On Aug 25, 11:05 pm, Malcolm  wrote:
> In article ,
> amacmil...@aol.com writes
>
> >On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:36:29 -0700 (PDT), "John M."
> > wrote:
>
> >>On Aug 25, 5:23 pm, amacmil...@aol.com wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 00:33:12 -0700 (PDT), "John M."
>
> >>> >Explain how these trips are more damaging to the Arctic environment
> >>> >than the trans-Alaska pipeline, which carries the oil for gas-guzzling
> >>> >cars such as Range Rovers..
>
> >>> They're probably not but only crooks would try to make money out of
> >>> then under the "conservation" banner.
>
> >>It's a business like any other.
>
> >Yes I agree.  But many are masquerading under the charity banner and
> >claim not to be "a business like any other".  How many times has
> >Malcolm Ogilvie said they're not businesses but charities.  Pleased to
> >see you disagree with him.  You're getting there.
>
> >> It has its codes of conduct ,and all
> >>business is ethically reviewed to some degree by the powers that be.
> >>So are you saying that all business people are crooks?
>
> >No I'm not.  But those even you think are "businesses like any other"
> >should be subject to the same rules as other "businesses like any
> >other" with regard to misrepresentation.  And misrepresentation in
> >business is crooked and seen as such.
>
> Says Angus, after a typical piece of misrepresentation :-(

Isn't it interesting that we have got this far in the discussion and
he has yet to invoke Godwin's Law.