.008145.177820@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
>I forgot to mention the other alternative to NACSA is, may I suggest,
> to get one of the elected Gods that are Labour MPs to pass a law
> making you exempt from the Freedom of Information Act, (as they have
> just done to hide details of their expense accounts paid for from our
> taxes) so limiting the CSAs powers of investigation into you personal
> details.  Perhaps a secret loan to the Labour Party funds would oil
> the wheels so to speak, but I doubt what it cost to subscribe to NACSA
> would quite be enough ;-)
>

Hmmm so all animals are not equal?


 wrote in message 
news:1179920957.008145.177820@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
>I forgot to mention the other alternative to NACSA is, may I suggest,
> to get one of the elected Gods that are Labour MPs to pass a law
> making you exempt from the Freedom of Information Act, (as they have
> just done to hide details of their expense accounts paid for from our
> taxes) so limiting the CSAs powers of investigation into you personal
> details.  Perhaps a secret loan to the Labour Party funds would oil
> the wheels so to speak, but I doubt what it cost to subscribe to NACSA
> would quite be enough ;-)
>

Hmmm so all animals are not equal?


 wrote in message 
news:1179920957.008145.177820@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
>I forgot to mention the other alternative to NACSA is, may I suggest,
> to get one of the elected Gods that are Labour MPs to pass a law
> making you exempt from the Freedom of Information Act, (as they have
> just done to hide details of their expense accounts paid for from our
> taxes) so limiting the CSAs powers of investigation into you personal
> details.  Perhaps a secret loan to the Labour Party funds would oil
> the wheels so to speak, but I doubt what it cost to subscribe to NACSA
> would quite be enough ;-)
>