In article , 
amacmil304@aol.com writes
>On Mon, 5 Oct 2009 20:49:46 +0100, Malcolm
> wrote:
>
>>
>>In article ,
>>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>>On Sun, 4 Oct 2009 21:19:57 +0100, Malcolm
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>In article ,
>>>>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>>>>On Sun, 4 Oct 2009 21:08:28 +0100, Malcolm
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>In article ,
>>>>>>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I am beginning to form an impression that when you are starting to
>>>>>>>find the going difficult you edge towards personal insult and abuse.
>>>>>>>There have been one or two posts where I feel your replies are
>>>>>>>intended to be insulting.  Are you incapable of holding your own in
>>>>>>>open debate without that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>This is a copy and paste containing nothing of interest that you have
>>>>>>used many times, trotting it out when you realise that you have lost the
>>>>>>argument and have nothing with which to counter the points made against
>>>>>>your evidenceless claims.
>>>>>
>>>>>No, I trot it out when you start to lose the argument and get abusive.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>Yawnnnn.
>>>
>>>
>>>Go to bed.  You're mind's getting to old for sensible discussion.
>>>
>>>
>>I yawn when I'm bored, Angus. And, anyway, my brain is younger than
>>yours.
>
>But probably not as sharp :-)
>
I can't see any reason why you think your brain is "sharp".

>>
>>Go figure :-)
>
>I have.

Good. That might mean you realise your limitations.


-- 
Malcolm

On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 09:46:27 +0100, amacmil304@aol.com wrote:

>On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 07:07:17 +0100, Malcolm
> wrote:
>
>>
>>In article , 
>>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>>
>>>No Malcolm. Anyone can understand what you write is a bilge full of
>>>prejudice against non-natives, people with low academic
>>>qualifications, menial task workers and old age.
>>>
>>Thank you for your surrender, Angus, now adding downright lies to your 
>>usual childish abuse and name calling :-(
>>
>
>There can't be much more nasty prejudice than your posting against
>school leavers.
>
>Internet posting from Dr Malcolm A Ogilvie 
>to Malcolm Kane of Penrith
>
>
>“Malcolm, it must be what a teacher feels like after trying to drum
>something into the head of the dullard who is going to leave school
>with a single 'O' grade. There's only so much that someone so
>intellectually challenged can understand. The problem will come in
>later life, when an inability to grasp concepts, not to mention be
>able to understand the meanings of words, will seriously let them
>down, to the point when, how ever often they are told something, they
>merely repeat, as a rote, statements and claims which they think are
>very telling but, in fact, were meaningless or just plain wrong the
>first time, and continue to be so regardless of how many times they
>are repeated. The situation will be even worse if, during their lives,
>they have gained absolutely no personal knowledge of the subjects
>about which they spout and thus are completely unable to comprehend
>anyone who points out that their ignorance is letting them down.”
>
>Dr Malcolm A Ogilvie
>Scientific Adviser to Scottish Natural Heritage
>On Internet Newsgroup uk.environment.conservation
>Date: Mon,18 Sept 2006 07:32;30 +0100
>
>
>>>
>>>You're really desperate, Malcolm
>>
>>More lies from Angus. I am not "desperate".
>>
>>Surrender accepted.
>
>Not given.

On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 12:05:03 +0100, Malcolm
 wrote:

>
>In article , 
>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 07:07:17 +0100, Malcolm
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>In article ,
>>>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>>>
>>>>No Malcolm. Anyone can understand what you write is a bilge full of
>>>>prejudice against non-natives, people with low academic
>>>>qualifications, menial task workers and old age.
>>>>
>>>Thank you for your surrender, Angus, now adding downright lies to your
>>>usual childish abuse and name calling :-(
>>>
>>
>>There can't be much more nasty prejudice than your posting against
>>school leavers.
>>
>I did NOT post against school leavers. I used the word "dullard", which 
>is singular, something you clearly can't comprehend.

It was generic as the context clearly shows.

Even your boss in SNH said it was "unfortunate".   

>>
>>
>>>>
>>>>You're really desperate, Malcolm
>>>
>>>More lies from Angus. I am not "desperate".
>>>
>>>Surrender accepted.
>>
>>Not given.
>>
>Too bad. You surrendered.


Not me.