In article 
, 
John M.  writes
>On Aug 25, 11:05 pm, Malcolm  wrote:
>> In article ,
>> amacmil...@aol.com writes
>>
>> >On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:36:29 -0700 (PDT), "John M."
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >>On Aug 25, 5:23 pm, amacmil...@aol.com wrote:
>> >>> On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 00:33:12 -0700 (PDT), "John M."
>>
>> >>> >Explain how these trips are more damaging to the Arctic environment
>> >>> >than the trans-Alaska pipeline, which carries the oil for gas-guzzling
>> >>> >cars such as Range Rovers..
>>
>> >>> They're probably not but only crooks would try to make money out of
>> >>> then under the "conservation" banner.
>>
>> >>It's a business like any other.
>>
>> >Yes I agree.  But many are masquerading under the charity banner and
>> >claim not to be "a business like any other".  How many times has
>> >Malcolm Ogilvie said they're not businesses but charities.  Pleased to
>> >see you disagree with him.  You're getting there.
>>
>> >> It has its codes of conduct ,and all
>> >>business is ethically reviewed to some degree by the powers that be.
>> >>So are you saying that all business people are crooks?
>>
>> >No I'm not.  But those even you think are "businesses like any other"
>> >should be subject to the same rules as other "businesses like any
>> >other" with regard to misrepresentation.  And misrepresentation in
>> >business is crooked and seen as such.
>>
>> Says Angus, after a typical piece of misrepresentation :-(
>
>Isn't it interesting that we have got this far in the discussion and
>he has yet to invoke Godwin's Law.

Perhaps my telling him repeatedly that he is obsessed has had an effect 
:-))

But perhaps not!
-- 
Malcolm